322
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 177 points 3 days ago

Publicly available factual information is a threat to an authoritarian regime

[-] grue@lemmy.world 105 points 3 days ago

Wikipedia, archive.org, and any similar essential services ought to be migrating their hosting and organizational headquarters to outside the US ASAP.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

That's not something you can just do. All of there employees are Americans.

It would be better if they were spread across many countries so that one place couldn't cause a problem.

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 53 points 3 days ago

They literally don't generate any revenue. Wikipedia is quite literally the definition of a non-profit.

Also, trump is barred from running non-profits due to fraud in NY, I feel like that should disqualify him from making these kinds of decisions.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 66 points 3 days ago

We have to protect Wikipedia. We have to.

[-] warbond@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago

If they take it down we'll make it again.

[-] variants_of_concern@lemmy.one 8 points 3 days ago

Gotta back it up

[-] 7toed@midwest.social 58 points 3 days ago

All you selfhosters out there, this is the cue to make your mirrors

[-] SoleInvictus 6 points 2 days ago

Just started, great suggestion.

I can't believe this shit. 2023 me wouldn't believe I'd be doing half of the things I'm doing now.

[-] 7toed@midwest.social 1 points 2 days ago

Just wait til 2025 you couldn't possibly believe what '27's got in stock :p

Though, any server schenanagins That may interest me for some hypotheical good in the world?

[-] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 3 days ago

Got my snapshot from Jan.

It's only 20gb.

You need an offline viewer. That's a snap /flat hub install. Kiwix I believe

[-] zer0squar3d@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 days ago

Says ~110gb for all of english version via kiwix. Did you exclude images or something?

[-] yonderer@lemm.ee 6 points 3 days ago

Yes, they’re are different versions. Maxi is the 110GB one, there is also a nopic version that is quite a bit lighter.

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No need

Install the free offline reader software from here

https://kiwix.org/en/

Then grab what content you want from https://dumps.wikimedia.org/kiwix/zim/

Here's English Wikipedia, with pictures from 2024 https://dumps.wikimedia.org/kiwix/zim/wikipedia/wikipedia_en_all_maxi_2024-01.zim

names with maxi have all the pictures names with mini few pictures and abridged content names with nopic have no pictures and abridged content

if it says science or basketball, it's just things flagged as science or things flagged as basketball.

[-] 7toed@midwest.social 2 points 2 days ago

Was weighing some options and think I'll be deploying this, thank you.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago

Does Wikipedia receive federal funding? If not, people can shut right up.

They're pretty flush with cash still. Trump can go after them, but for what? They'd need more corruption than they have in the judicial system today. They'll get there eventually, but they don't have it yet.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

It’s not that there is no danger, but I don’t see anything immediate.

[-] kittenzrulz123 16 points 3 days ago

We need a federated Wikipedia (Fedipedia)

[-] goldenbug@fedia.io 5 points 3 days ago
[-] kittenzrulz123 5 points 3 days ago
  1. It would allow multiple definitions for words (not eveyone agrees with what certain words mean)
  2. It would allow some instances to focus on being apolitical or more political.
  3. It would allow all wikis to be condenced into one platform (including possibly wikis like the Arch Wiki)
  4. It would help combat censorship
[-] goldenbug@fedia.io 7 points 3 days ago

For number one, there are articles that express different voices around a topic. Definitions often have multiple sections to express different voicws. Do they not?

I think a political project is a different beast from wikipedia. There will be some biases but not as its grounding purpose.

The consensus is somehow already constructed by the current set up. Most people just don't (and my feeling is that will and should not, like in the case of vaccine scienxe) participate.

Censorship of which kind, though?

[-] kittenzrulz123 2 points 3 days ago

I mean governments such as the Trump regime specifically in regard to information about politicians

[-] HenryBenry@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

The reason Wikipedia is so good is because they are forced to use the most correct words.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago

I feel like that is a mixed bag

It really isn't bad as is

[-] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 days ago

Is there any way to decentralize Wikipedia? P2P wikipedia? Because that seems like the best long term solution to this.

[-] 7toed@midwest.social 12 points 3 days ago

Yes, start with a mirror. A download is enough for yourself, but mirrors retain what is needed to rebuild the database. You will meed a lot of storage

[-] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

I torrented the text of english wikipedia one time and deleted it a few weeks after to make space for my Monero node. What I meant by "decentralized Wikipedia" would be not only the files being stored in multiple locations but there also being some sort of system (including moderation I suppose) to broadcast edits across the network

[-] 7toed@midwest.social 2 points 2 days ago

Wikipedia over IPFS, it seems to be a work in progress, but its something

[-] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

that's actually pretty cool, thanks!

[-] racketlauncher831@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago

I'll have to stop you right there, mate. You are reinventing blockchain.

[-] 7toed@midwest.social 2 points 2 days ago

It's more akin to torrenting really, I stumbled upon Wikipedia over IPFS

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago

How would that work?

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago

To be fair it is a little left leaning and the editors sometime massive jerks.

However, it really isn't bad at all. They do a pretty decent job of publishing factual information and Wikipedia is useful to a lot of people. Even if it was publishing propaganda they would still be protected under free speech. There are way more sketchy non profits than Wikipedia. It is kind of scaring that it is now a target

[-] Cheems@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Reality has a liberal bias

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It really doesn't

Bias is a truly human thing. It comes from applying emotions to facts. In reality there are no right answers and thus everything will always be biased.

this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
322 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

2567 readers
93 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS