229
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ClassStruggle@lemmy.world 94 points 3 days ago

She will run, and the DNC will sheepdog her like they did Bernie, keeping everyone herded up in the party until they realized they got fucked over, again.

[-] mercano@lemmy.world 61 points 3 days ago

Bernie’s being doing some rallies with her recently. If I were to guess, Bernie’s not going to run for POTUS again, he’s going to endorse her.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago

Bernie could get the VP nod.

[-] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 days ago

If we could stop floating ancient and/or billionaires, that would be greeeaat.

[-] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 days ago

Bernie is the one exception though. The only exception.

[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

I love Bernie and I would vote for him if he were on the ballot, but he has no business being president at this age. I think he recognizes that and that's why he's actively helping the new generation.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

he has no business being president at this age

Things we can say now that biden is no longer running.

[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

You ain't wrong, but I said the same thing about him. Almost exactly. The biggest difference is I wouldn't have to hold my nose to vote for Bernie, I genuinely like the dude and my policy quibbles come down to quibbles.

Rant incoming.

Hell, the DNC may run Bernie now that he's old enough. Or they'll pick a cop to lead the ticket where their side doesn't like or trust the police. Anything as long as they don't win. Their last big winners were Obama and Clinton, both of which were in their 40s. Can't make that fucking mistake again I guess. Even on the R side it's been middle aged people rather than geriatric motherfuckers since Reagan until Trump. When the fuck did someone decide that you can't be president unless you were a billion years old? I want someone who represents the future and wants to take us there, not someone whose slogan is "I've seen the future, and it's a better past....which I also saw because I lived through all of human history".

[-] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 2 points 2 days ago

Personally, I prefer Bernie as the main - we need as many years of progressive presidencies as possible. Having 8 of them with him as the lead, and another 8 of AOC, would be a good start to reforming America. Odds are, though, we will simply have AOC replace Bernie during one of his terms. VPs are meant to be backups for when a president isn't able to hold office anymore.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I would prefer Bernie as the main too, but given his age and heart condition, that's not viable. :(

[-] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 2 points 2 days ago

I have the impression the thing that determines an election, isn't age nor ability, but the possession of a lively personality. I would say that Bernie has enough personality to bury Krasnov.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 17 points 3 days ago

And both she and liberals will still keep defending the party after it.

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 20 points 3 days ago

Yes, she's never questioned the party leadership or directions. :rolls eyes:

She'd be better in party leadership and not pursue the Presidency (yet).

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth 86 points 3 days ago

I want AOC to be President, but I think Americans are too sexist to vote for her. We're a callow, superficial people.

[-] simplejack@lemmy.world 41 points 3 days ago

We also thought Americans were too racist to vote for a black man.

IMHO, Americans will always prioritize swagger, the ability to clearly call bullshit, and the ability to generate hype and a sense of connection.

This is why Americans vote for celebrities and actors.

[-] HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth 5 points 3 days ago

I kind of see where you're coming from - there's an imperfect fungibility of bigotry. If you're bigoted against one kind of person, it's not hard to make you bigoted against another, it just takes a little propaganda.

But it's not a secret that young men broke for Trump by over 10%. I attribute that swing to the manosphere podcast circuit working round the clock this past election, and Elon Musk purchasing voters with his "sweepstakes."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_States_presidential_election#Exit_poll

2020, Biden: 81,283,501 2020, Trump: 74,223,975

2024, Harris: 75,017,613 2024, Trump: 77,302,580

These numbers suggest that not only did more people vote for Trump than in 2020, even after living through the fucked COVID response, even after seeing January 6, more people chose not to vote at all. And it's a 50/50 split: Trump converted 3 million votes from Biden, and 3 million more just stayed home.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 7 points 3 days ago

Not sure about that. I agree americans love the celerberties but Think women's rights vs black men right to vote. Black men had more rights before women for like 50 years. Its gonna be a bit for the old folks to die off and even then we got those Tate trolls trying to keep status quo.

Also Obama wasn't even "full black" and that was too much for some people. Probably sooner see a Hispanic dude than a full black guy or a woman. Its gonna be like that scene in head of state with people running to polls to stop Chris rock.

[-] simplejack@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Maybe, but women do win places that have a lot of dumb misogynists. I think the ability to connect with voters, or voters wanting to be associated with someone interesting and cool, has a lot of power.

And at the end of the day, if you look at the folks who are right of center in the US, they’ve elected twice as many women as people of color.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 16 points 3 days ago

This line is coming from neoliberals who can't understand why Hillary and Kamala lost and are blaming sexism because they can't come to terms with the fact that the American people are turning away from the establishment in its entirety.

Yes, sexism is a problem in America. No, it is not why liberals are losing.

[-] HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth 4 points 3 days ago

American people are turning away from the establishment in its entirety.

Biden won 2020, and I think it's safe to say he was fairly establishment.

Edit: And as much as we want to forget, Trump was President of the United States from 2016 to 2020. He IS an establishment candidate. He wants the establishment of an authoritarian fascist regime that unlawfully, violently silences his critics and imprisons or murders the minority group of his choosing.

Call me what you like, but I think you have more in common with me than with MAGA. And if your IFF is malfunctioning, well, I hope you get it checked out soon.

[-] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 5 points 3 days ago

Biden won 2020, and I think it's safe to say he was fairly establishment.

Barely, and only coming out of Trump's first term that had many people looking for a "return to normal." The Democratic party will never succeed running another Biden every election. The people can see that the status quo is not working for them, and they're fed up with corporate dems telling them that we need to preserve the status quo at all costs.

Call me what you like, but I think you have more in common with me than with MAGA. And if your IFF is malfunctioning, well, I hope you get it checked out soon.

I didn't call you anything. I can see that you're my friend, but the establishment and all the politicians who fight to preserve it instead of fighting the fascists in power are foes, and the sooner you realize that the sooner we can work together to change it.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

I want AOC to be president, and think that the "Americans are too sexist to vote for a woman (now that a progressive woman might run)" argument is being used to hold back all women in order to hold back one woman.

[-] ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee 10 points 3 days ago

Not all of us. Dudes for AOC!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] altphoto@lemmy.today 9 points 3 days ago

I also want AOC to be president....starting now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Goretantath@lemm.ee 55 points 3 days ago

I want Tim as president and AOC as vice since I dont want to risk the bunch of idiots who wont vote for a woman fucking everything up again.

[-] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 44 points 3 days ago

Kamala's campaign wasn't fucked because she's a woman, it was fucked because she's a careerist who doesn't believe in anything.

[-] Xanza@lemm.ee 36 points 3 days ago

Two things can be true.

I know a lot of women who didn't vote for her because she was a woman. Shit is crazy to me, but that doesn't mean it's not the reality. I'm sure there are a shocking number of people who didn't vote for her because she's a woman.

Yeah, conservative women are a really odd breed. I live in the Deep South, which means I get to actually interact with all of the hardline conservatives on a regular basis. I have 100% heard the “I just think a woman’s place is to follow her husband” rhetoric from women.

[-] Doorbook@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Those will vote Republican anyway...

[-] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 6 points 3 days ago

I highly doubt that the number of people who claim the fact that she's a woman is the reason they didn't vote for her is anywhere near high enough to swing the election. Even if it were, those people are not worth conceding to. There are far more people for whom her gender is irrelevant but did not vote for her due to a myriad of other reasons than there are brain-dead morons who think women just aren't cut out to be president.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

As a person who has a lived experience as a woman in this country I wholeheartedly disagree.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Xanza@lemm.ee 8 points 3 days ago

This is the ideal progressive ticket, IMO. It's not as scary for the mid as having a female President (grow the fuck up, guys), but she'll still be able to provide her support and opinion far above her current station. People seem to really like Tim, which is great.

But in the end none of it matters. They're all historically pro-Israel and people don't forget that. They've begun to change their tune, but only just now. It seems disingenuous to get votes, which just seems...hollow.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cephus@lemmy.world 44 points 3 days ago

I'd rather she primary Schumer.

[-] Veedem@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago

That’s probably the more impactful move if she were to win.

[-] carlossurf@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 days ago
[-] whereisk@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

It seems to me that the US is unfortunately too “-ist” to elect AOC.

[-] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

AOC Pres with Tim Walz VP would be great

[-] watson387@sopuli.xyz 13 points 3 days ago
[-] 0x01@lemmy.ml 21 points 3 days ago

The verb choice of headlines is really a plague.

Slam, blast, hit, rip, and now swerve. Remarkable journalism.

[-] ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
229 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23339 readers
2412 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS