786
People, RISE UP (r.50501.chat)

Originally Posted By u/serious_bullet5 At 2025-05-05 02:29:05 PM | Source


top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee 26 points 2 days ago

I swear to God, people spend more time blaming Democrats for not fighting Republicans well enough than they do Republicans for doing things that need fighting.

[-] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 days ago

The ire has to do with the representative government where the representatives are not representing.

Which would, in fact, prevent Republicans from doing things that need to be fought.

[-] epicstove@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 days ago

When representatives in democracy aren't representing. You kinda lose democracy.

[-] RymrgandsDaughter@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

That's because after watching mitch McConnell do literally fucking anything he wanted for years, Democratic leaders and the DNC have the audacity to whine about not being able to do anything.

All so Cuck Schumer can suck off Netanyahu.

I hate republicans, and conservatives in general. They are worse than vermin. But democrats deserve a ton of hate for how badly everything is going. The DNC allowed this to happen, Biden failed his oath of office, allowing Trump to even get on the ticket. The Supreme Court straight up granting immunity to Presidents meant that he could have and should have done everything in his power force them to reverse that because that shit isn't in the constitution.

[-] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

McConnell managed that because Republicans vote in lock step on basically everything. That's not the DNC's fault.

[-] WraithGear@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

That is explicitly the dnc’s fault

[-] Nalivai@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Democrats tend to follow rules. That's kind of their thing. When society prefers those who aren't following rules, and explicitly and implicity give them power, the power imbalance is undeniable.
Unfortunately, if Democrats stop following rules, it will make them not worth giving power, power corrupts and all that.
So while it's very nice to push all the blame on them, the only group of people who actually responsible is that quarter of Americans that still didn't lost their minds. Their job was to elect nit monsters and continue to push them to the right direction. Instead they elected monsters into all the power and now are surprised why monsters have all the power.

[-] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Americans love to complain but hate to take action.

[-] Khaliso@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 days ago

I mean, what's the larger problem: the operator of the orphan crushing machine, or the guy that won't try to stop them because there's a 'no trespassing' sign on the lawn?

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Every single day it seems more and more that a French style revolution is the only solution

[-] Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The elephant in the room is that people are stupid and politics is about winning them over by any means. There are only winners and losers and nobody cares how you win when you get immunity and can start doling out lucrative government contracts.

The jackass in the room doesn't realize that you have to really manipulate the dummies and do some serious showmanship so that you can get the real policies you want implemented that give more money and power to your side whilst simultaneously pulling the rug out from the other side, draining their capacity to resist by barraging them with stupid bullshit that consumes their money, power and influence for things that generally have no impact to 99% of people beyond a psychological one.

[-] Wilco@lemm.ee 24 points 2 days ago

You forgot to add the corporations raining down money on both sides to keep things this way.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Are people not paying attention, or just love to blame Democrats? They’re not asking for compromises. They’re making clear demands and getting voted down. Most recently, the House Judiciary Committee voted on the deportations. Democrats insisted that citizens be exempt from deportation. Republicans voted them down. This is what happens when you have full Republican control of our government. Keep bitching about the minority party fighting for you, and this is here to stay.

You want fresh blood in the seats? Me too. Vote in the congressional midterm primaries next year. We all have a say in who sits in those seats, but only the elderly retirees show up for the vote.

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago

And they’ve been sitting on their hands for years even when they did have power. They routinely allow this shit to happen and it’s a little late to say them asking if maybe US citizens could be exempt shows how great they really are. Like, they should be demanding that any deportation needs far better scrutiny, and that would right there take care of the citizen part while also protecting so many others. It’s basically the meme we’re commenting on!

They aren’t protecting the US from shit, and it fucking shows. Your country is bad and you should feel bad, not be making excuses and complaining about Democrats not getting respect for unsuccessfully doing the bare minimum and then saying “guess that’s that.”

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

The only time in the last 30 years that Democrats had the same control that Republicans have now, was the 111th Congress. It was considered the most productive Congress since the 89th Congress.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/111th_United_States_Congress

[-] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 3 days ago

Joe Biden took office directly after J6, allowed Garland to pull pud for four years, then got the biggest fucking stick an American president has ever gotten from the SC, and handed it to Trump.

I feel the Dems can take some blame.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 11 points 3 days ago

Democrats should have demanded the removal of most of the republican party from office via the 14th amendment. Refuse to cooperate with this illegitimate government.

[-] EldritchFeminity 4 points 2 days ago

100% of Dems voted in favor of Trump's first 2 picks for his cabinet, despite spending hours upon hours grilling them and talking about how unfit for the jobs they are.

It was only after they started getting outraged calls in the thousands per day compared to the usual 30 that they started voting against Trump's cabinet.

Look at Schumer and Pelosi. Or the party appointing a man practically on his deathbed over fresh blood to one of the most important positions in the party. A man who had to resign 4 months later, IIRC.

The Dems only offer up any real resistance when they're forced to by us. Otherwise, they vote no, voice a few complaints, and then go about their day like it's any other.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] The_Caretaker@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago

So what about 2021 - 2022, when the Dems had the Senate, the House and the Presidency? Where was the push to codify Roe v Wade? Why didn't they put Trump in prison, pending trial? There were dozens of things they could have done when they had power. The don't want to do any of the things they SAY they want to do. They want to ask for campaign donations to fight the MAGAs but they don't actually want to fight. They're scammers.

[-] orcrist@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago

You talk about blaming people but that's a waste of our time. We actually want to make things better in the future, and to do that you need to look at how we got to where we are, and it's clear that we got here by corporate Democrats caving to Republican and corporate interests. That's been going on for the past 30 years. Of course the Republicans are more to blame than the democrats, but if you can't recognize that the old Washington Democrats are largely worthless sandbags, then there's no way you're going to make things better in the future. They simply lack the values that we have, they don't actually want to make life better for the average American, and that's never going to change.

If you want to ask what more the Democrats can do, I think there are a ton of good examples. They can obstruct the process in so many ways, they can have independent press conferences, they can generate a ton of PR by creating videos for Facebook and YouTube and TikTok. They can go visit prisoners held in Central America. Just go look at what the active newer generation of Democrats are doing, go look at what Bernie Sanders does, and ask yourself why we don't have hundreds of people doing that every day. Quite simply, we don't see that in large numbers because most of those people have s***** values. Most of them are out to protect their own power and their own seat and that's it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

There will never be enough fresh blood.

Even if the democrats were all progressives and had 100% of the entire government things are too fucked to be fixed before the collapse.

Also, I vote in every primary and they always lose. Turns out we’re just a conservative country.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Only 22% of the nation voted for Trump. Many of them already regret their votes. Trump won on the apathy of the majority. Defeatism is simply fuel for that fire.

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] mriswith@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They're not doing anything because they are complicit. The DNC and the majority of Democrats are completely fine with fascism as long as it does not impact themselves.

It's not even a question anymore, every single House Democrat proved it recently by voting in favor of the "Take it Down" act.

[-] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

It’s not even a question anymore, every single House Democrat proved it recently by voting in favor of the “Take it Down” act.

everyone voted for that except 2 republicans lol

this includes AOC, and i think bernie sanders, some didnt vote at all

[-] sad_detective_man 17 points 3 days ago

imagine functioning as controlled opposition while not even being controlled opposition. those desk jobs are way too fucking nice

[-] Pyr0@lemm.ee 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

We all need to do what we can do to fight back including civil disobedience. One of the most powerful but unfortunately forgotten ways of fighting back is protesting. The powers at be don’t like it because they have no control of the information. Reddit perm banned me for being too outspoken. So here I am. Please people rise up and get loud!!!

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Absolutely. Republicans aren’t afraid of losing their seats with 5M people in the streets nationwide. We need a lot more of us to scare them into dissent.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

If you assume that Republicans will ever compromise, it makes an ass out of you and me.

[-] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Unpopular opinion: The problem is the people, roughly 30%-40% of them but continuing to grow, and their inability to cope with modern propaganda herding techniques through big data, social networks, and now AI.

What we have today are governments, whether they be two party or more, being divided into the ideological parties, those willing to operate within the framing and intent of their constitutions, to those willing to game it. Those willing to game it and those attracted to oligarchs and easy lobby wealth only seem to have an ideological factor to them because they adopt the political ideologies of least resistance - which they will gladly go back on, and have done so as their attempts to game the system have led them to the sort of voter menagerie they have now.

People blaming the "democratic party", in this context the US democratic party, are ignorant enough to not realize that a "party" in the US is just a donor list to finance candidate race's for congress and that it is very easy for a corrupt candidate to run for the "party" in states where it is beneficial for them to do so - as long as they can cajole that list of donors long enough. This isn't like some other countries where being part of a party actually means something. In the US, both parties have a significant degree of corruption, and it was already arguably an oligarchy.

But within the democratic party, due to the aforementioned biases, it has less members willing to outright game the government and more of those operating from an ideological basis. An ideological basis is basically the only thing a government can be built around, once parties start getting in that don't operate from an ideological bases, you are just voting on who scams you. Yet nowadays the portion of those action from an ideological position within the US government is no longer the majority. There was even a rift in the Republican party a few years ago, and because it is inherently the party dominated by those most willing to game to government instead of serve it, it was MAGA that won out.

More to the point, an ideological basis limits what candidates do to working within the constitution and actual good faith.

So people blaming the democrats are people who have a deluded world view, blaming a governing minority party who by their very nature will operate in a handicapped ideological fashion versus a dominant authoritarian insurgency willing to do anything to game the system and make it that much more subservient. They are the sort of people who think they will still get fair elections for the midterms and subsequent elections, and they don't realize their democracy is now over and that what they will need is either secession into a new governing entity (not going to happen any time soon, because today's Americans can't comprehend things like the UK being able to leave the EU and the EU and UK continuing to exist and having that be the normal way federal and state interactions could occur, never mind the shadow of debt being a chain to the central government) or a Civil War (and while Americans will virtue signal all the way to kingdom come, it is in their ignorance, those countries that were democracies but are today authoritarian states, that shows most of society will be quite willing to bend the knee - if US society were for some reason different than the rest Trump wouldn't have gotten so far).

At a personal level, what people can do and will do is resistance, and be honest, let me ask you, supposing 1/3 of the US was doing the same effort, the same investment at resisting that you, personally are doing right now, given that 1/3 are inert "undecideds" more likely to get caught and the other 1/3 is MAGA, and keeping in mind that the authoritarian government is operating outside of society and is choosing to game it, what change would you really affect? How about we make it an even easier question? What if the authoritarian was a foreign monarch in Europe with an ocean of distance between them and you, if the most advanced form of travel was by ship and there was no AI, no big data, no social network herding, no instant communication, if your actions right now were representative of what the rest of society was doing, how much of a change would they be likely to make?

[-] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

1/3 of people don't vote. They are disenfranchised or politically apathetic. 2/3 of people are propagandized or coerced into voting for parties that don't serve anything besides capital, greed, and their own lust for power.

We need a new system. The concept of "political parties" is harmful to human progress. We don't need people on imaginary teams playing tug of war with each other while the world burns.

What we do need is strong and principled leadership, that is not poisoned by capital or team politics, that is motivated towards improving the planet and actually working to solving critical issues instead of worrying incessantly about "cost" at every single step.

There's no need to play the blame game, but if we want a future that is not undesirable, it necessitates positive action and a willingness to identify what is blocking or stagnating us as a species.

[-] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

So, no real solution, just more and even vaguer ideology versus an authoritarian regime. I'll be sure to materialize this positive action out of my ass to help out.

[-] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

When the shelves are empty because everything comes from China or relies on imports from China, when there is a food crisis and people are sent to the fields because Trump deported a significant chunk of our agricultural labor force (40% of US agricultural workers are undocumented immigrants), when people become unable to afford groceries and other essentials, and so forth - that is the moment that change will happen.

Trump et. al have already done so many things that are blatantly against the law. Contempt of court and not respecting his oath to uphold the constitution being the least of them. Where are the Democrats when you need them? Writing strongly-worded letters to Trump?

The obvious solution is to stop playing games, stop waiting for the Democrats to save us, and seize the moment. That includes creating a real American democracy.

[-] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Because food crisis are so reliable at taking down authoritarian regimes. The democrats are at the same place people are, working within the system and the designated ways to protest and expecting change to suddenly come out miraculously out of their virtuosity. The US hope is basically that the authoritarian in power is too incompetent to keep it when they've been preparing for this for several years now. It's not a bad plan if it were only Trump, unfortunately it's far bigger than him now.

If we are going to be vaguely idealistic, the obvious solution is for all things bad to stop so that all things that are good grow into things that are more good.

[-] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I wish the Democrats, and the people who trust them to save them, the best.

I've just been told too many lies and seen the American people been gaslit too much.

There have been too many atrocities that Democrats have directly enabled, there are crises in every area of the human experience, and what they are overall proposing to address those issues and the consequences of their past inaction and misbehavior is inadequate.

When Democrats start taking substantive legal action en-masse against this administration, like they do against third parties, I'll be more open to the idea that they aren't complicit or apathetic.

Vague protests about oligarchy aren't sufficient to deal with oligarchy. We can't even get them to back universal healthcare, how can they fight oligarchy?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
786 points (100.0% liked)

/r/50501 Mirror

946 readers
1070 users here now


Mirrored /r/50501 Popular Posts


founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS