61
submitted 6 days ago by wuphysics87@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Jesus. Another one of these? Every freaking day. (Promise it's different)

I personally like mint and pop!os for new users, but for this user I want to try something windows like with more sex appeal. I don't want to have to touch this computer again. Proprietary software is not an issue/consideration. User is techier than most. What has your experience been with kbuntu? Pros/cons? Other suggestions?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] pebbles@sh.itjust.works 48 points 6 days ago

Best I can offer is Hannah Montana linux

[-] warmaster@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago

If you want a set it and forget it distro to never touch his computer again, then consider going a Ublue distro. Aurora (only KDE), or Bazzite (choose the KDE image) if he does gaming.

[-] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 11 points 6 days ago

Get an immutable distro. You’ll never need to touch it again.

[-] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 days ago

This may actually hinders new users because you can't just change stuff on the system.

And no, not everything always work out of the box. Fedora & OpenSUSE codecs, I'm looking at you.

[-] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I think you overestimate the average persons need to configure their computers. Most people just use a web browser, email, and maybe some light gaming. No one new to Linux is going to be really upset that they can’t do complex system operations on the command line.

[-] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

No, but they'd be upset if they cannot play their usual media files. H265 is known to be absent by default on a lot of these distros.

[-] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 days ago

I’ve never had a problem with any media playback. I don’t think this is an issue on Bazzite, the immutable distro I’ve been using for over a year.

[-] qweertz@programming.dev 3 points 5 days ago

Atomic distros by Universal Blue build proprietary codecs into their images

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kristof12@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago

Mint is da only way

[-] FreeBooteR69@lemmy.ca 14 points 6 days ago

Well there are no operating systems that you can install and forget, unless they never plan to go online with the machine. They all need updating which can be set automatically. The only problem is if it requires manual intervention, sometimes updates don't go as planned, then a roll-back might be necessary. They could try an immutable linux distribution if they are worried about screwing up their installs or something. Fedora kinoite may be their thing, or Bazzite which is based on that.

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago

Bluefin and Bazzite have been good to me so far.

[-] Trimatrix@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The embedded IoT crowd would like to refute your claim that there are no operating systems that you can install and forget.

The collective would like to stress that any operating system can be installed and forgotten. Please note, that usefulness and security may be impacted.

/s

Also, to be technical there is CollapseOS which is an install once and forget sort of thing.

[-] Maragato@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

I used to recommend Ubuntu. Now that immutable distributions exist, I prefer to recommend openSUSE Aeon or Fedora Silverblue to new users. However, check this website before installing Linux.

https://endof10.org/

[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 days ago

This site refers to "local repair cafés" more than once. Is that a regional thing? I've never seen those three words in that order ever before.

[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago

I know I'll get down voted for this, but from that site:

"Microsoft wants you to buy a new computer.

But what if you could make your current one fast and secure again?"

Kind of a sensationalized statement. I've upgraded tons of machines from 2015 and newer to windows 11 without issues. Sure, not all of them, but I'd say a majority of them, and the "upgrade" is free.

I guess I wanted to point out this piece isn't as doom and gloom as it seems.

[-] vandsjov@feddit.dk 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I think you underestimate how many computers that are in use today that can’t be updated to Windows 11.

I, and many others, have run Windows 10 on unsupported hardware. Difference is that Windows 10 didn’t care and Windows 11 actively try to stop you from doing so. So, what is this if not Microsoft now forcing people to buy new hardware, if they have unsupported hardware?

Edit: What where the CPUs on the 2015 computers you upgraded?

[-] 0x0@lemmy.zip 13 points 6 days ago

Focus on the DE instead of the distro. There used to be one that has "windows look" as a goal.

[-] ClipperDefiance@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

I'm pretty sure that's Zorin. I've never used it myself, but from what I've heard it might be a good choice for OP's person.

[-] Neptr 4 points 6 days ago

Zorin is too walled off IMO. Too many features locked in Pro version.

[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago

The true Windows experience.

[-] Ashiette@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

There is nothing locked outside Pro version that you can't get by installing it manually :)

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)
[-] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 6 days ago

Agreed. For a new user that wants to minimise system maintenance I'd recommend the atomic version, Fedora Kinoite. Flatpak plus rpm-ostree makes it like a phone where you can just do system updates and install/remove apps.

[-] lordnikon@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

Debian is always the forgotten choice. You can install kde at time of install. It's stable and can be upgraded in the background automatically even between major versions. Doesn't have snaps making hell for the user. For any apps they need the newest version of Flatpak is right there in Discover software center.

[-] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 4 days ago

Sometimes I think "if debian had a flashy website and a few tweaks for user friendliness, then it would be just as attractive as linux mint or ubuntu for new users", and other times I think "isn't this exactly what most debian based distros are already?" Would there be a benefit if those projects worked under the debian name, something like debian workstation pure blend, or debian corporate pure blend? I don't know.

[-] lordnikon@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

The thing you have to remember is debian packaging is ment to be the most vanilla from upstream with only minor modifications to follow debian packaging guidelines. So tweaking for user friendliness would give you the same problems that debian's children have. Plus 90% of that user friendliness came from bundling Nvidia firmware in the installer. Which debian does now by default. The only thing you have to do now is maybe install the nvidia-driver package and that's it.

[-] qweertz@programming.dev 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Maybe Aurora by Universal Blue?

It's based off of Fedora Silverblue, so it's atomic, rock solid and basically guaranteed to work (more secure by design as well). But uses KDE Plasma instead of Gnome and has a bunch of improvements here and there, including proprietary codecs and Nvidia drivers preinstalled (latter depending on the image you choose)

[-] flork@lemy.lol 3 points 5 days ago

This is an excellent answer. Kinoite (basically the same thing as Aurora) is what enabled me to finally make the switch to full time linux a few months ago.

[-] data1701d@startrek.website 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I'm personally a fan of Debian. Default KDE isn't bad looking from what I can remember (I personally don't use it - I neither hate or love it just because I love XFCE). I'm personally a big XFCE fan, but you do have to do some work to get it working good, and there are still jank parts here and there.

While no distro is completely set and forget, I think Debian Stable is as close as you can get. Once you install it and get it working the way you want (depending on your setup, you might encounter minor issues as with any distro), it will pretty much stay that way until you upgrade to the next version, and you can go up to 5 years before upgrading.

I would recommend you use the KDE (or whatever DE you want) live installer, though, as the default installer is quite unintuitive. You can find it in the list of installers at https://www.debian.org/distrib/.

I've never used Kubuntu specifically, but I would personally avoid Ubuntu these days if just because of Snaps. Also, Ubuntu is heavily bloated - base Ubuntu is almost unusable in a VM now, while vanilla GNOME and PopOS run well in VMs on the same machine. Personally, when I need to test Ubuntu builds, I always prefer working with PopOS.

Overall, I'd say if you don't end up using Debian (I don't blame you - while I like it, you might not), just please don't use anything Ubuntu-based that isn't Mint or PopOS.

[-] oranki@sopuli.xyz 9 points 6 days ago

Another vote for Aurora.

Universal Blue in general has been really solid, I remember one time in the last year or two when there's been any need for manual intervention. And that came with a notification after boot, with a link to instructions that were all copy-pastable as-is to the terminal.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 8 points 6 days ago

I want to try something windows like with more sex appeal.

Elaborate?

I don't want to have to touch this computer again.

This person will undoubtedly need help and if they can't help themselves you will be the one helping them. Mint is best-case for ease of use so your requirements are a bit contradictory.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Every time I've tried Kubuntu it's been a mess. Though it's been a couple years since I subjected myself to it. It's still going to use Snaps, so there's that.

If they want bulletproof and up to date, Fedora KDE.

[-] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago

That's what I did

[-] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago
[-] data1701d@startrek.website 2 points 5 days ago

OP explicitly said Mint isn’t what they’re looking for.

[-] sonalder@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

ZorinOS or the recent AnduinOS can be very Windows like with modernish windows sex appeal as you call it.

Edit: If a gamer you could add Nobara with its own theme or bazzite with KDE.

[-] spooky2092 1 points 4 days ago

I started with Bazzite recently after getting a recommendation to go with a SilverBlue derived distro, and other than trying to figure out my own issues, it's been pretty smooth.

I do have a weird issue that crops up after reboot where the display environment variable isn't exported or something. But considering I also had an issue with my steam library not loading that was user error, I'm not entirely sure that isn't of my own making as well...

[-] Ashiette@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

You have had many answers, all of them revolving around Debian / Ubuntu. Yet it doesn't give the "like-windows" esperience. It's More like "slightly windows-flavored Linux".

For a more Windows-like Linux, which helped me transition easily because I retained muscle memory, is Zorin OS.

[-] tisktisk@piefed.social 4 points 6 days ago

Kubuntu is excellent for the stability imo. Super sane and low-demand defaults make for a reliable/enjoyable experience
I only use gentoo now so I can't offer suggestions other than maybe alpine for servers

[-] doomsdayrs@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Fedora Atomic (immutable OS), install it and you can swap between Atomic, Kinoite, Bazzite, and any other atomic distribution easily.

[-] Neptr 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Fedora KDE edition or OpenSUSE Tumbleweed/Slowroll. Otherwise could try Aurora.

I avoid Ubuntu base because it is slow to update packages, and the inclusion of Snap packages are a no from me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago

I think you should cruise this guy's channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCg6gPGh8HU2U01vaFCAsvmQ

He's very fair and uses all operating systems. I'm almost certain he's had a video on this exact question.

[-] merde@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

I personally like mint and pop!os for new users, but for this user I want to try something windows like with more sex appeal.

what don't you mean by "sex appeal"?

[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

They want this person to be sexually attracted to their computer.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
61 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

54260 readers
426 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS