315

Feddit.org announced today that they are changing their rules to match German law despite their server not being hosted in Germany.

Feddit.org now bans:

  • The sentence "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free"

  • Comparing Israel to the Nazis

  • Calls to end Zionism

  • Calling for the dissolution of Israel

And much more. The full original post can be found here, or

Click here for full text of original post:

Hi.

In the past few days, discontent regarding mod decisions in this community has been brewing, particularly when it comes to comments on Palestine, Israel, and Israeli politics and actions. There are also misunderstandings regarding mod intention and German law. We hope to clear that up with this post.

While the servers of feddit.org are in Austria, most of the mods of this community as well as admins of this server live in Germany. Speaking of, our server admins have also posted a write-up on the same topic.

And with that, let's go:

In Germany, antisemitism is specifically sanctioned in German criminal law, both for speech and as a motivation for other criminal behavior. In addition, Germany seeks to protect the Jewish state of Israel (the so-called "Reason of State" introduced in 2008) and thus verges toward protecting Zionism as well. Certain criticism of Israel/Israelis is also categorized as "Israel-related antisemitism".

Since criminal law is involved, enforcement can mean things like police raids and device confiscations. After such police action, it does not really matter if it was appropriate or if cases are dropped or never charged: The damage is done. All told, it's not that fun.

There is also no point in engaging in discussions about the veracity of statements that could get us into legal trouble. In addition, we believe that you can express most opinions without breaking rules.

If your comment contains the following, it will be removed from this community:

  • Calling for the dissolution of Israel, or calling for a one-state solution without specifying equal rights for all people; Jewish in particular.
  • Calling for a destruction, annihilation, an end of all Zionism or the like.
  • Equating Israeli actions and (historical) Nazism.
  • The slogan "from the river..."
  • Endorsement of or justifications for Hamas or Hezbollah, or slogans or graphics positively referring to these organizations. These are considered terrorist organizations in Germany.
  • ... and obviously: Any of the common antisemitic tropes or calls to violence against Jews or Israelis

Comments will not be removed for the following:

  • Denouncing genocide.
  • Denouncing Israeli war crimes.
  • Criticizing Zionism as an ideology or political movement.
  • Referring to the current Israeli government as "criminal," "expansionist," or "far-right".

If your comment is removed nonetheless, these are not the reason. I'd also like to stress that this community was never a free-speech-absolutist zone: It is a (usually lightly) moderated community. There may also be times when bans go too far. In such cases, please DM the @EuroMod@feddit.org account (which all mods have access to).

spoiler To help you understand why, I'll leave an assortment of sources here (translations via DeepL).

  • A news report:

    Berlin in mid-May [2024] around 6 o'clock in the morning. A loud, continuous "banging" against the apartment door wakes student Alina T. from her sleep. [...] When her husband opens the door, several LKA officers, two employees of the district office and the SEK "storm" past him into the apartment. Puzzled, he looks at the search warrant. [...] The background to this was a Facebook entry in the student's profile: "From the river [...]

  • A legal treatise:

    In November 2023, the Federal Ministry of the Interior and for Home Affairs also issued a prohibition order against Hamas.[60] According to the order, "the slogan 'From the River to the Sea' (in German or other languages)" is a distinguishing mark of Hamas[61]. [...] the current legal situation [regarding "Denial of Israel's right to exist"] is - contrary to what the statements of the Federal Ministry of Justice suggest[63] - anything but clear. Whether incitements to eliminate the State of Israel are prosecuted depends on the respective legal opinion and the prosecution will of the respective public prosecutor's office.

  • Press release from the previous government:

    In this context, Section 111 StGB, which covers public incitement to commit crimes, may also be relevant. Incitement to extinguish Israel's existence by force may be punishable under this provision. The same applies to calls to publicly display the Hamas flag. If Hamas attacks are publicly cheered and celebrated, this may also be punishable. This means that people who cheer on Hamas's actions or publicly express their sympathy with the attacks may constitute the criminal offence of "approval of criminal acts" under Section 140 of the German Criminal Code (StGB).

  • Another news report

    In connection with the controversial Palestine Congress in Berlin, the German authorities have also imposed an entry ban on former Greek finance minister Yanis Varoufakis. "In order to prevent antisemitic and anti-Israel propaganda at the event", several entry bans have been issued, the news agency AFP learned from security sources on Sunday. One of these concerned Varoufakis. (Notably, Varoufakis would have spoken about one-state solutions ...)

  • Overview Germany in 2024 by Amnesty International

  • Overview Germany in 2024 by Human Rights Watch

federal reverse (on behalf of the mods of !europe)


:::

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] woelkchen@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

I think the post in itself is informational, many of the comments are not.

Post stays, comments get locked.

[-] Turbonics@lemmy.sdf.org 38 points 2 days ago

From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.

[-] Grumpyleb@lemmus.org 25 points 2 days ago

Fuck the zionist genocidal bastards.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 131 points 2 days ago

Y'all should actually read the post. They're clear that they don't want to do this but fear extreme repression by the German government, and they even listed examples of what exactly they're trying to avoid. I'm no Israel apologist, but I'm convinced.

[-] Chozo@fedia.io 83 points 2 days ago

I've read the post, and I'm still unhappy with their decision. Capitulation only accelerates fascism.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 45 points 2 days ago

That's true, but it's still up to them whether they want to get arrested over social media comments somebody else made.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 53 points 2 days ago

I agree. Nobody should be risking their safety / livelihood / whatever to host a random internet discussion site. That doesn't mean we should leave the situation as it is. I believe the main concern is to move off the !europe comm there and onto the new one at !europe@lemmy.dbzer0.com

[-] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This is the best solution.

Zionism is a fascist ideology. There is nothing to gain from hosting in a country where people feel compelled to suppress opposition to and liberation against that fascist ideology out of fear of incarceration and police brutality

Free Palestine

ACAB

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Feddit users commenting beneath it support this. One of them made this "meme":

Feddit.org has also been banning users for things such as comparing Israel to the Nazis before they made this post. Then they owned up to it as their personal views. This is why they do not say they disagree with the German laws but they "do not wish to discuss it."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JiveTurkey@lemmy.world 67 points 2 days ago

I get their concerns but we shouldn't be bullied into silence. The Israeli government is a piece of shit and we should all be allowed to say that until they've proven otherwise.

[-] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

From the text of their original post it sounds like you're still allowed to say that. It's worth reading the post text itself (not saying that to change your stance, I have complicated feelings about this choice by them, but knowing what they're actually saying is worthwhile)

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You can do anything except demand things which could meaningfully resolve the issue.

People are not being allowed to call for the dissolution of the Israeli Apartheid government.

Or compare its genocidal deeds to those for which the Germans say "never again".

Because "never again" in Germany does not count for brown people.

People are only allowed to voice slight discontent with Israel. Forcing people to call a major crime a minor crime is a massive form of repression in itself and it serves to downplay reality, while pretending there is no censorship.

[-] Takapapatapaka@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Calling a state criminal, expantionist, genocidal, brutal, saying that they should answer for their crimes, give back palestinian territories immediatly, be boycotted by the whole world, even be subject to military intervention is still perfectly fine, and that's clearly not "slight discontent". If you were conscious of this, you message is huge bad faith.

What they do not allow is calling for the end of Israel, in any way. That's indeed a major crackdown on freedom of expression, but it does not leave you wordless for Israel criticism, unless your only goal is to be against Israel, and you don't care being alongside Palestine.

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

genocidal

Comparing Israel or Germany supporting it to the Nazis is banned.

give back palestinian territories immediatly

This is banned. Do you not understand that all of Israel is on Palestinian land or are you not willing to understand it?

even be subject to military intervention

This is banned too. Every group doing this gets designated as a "terrorist" group.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] prole 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'm sorry but how does any of that not fit into "calls to end Zionism"?

So, what, you can describe what they're doing but can't say you want it to stop?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] zeezee@slrpnk.net 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I hadn't noticed how pro-cop some feddit.org users are but a cursory glance at people taking police reporting at face value and then openly defending cops punching people in the face with "it's out of context" reasoning is just surreal.

It reeks to me of living in a bubble your whole life and never having experienced police repression - so your only response is "it can't be the police, they've never done anything against me, it must be the protestors that are wrong"

Usually I'm one that hates leftist infighting but defacto trying to suppress a genocide because the "law says so" is rather weak. Still I totally understand wanting to protect yourself from repression but surely if you cared about both justice and your well being you would just hand over the community to someone else? Unless of course you actually agree with the "law"...

[-] FundMECFSResearch 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Just FYI. There’s truth to this, but this post headline is very clickbait.

You’re still allowed to do things like call out the genocide, call the Israeli government facist etc.

What you can’t do is stuff like call for a violent overthrow of the state of Israel.

(Which I disagree with because since the status quo is violence I think violence is justified in overturning it)

But anyways. It’s less extreme than the headline suggests.

And also it’s in an effort to comply with German laws. (Which again, I disagree with, but I’m not the one at risk of getting raided here so yeah).

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago

Banning the call to dissolve the genocidal Israeli Apartheid would be akin to saying you can disagree with Donald Trump, but you are not allowed to say that he should be impeached.

Germans are not allowing the problem nor the solution to be named. Thus they live in a vague haze where both sides are guilty and there is seemingly no solution possible except the full genocide of all Palestinians.

[-] match@pawb.social 15 points 2 days ago

Huh, the rules amendment in OP says that they can't say the Israeli government is "expansionist" or "far-right", why would "fascist" be okay?

[-] 3abas@lemm.ee 18 points 2 days ago

Is you want to understand the spirit of the rules, look no further past the first one:

Calling for the dissolution of Israel, or calling for a one-state solution without specifying equal rights for all people; Jewish in particular.

Why Jewish in particular? How is "equal rights for all people" compatible with "one group of people in particular"?

Jewish supremacism, Israel and Zionism is Jewish ISIS, and trying to hide that part of Israel and punish any discourse around that problem is fascism.

They may let you call Israel fascist in passing, but they won't let you describe its fascism, that is the bannable offense.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago

Equal rights for all, but with Jewish people being more equal than everyone else.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 74 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Gonna mention that !europe@lemmy.dbzer0.com has been set up as an alternative for Europe-centric discussions

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MummysLittleBloodSlut 19 points 2 days ago

I got banned from that community for saying zionism is antisemitic. The mods called it "rage bait".

I was actually testing whether the mods are zionists, and since they were enraged by my post, I think they are.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 days ago

Elad Barashi, who has worked in the Israeli entertainment industry for several years, sparked outrage after posting on X: "Good morning, let there be a Shoa (Holocaust) in Gaza."

In another post, he wrote, "I can't understand the people here in the State of Israel who don't want to fill Gaza with gas showers... or train cars... and finish this story! Let there be a Holocaust in Gaza."

[-] frostysauce@lemmy.world 51 points 2 days ago

The title of this post is sensationalized, click-baitey, and factually incorrect according to the posted text. It's as if OP either didn't read the text they copy/pasted or they are trying to intentionally stir up shit...

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Nothing in the post is incorrect or sensationalized. You did not read it.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] prole 13 points 2 days ago

Calls to end Zionism

This one is egregious. I mean come on.

[-] cupcakezealot 38 points 2 days ago

germany making laws suppressing speech and criminalising free thought? never seen that before

[-] jbk@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 2 days ago

Please read the post. Those laws are in place to stop neonazis and other idiots from making the holocaust seem like it wasn't as terrible as it was.

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

These laws We are made to conflate anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism. Because Germany is weaponizing their previous genocide to justify their current one.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago

The best way to prevent another Holocaust is to make it illegal for anyone to ever warn that anything happening is similar to the Holocaust or to the Nazis and should be stopped before it goes further. Brilliant. Genius.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] rowdyrockets@lemm.ee 50 points 2 days ago

Ezpz. Just added feddit.org to my instance block. Freedom of the fediverse at work.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] VirgilMastercard@reddthat.com 34 points 2 days ago

Hand over control of the instance to someone else or shut it down completely.

[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 34 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They should just shut it down rather than comply with laws which punish antipathy towards a genocidal state.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] khaleer@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 days ago

Hahaha YES DEFEDERATE THE FEDIVERSE

[-] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 39 points 2 days ago

This kind of seems... reasonable? Like, they have and convey a compelling legal reason for needing to do this. There's plenty of other Lemmy instances where these opinions and statements can be freely expressed. Further, they're explicitly allowing discourse that conveys similar sentiment but doesn't go against German law.

I guess my question is, what's the objection here?

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago

They do not. Their servers are not hosted in Germany. If their moderators feel like they would be endangered for not following German law they should step down instead of applying their German censorship to a European server.

Their moderators and German users appear to proudly agree with these German censorship laws in the comments beneath their post. So the legal part looks more like a convenient excuse.

[-] rowdyrockets@lemm.ee 31 points 2 days ago

Agreed. They support the genocide and are hiding behind the law to save face.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 34 points 2 days ago

Mostly that they host the main Europe-centric comm, !Europe@feddit.org. You can see the problem when criticism of Europe's most powerful country is censored in said comm, and users banned, for relatively innocuous comments.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] toothbrush 33 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It is because their admins are in Germany and they fear the extreme repercussion that the German State has done recently. Did you even read the post you pasted? Are are you intentionally trying to stir up drama?

Not everyone lives in safety these days. Fascism has made it hard to do things like host a volunteer run online forum safely. There are cases where the heavily armed anti-terrorism unit SEK search peoples houses at gun point for this. Do you think online moderators should be required to catch a bullet for your posts?

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] dojan@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago

It amuses me that expressing understanding with the retaliation is forbidden. I definitely understand why a militant extremist group has arisen after decades of oppression and genocide.

Like, how do you negotiate your way out of that peacefully? Where in history has oppression on that level been defeated through diplomacy?

I seem to have forgotten the part where the allies defeated Nazi Germany by asking nicely. Surely no war was fought for recognising black people as humans in the U.S.

Perhaps Ukraine should put down their weapons and ask Russia to pretty please stop invading their country and killing their people.

Ugh.

load more comments (1 replies)

I bet they think they're just "following orders" like their forefathers...

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 May 2025
315 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

33557 readers
643 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS