310
Japan: "did you commit war crimes?"
Israel: "i'm outraged"
Japan:"that isn't a 'no'..."
If being asked to confirm that you have not committed war crimes makes you uncomfortable, then you might be a war criminal.
I'm pretty sure Japan's immigration asks if you've ever been convicted of a crime, so how is this any different?
It's different because no jury in Israel will convict someone of warcrimes (against Palestinians).
No conviction, no crime. EZ.
If israel doesn't like this treatment then they should stop the policy of forcing israeli citizens to serve in the israel genocide forces.
Are these the same types of war crimes that the Japanese committed in WW2 which they deny and don't teach they younger generation about?
I don't know why you are being down voted.
I love that the Japanese are treating Israeli's as members of the apartheid genocidal state that they are.
Japan also hasn't recognized or paid reparations for many of the horrendous war crimes they've committed themselves.
Both things can be true at the same time.
Classic Japanese. No dancing around or confusion about anti-semitism, just straight out asking the Israeli about recent war crimes.
Had the same as a Swiss guy living there: sure, everybody loves Roger Federer, but they also know about Nazi gold and the banking secret protecting dictatorships. And they just ask about it directly. Would never happen on Japanese topics though.
Yeah, it feels slightly tone-deaf for Japan to be doing this. It’s not quite as bad as the USA dong this but it is close
Japan is not doing this. A private business is.
IDF service is compulsory for Israeli citizens, so it was a legitimate question to ask.
load more comments
(1 replies)
This right here is what I love about Japan.
When I was there a few years ago to snowboard, they had a "fuck you" policy to non-Japanese speakers in some towns because the Aussies basically run around rough shod and turn everything into a loud party.
Imagine being in a sleepy resort town while 7 dudes are walking down your cobbled street screaming about Ruggers, then one falls into the cold stream because they're drunk, so a rescue team is sent out... On a weekly basis.
There's simply a no more bullshit cap.
So, to be clear, you get how that's more than a little bit fucked up, right?
To demonstrate, imagine a deep southern U.S town instituting an English-only policy and aggressively turning away for example Spanish or Arabic-speakers.
This is not something to be celebrated. Ban the thing you actually want to prevent instead of pushing through unmitigated xenophobia.
imagine a deep southern U.S town instituting an English-only policy and aggressively turning away for example Spanish or Arabic-speakers.
Yeah that's called Tuesday in the rural south.
Yes, I do. But I am a foreigner there. When we don't observe their traditions and disrupt their society, I feel like it's okay for them to set boundaries.
I get why it's not right, but I also accept it. It's not my country, not my rules, not my traditions. So, I am willing to live by their rules.
You realize not every country wants foreigners right? It’s their right to dictate that. There was this whole thing about how America and England literally threatened Japan with artillery until they opened their borders.
not every country wants foreigners It's their right to dictate that
That's an extremely complicated philosophical argument that goes beyond two simple sentences, I hope you realise
load more comments
(8 replies)
What you love about Japan is it’s cultural intolerance?
If you go into someone else's house, you need to be respectful of their space.
Many Chinese and Indian tourists regularly trample the alpine flower fields at Mt. Rainier National Park for selfies or just as a shortcut when they get tired of walking on the hiking paths.
When confronted, instead of being apologetic, they get defensive and diminish the impact of their actions by demeaning American culture and spaces.
"It's just some flowers. They'll grow back!"
Yeah, maybe. But that will take eighty years and it may not even happen due to climate change.
These kind of behaviors are what sours locals against tourism, especially when it is consistent across a cultural tourist groups.
We all need to do better when visiting each other's spaces, and that starts by owning our cultural shortfalls and poor behavior, with the goal of personally improving our own.
Ironically, I've never heard any complaints about Japanese tourists, as they often arrived well-educated about local customs and behave respectfully.
It's almost time to take a walk up on the Sunrise side to see the flowers, isn't it?
complaining about Chinese and Indian tourists on american soil is so ironic considering what american tourists usually do when abroad
There's a difference between being respectful of the space and racial exclusion. What they are backing is racism.
Japan is a nation that has intense issues with racism that they have never confronted and it is fucking weird how often people are willing to forgive their overt racism.
load more comments
(4 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(11 replies)
Wait, so Israel is not even trying to distance itself from war crimes... Their actual point is "not all war crimes are equal and it's difamatory to label everyone who commits war crimes with the same 'war criminal' label"... Wtf is wrong with those people.
No, their point is you shouldn’t be randomly asking Israelis if they committed war crimes.
The article points out there are ten nations whose citizens they ask this question.
It's not "random" if they've been committing genocide for the last 2 years.
Based on the article there's nothing random about it and it's not just any citizen. They ask it of people who served on nations that have active conflicts. So basically, people who might have been in position to commit war crimes.
load more comments
(4 replies)
Its what the free market wants ;)
How could any Israeli citizen say no on #3 At this point. Even if you arent directly committing atrocities yourself you still are funding the government engaging in it. Not to mention most all of them have served in one capacity or another (involuntary aspects nonwithstanding)
This honestly doesn't make much sense. The implication would be that all citizens are culpable for their government's actions once they start paying taxes.
Funding your government isn't a voluntary act, so your last parenthetical already invalidates most of what you said.
load more comments
(1 replies)
So by that logic, are all Americans war criminals because Americans pay taxes, which go to fund drone strikes that murder civilians overseas, domestic militarization of police, prisons, etc?
This is the same logic as "all Palastinians support Hamas."
So by that logic, are all Americans war criminals because Americans pay taxes, which go to fund drone strikes that murder civilians overseas, domestic militarization of police, prisons, etc?
Yes. Exactly like russians are all submitted to sanctions because of their government.
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(4 replies)
What's the protest? "We don't want to be pointed at when we commit war crimes" ?
The embassy thinks it is messed up to ask people if they committed war crimes.
This is ignoring they ask people from 10 different nations this question.
Is "asking" messed up or committing war crimes more messed up?
the same amount of war crimes as happened in Nanjing
Japanese man scribbles down zero
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
310 points (100.0% liked)
World News
46580 readers
1741 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS