673

Tesla has confirmed it has given up on plans to make a Cybertruck range extender to achieve the range it originally promised on the electric pickup truck.

It started refunding deposits for the $16,000 extra battery pack.

When Tesla unveiled the production version of the Cybertruck in late 2023, two main disappointments were the price and the range.

The tri-motor version, the most popular in reservation tallies before production, was supposed to have over 500 miles of range and start at $70,000.

Tesla now sells the tri-motor Cybertruck for $100,000 and only has a range of 320 miles.

The dual-motor Cybertruck was supposed to cost $50,000 and have over 300 miles of range. In reality, it starts at $80,000 and has 325 miles of range.

Archive link: https://archive.is/CGbaE

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 159 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

"Thanks for all the $16k loans at 0% shmucks. We've kept the interest we made while rates have been up and now you can have it back while they're dropping. Of course, your money is now worth less than it was when you gave it to us during high inflation. Suck it losers. Love, T E S L A"

EDIT: deposit was $150. Still shitty but not the same impact

EDIT 2: Or $2000? ... tl;dr: shitty

[-] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 40 points 2 months ago

Enjoy your overpriced truck that under delivers. At least you look COOL™.

[-] piskertariot@lemmy.world 38 points 2 months ago

The deposit for a cyberstuck was $150. The package was valued at $16k.

Being happy about lies being exposed is good, but spreading a false narrative about it is bad.

[-] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Ah I misread this

It started refunding deposits for the $16,000 extra battery pack.

You are correct. People make mistakes, not everything is "a narrative".

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] drislands@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

I doubt the deposits were for the full cost, right?

[-] WR5@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

If they were for any price, this is still true.

[-] FelixCress@lemmy.world 103 points 2 months ago

However, Tesla had devised a solution to bring the range closer to what it originally announced: a separate battery pack that sits in the truck’s bed. Tesla called it a “range extender.” It costs $16,000 and takes up a third of the Cybertruck’s bed.

You cannot make this shit up 😂

[-] KingGordon@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago

Imagine how easy it would be to be if elongated muskrat kept his mouth shut.

[-] cardfire@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

Is St Elmo's Fire made of Li-Ion or Life-Po?

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 85 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The dual motor was originally announced to be US$39,900, not 50,000. It is lies all the way down at Tesla.

[-] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 39 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I was seriously considering it back then. My wife hated the look and wouldn't let me even consider it, but as someone who likes Back to the Future and Tron, I didn't hate the aesthetic, though it took some getting used to. And I want a comfortably large EV (my compact is too small for my old bones) with 500 miles to avoid range anxiety. A 100 mile distance in the middle of a midwestern winter without a charger at the other end is going to require 500 miles of range to get back home due to heating the battery and cabin, and driving at 80mph. And my longest daily commute was 212 miles round trip before someone asks how often I need to drive 100 miles away in the middle of winter.

I wouldn't say bullet dodged because I was never really close to getting one, but charging three times the price for only 60% range compared to that announcement is fucking insane.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The dual motor was originally announced at 50k

Single motor rear-wheel drive with 250 miles of range, 7,500-pound towing capacity, and 0–60 mph capabilities in under 6.5 seconds, for $39,900

Dual motor all-wheel drive with 300 miles of range, 10,000-pound towing capacity, and 0–60 mph in under 4.5 seconds for $49,900
[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

$39,900? Not $40,000? Does Elon still think that old "99" trick still works?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] trk@aussie.zone 48 points 2 months ago

Tesla and unfulfilled promises.... Only slightly less an iconic duo than Tesla bad news and stock price going up.

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago

How about giving up on the Cybertruck

[-] utopiah@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago
[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

Why the switch to a black hat? Was it to easy for people to see?

[-] mle86@feddit.org 20 points 2 months ago

How hard can it be to produce a simple battery pack, for a company that is in the business of designing and producing battery packs no less...

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

$16.000 just to get what you paid for?

Some people sure have a lot of money to spend.

[-] lmuel@sopuli.xyz 13 points 2 months ago

Not quite.

$16k to get closer to what they promised lol Probably won’t do that much considering the added weight

[-] SpicyLizards@reddthat.com 19 points 2 months ago

"Tesla confirms it has given up" is the headline I want

[-] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago

The only true PR statement they could release.

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 14 points 2 months ago

Why the third motor? One for each of the front wheels and one for the rear?

[-] endeavor@sopuli.xyz 59 points 2 months ago

One runs front wheels, one runs rear wheels and third one powers the mental gymnastics it takes to be a tesla owner in 2025.

[-] DoubleSpace@lemm.ee 13 points 2 months ago

Two in the back, one in the front. There's also a two and four motor version.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Two in the back, one in the front.

The Shocker

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 5 points 2 months ago

That makes even less sense. Distributing mechanical power on non steering wheels is easy, but for steering wheels requires a more complex and expensive coupling, as well as power losses. Just... why?

[-] _stranger_@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I believe the three motor versions is to add extra power under load to the rear wheels. (A weight/power/range compromise between the 4 and 2 motor versions).

The motors are essentially in line with the wheels (they have gearing but it's minimal and internal to the motor housing, not attached like an automatic transmission would be, if that makes sense.)

The "three motor" design is just the single motor design up front and the dual motor design in the back.

I'm not sure if they ever actually released the single motor version though.

[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

extra power under load to the rear wheels

Lol like there's enough room back there to add a load.

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 5 points 2 months ago

It's supposed to tow. In theory.

[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago
[-] twice_hatch@midwest.social 2 points 2 months ago

I've seen arcade games built tougher than the interior of that POS lol

[-] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

The load of getting this brick up to speed quickly so the driver can show off

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 3 points 2 months ago

Basically they use the same size motor everywhere, and your total torque and power is dependent on how many you've got?

[-] _stranger_@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

pretty much. I believe all the cars use the same motor except for the plaid versions (or maybe just the S plaid?) that has a different motor that's designed to hit higher rpm's

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

It could be $15 and have the range of an ICBM, it can still sit on the lot and scare the kids walking by.

[-] ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago

Surprised they haven’t given up on Musk

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Why implement a new feature for a product nobody is buying?

[-] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 8 points 2 months ago

Is anybody still holding Tesla shares?

[-] overload@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 months ago
[-] DrBob@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

I have an older comment that goes through Tesla's litany of woes and the stock goes up with every piece of bad news. It is being supported by something other than reality.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago

Longer range so it can get stuck further from home? 🤭😀👍

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

So, anyway, anyone seen any good movies or anything?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
673 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

73370 readers
4375 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS