344
all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works 81 points 6 days ago

Anyone still buying Nintendo products at this point isn't paying attention.

[-] yggstyle@lemmy.world 34 points 6 days ago

I see Nintendo emulation / mod chipping / console hacking I support it. Toxic company deserves a return in kind for its abuse of its fanbase.

[-] warmaster@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago

At this point, I guess they are either ignorant, unethical, or they are just lying to themselves because they can't resist the temptation to play their games.

[-] yggstyle@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Look I don't fault developers for kissing the ring. I know and have spoken with multiple devs at different Nintendo affiliated companies and they don't enjoy it either but it lets them make the games they love for the people that they want to entertain.

I can't say I support hating a full group of people because that's not great either. "... except for the Amish but it'll never get back to them" - John Pinette

[-] warmaster@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

In my case, I don't hate them. I respect those devs, people have to put food on their tables somehow, and this way isn't one of the worst... I just believe that by doing so, we are helping to perpetuate vicious corporativism.

[-] yggstyle@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Nintendo isn't just the nestle of companies to users... they are the same or worse to their own.

I've seen people lose teams over errant comments about a novel idea for the IP they would love to see happen, or maybe even be developing as a passion project, purged for the notion that they were anything more than drones.

It's a disgusting work culture taking advantage of bright eyed developers that grew up with fond memories of the brand. I genuinely love some of the IP and worlds made by the developers - but I will never, ever, spend a fucking penny on that company until it is changed.

[-] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

I‘ll still buy their controller because you can‘t sue Chinese companies either so what‘s the difference? However I‘ll use it for PC gaming. No way I‘m going back to their ecosystem. Those days are gone.

[-] TAG@lemmy.world 26 points 5 days ago

What sort of half assed reporting came up with this story? This is not a new policy. If I remember right, Nintendo added a forced arbitration clause to their EULA about 10 years ago (I would try to find an exact date, but Google is flooded with articles parroting this story).

It came up with regards to Joy-Con drift in 2017: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/washington/wawdce/2:2020cv01694/292704/21/

Should companies be allowed to force arbitration as a shield against all law suits? Hell fucking no, but their lawyers say they can, so any company with a EULA written by a half decent lawyer includes the wording.

At this point, the only reason anyone would complain that a company includes the clause is rage bait.

[-] Adalast@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

I was so happy to go through the Steam EULA and find that it explicitly states that all disputes will be heard in the court local to the customers.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 6 points 5 days ago

That was a recent change, and it's still anti-consumer. It's an attempt to block class action suits.

[-] BrazenSigilos@ttrpg.network 2 points 4 days ago

Yeah, if I recall the change was because so many people took them to arbitration at the same time that the cost wasn't worth it, so they changed the policy to 'local court' to avoid the situation repeating while also sidestepping any large class action attempts.

There's a good chance that clause won't hold up in court, but proving that would require a lot of time and money.

[-] TAG@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Exactly why they put it. You would first need to win a trial to get the clause voided and then win another trial to get actual damages or you can go to arbitration and get a modest settlement. Most people will take the latter.

This shit never holds up in court - you can’t just sign rights away by clicking “accept” on a EULA. This is a scare tactic designed to stop people before they ever try because “well it says i can’t do that in the eula.”

If Nintendo give you a reason to sue them, sue the ever loving shit out of those greedy corporate fucks.

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Fair.

I may have been thinking about articles I’ve read about the EU and how they don’t tolerate this particular brand of corpo overreach, my apologies and thank you for the correction.

God I wish I lived in a sane country.

[-] Yermaw@lemm.ee 8 points 5 days ago

Remember the "Disney can legally kill your wife" memes?

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 5 days ago

Jokes on them, no one reads that shit!

[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 40 points 6 days ago

Don't worry Nintendo, even as someone who grew up on SMB, you've thoroughly convinced me to never do business with you ever again. Not even nostalgia...

[-] DevotedShitStain69@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

Just how an NDA won't protect a(n) person/entity from legal repercussions when committing crimes from being "leaked" doesn't mean it'll hold in court, just how these highly illegal and predatory EULAs shouldn't either. There's a reason why this bullshit only happens in America, this EULA elsewhere wouldn't work unless it's modified to not contain this blatant shit of a thing. It's a shame we're the few dumb enough to allow our own downfall while parading our aggressors. 🫠🫠🫠

[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 22 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)
[-] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 17 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Wow Nintendo is really quadrupling down on being absolutely shitty! Love that I have a Steam Deck instead of a Switch because I'm never buying from these assholes again. I loved a ton of their franchises and have spent thousands of dollars on Nintendo consoles and games, but I'm fed up with their greed.

[-] A1kmm@lemmy.amxl.com 12 points 5 days ago

"Except for Claims (i) in which a party is attempting to protect its intellectual property rights (such as its patent, copyright, trademark, trade secret, anti-circumvention, or moral rights, but not including its privacy or publicity rights) ..."

So in other words, the types of matters Nintendo thinks it might have a dispute against users, court and class actions are okay, but for everything that they think users might file against Nintendo, they think arbitration is best.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago
[-] Goretantath@lemm.ee 6 points 6 days ago

Welp, fuck playing online anymore, just buying a switch 2 to hack it..

[-] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 days ago

Don't give these assholes any more money.

this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
344 points (100.0% liked)

Games

38573 readers
967 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS