877
submitted 1 day ago by not_IO to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago

SpaceX and all of Musk’s companies have received many tens of billions in government contracts, subsidies, and incentives and more are on the way.

The meme is right, but it’s WAY short of the amount of money SpaceX is getting.

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago
[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

musk is "a ponszi"

[-] xzot746@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 day ago

Defund the parasite Musk, or since he is all about free speech maybe he should provide some funding to them.

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Look… I hate Musk as much as anyone. But SpaceX contracts are not the same as NPR grants.

[-] Gladaed@feddit.org 1 points 14 hours ago

Yep, and comparing expenditures that differ in orders of magnitude is also complicated. Why is it even worth to cut the lower one when minor changes to the big one have a bigger gain.

The issue is most cuts being deeply political in nature. In my mind these posts only shift the narrative.

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Hopefully, you don't mind coming across as a "bootlicker".

NPR shouldn't be losing anything, is the point.

[-] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Nor should PBS

Dude isn't an American, he didn't didn't grow up with PBS- he's not from here, he definitely doesn't understand the cultural significance of PBS in the United States.

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

I couldn’t mind less. A sad little ad hominem like that from someone stupid enough to see it that way is no skin off my nose.

[-] not_IO 19 points 1 day ago

this is all stuff that nasa would do for cheaper instead, if they got the contracts instead.

cheaper because you wouldnt have to finance making him rich

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You know NASA uses all kinds of private contractors too, right? Which means they are paying the “make someone rich” tax as well, just not to Musk.

[-] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

That means we fix the loopholes and find a streamlined way to reach efficiency. It doesn't mean we exploit the system because "well they do it too" while continuing to complain the system sucks. No, we actually fix the standing problems within our systems. Thats what should happen.

Tax the fucking rich.

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Tax the fucking rich

Of course I agree but I don’t know how we got here from saying that NPR grants have nothing to do with aerospace contracting.

[-] AngrySquirrel@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

The space shuttle was a mistake, but that is a laughably disingenuous route to claim that NASA couldn't be doing these things for cheaper than private companies. Saturn V rocket launches were cheaper than space shuttle launches.

yeah but the falcon 9 and heavy are the cheapest ever compared to everything

I hate musk, don't misunderstand me, but spaceX has done some incredible things with rocket reusability

[-] nialv7@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I mean, we should be able to hate Elon Musk while still respect the fact that, SpaceX as a company has done incredible things.

You say NASA could've done it for cheaper, but their track record is not great. Apollo program, historical, but was very expensive. Then the Space Shuttle, then the SLS, they are all extremely expensive compared to, not just Falcon 9, but also Russia or China's offerings.

I hate Musk but I am also passionate about space... So yeah, I don't know how to process this. Maybe it's fine for people to just believe SpaceX did nothing good as long as that gets more people to hate Musk... I really don't know (help me)

[-] redwattlebird@lemmings.world 1 points 22 hours ago

NASA is a government program, Space X is private enterprise first of all. And what exactly has incredible things has space Space X actually done?

One got us to the moon and back.

One has contributed an amazing amount of information about the universe to us.

One has made it cheaper by recycling rockets, which is not something amazing but largely driven by private enterprise wanting to create a service to gain a profit and return for investors.

They're both chalk and cheese. NASA doesn't have to do it for cheaper because they're not about making profits. They're not a company.

A better comparison would be to compare Space X to that other space company by that other billionaire.

this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
877 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

8000 readers
2301 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS