401
submitted 3 days ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A family says their newborn son nearly bled to death and is fighting for his life after he was circumcised at a New York City hospital.

Tim and Gabrielle Groth said their son, Cole, underwent the circumcision at NewYork-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital in Manhattan, where he was born on March 31.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] blady_blah@lemmy.world 75 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Stop circumcising children. Let men decide if they want to be circumcised when they reach the age of consent at the age of 18. I guarantee circumcision will drop by 95% or more.

And if that's the case, that circumcision only exists if you don't give the boy the choice, then don't fucking force this on an infant!

[-] rmic@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Let's replace "curcumsising" with "imposing religion" to get the same result

[-] blady_blah@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Yes and no. That's a much harder thing to argue in reality. I'm an atheist so I'm pretty anti-religion, but the reality is that all parents want to teach their child at least some of their worldview. If that worldview includes religion, who are we to say "no, you can't teach that"? The child can always change their mind when they're older and in theory there's no harm. But a child can't decide to get their foreskin back. (I know there is a surgery to try to add some back, but it's just aesthetic, the nerves will never be recovered.)

[-] MrTolkinghoen@lemmy.zip 28 points 2 days ago

Male genital mutilation.

[-] Matombo@feddit.org 41 points 2 days ago

Until about a year ago or something I didn't even know that it's such a common practice in the USA. For me it always was just a religios thing of Jews and for some rare medical cases where the foreskin opening is too tight.

But now I know that it's apparently considerd normal? dafuq

Be assured it's defenetly not in germany unless you are jewish.

[-] Scrollone@feddit.it 24 points 2 days ago

...or Muslim. But yes, the US has this horrible practice of mutilating all kids. Just like some third-world countries.

[-] bluewing@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago

Nah, just the male children.

[-] ImADifferentBird 9 points 2 days ago

Yeah, it's said to have some kind of nebulous health benefits here.

It really goes back to the turn of the 20th century, when all kinds of health gurus claimed it would curb masturbation (which they blamed for a variety of ills), but nobody says that anymore.

[-] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Doing it as religious tradition isn't a justification as well, its still fuckin weird to mutilate a kids genitals without their consent

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago

Fortunately it's been in decline since the late 70s, but it still shouldn't be done

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sploosh@lemmy.world 64 points 2 days ago

There's a really easy way to tell whether or not you should decide to circumcise a penis. First, check if it's your penis. If it isn't your penis, don't circumcise it BECAUSE THAT IS NOT YOUR DICK AND YOU DO NOT GET TO DECIDE WHICH FLESH BELONGS AND WHICH DOESN'T ON IT.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Revan343@lemmy.ca 90 points 3 days ago

Stop mutilating your children.

Stupid fucking parents.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago

Maybe we should stop routine elective cosmetic penis surgery on infants?

[-] Aragaren@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago

Stop with the "cosmetic surgery" and call it what it is...genital mutilation!

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

It's both. Parents want their babies to have designer penises, so they pay doctors to mutilate them for aesthetic reasons. It is mutilation, and it is cosmetic surgery.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

It's not elective. They baby can't elect to having part of their genitals cut off.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

It's elective because there's no medical reason to do it. Babies don't get to choose anything for themselves. An adult can elect to have a circumcision, and parents can elect to have their babies circumcised. It would be a better world if the latter weren't true, but that ain't the kind of world we got.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 84 points 3 days ago

Why do they still perform such barbaric rites in the 21st century in the first place?

[-] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 3 days ago

I mean look who's sitting in the oval office. Science has progressed but most humans have not.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 179 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Stop ~~molesting~~ mutilating children would be my advice.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 136 points 3 days ago

Genital mutilation should be 100% illegal instead of only applying to girls.

[-] SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 3 days ago

I agree with you fully but there's a discrepancy that needs to addressed. Now, before you get the wrong idea, I'm NOT defending or excusing anybody here. The medical staff and the parents should be held responsible for nearly killing this newborn. Child genital mutilation of any kind should be banned.

Now, with that out the way, Male circumcision and female genital mutilation (or FGM, which is what I believe you're referring to when you say 'only applying to girls') are not directly comparable. Male circumcision typically only removes the foreskin of the penis whereas FGM removes the both the clitoris and labia (I shudder while typing this out). It would be like castrating the entire penis and testicles.

Again, this sort of thing should be banned and no child should suffer from the decisions they had no say in.

[-] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 2 days ago

It would be like castrating the entire penis and testicles.

That is very much not accurate. Genital mutilation (of both genders) generally focuses on removing the ability to obtain pleasure from sex while maintaining reproductive capability.

Circumcision is roughly analogous to clitoral hood amputation (one type of FGM). The foreskin also contains a substantial number of sensory nerves (Meissnar's corpuscles, and ~10k-20k nerve endings specialized for pleasure). Additionally, the glans (head) is subjected to the external environment in a manner which it was not adapted for, resulting in formation of thickened, layer of skin to protect it. These two things, taken together, result in greatly reduced sensory and pleasure capabilities in the penis. The reason for its commonality in the US is the historical puritanical belief that sexuality is wrong and desire to repress sexuality in little boys.

FGM is wrong. So is male genital mutilation. Inflicting either on those who can not consent is a crime against humanity that should not be accepted as commonplace.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

FGM removes the both the clitoris and labia

There is an entire horrifying spectrum of FGM, not just what you posted.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] moonlight@fedia.io 28 points 3 days ago

It would be like castrating the entire penis and testicles.

More like removing the glans and foreskin, but that doesn't make it much better. There are definitely varying degrees of awfulness, but it's all bad.

While there are some truly evil and horrific practices like removing the clitoris or sewing the vulva shut, some female genital mutation is "just" removing the clitoral hood, which is directly analagous to the foreskin.

Most people can agree that this practice is deeply wrong, and that it is still genital mutilation. And so I think categorizing male genital mutilation separately as "circumcision" is downplaying it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Landless2029@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago
[-] pulido@lemmings.world 77 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Why do parents keep choosing to cut up the genitals of their baby boys?

Is it because the dad had his penis cut up for him, and therefore he must do it to his son because "nothing is wrong with his dick"?

[-] makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world 50 points 3 days ago

In America at least most people don't really consider it until the kid is born. Then in the post birth rush of things happening someone asks if you want to circumcise your kid. Most Dads will say "well I'm circumcised, so I guess" and his dad said "well I'm circumcised, so I guess" and his dad said "well I'm circumcised, so I guess" and his dad said "HE IS BORN OF SIN! We must circumcise him to discourage sinful behavior!"

Most people really don't think too deeply about most things, try not to over think it

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 50 points 3 days ago

In parenting classes in my liberal area, the nurses will say "I'm required to tell you that circumcision has medical benefits". Then they fume how it's based off bad research and cut themselves short. "However it's not like your son will be lined up for a nude photo. You can break the cycle of trauma". I'm lucky to live here.

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

My partner gets mad when I point out that the same "medical benefits" can be said for FGM.

[-] JustOneMoreCat 4 points 2 days ago

Damn you have some good nurses. In my liberal area the best they did was mention that it's optional (literally some people think it's not). We also have liberal relatives who did it to their son just so he'd "look like dad." Wtf

[-] kittenzrulz123 55 points 3 days ago

As a Jewish person im absolutely ashamed that my people still practice mutilation. When a tradition causes severe medical problems it should not continue.

[-] Chozo@fedia.io 44 points 3 days ago

It's not even strictly a Jewish thing, as much as it is just an American thing at this point. My parents were only mildly Christian and got me circumcised at the recommendation of the doctor. They didn't really think much about it because being circumcised is just "the norm". My dad is circumcised, and my mom said she wanted to make sure I looked like my father (why she expected me to be catching so many glances of dad-dong in life, I'll never know).

That said, whether or not it should be, a circumcision is still a very routine procedure, so it's kinda astounding that they botched it so badly. Hopefully the kid makes it without any lasting damage.

[-] joel_feila@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Luckily is was almoat, it happens every year. It's rare but it possible to bleed to death from this

[-] MangoPenguin 18 points 2 days ago

Awful parents.

[-] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 44 points 3 days ago

It's ironic because the whole reason I'm even here on lemmy is because I was permabanned from reddit for telling someone to crawl back in their hole because they were defending circumcision while claiming female genital mutilation was abhorrent. As if mutilating a penis is perfectly fine but don't dare mutilate a vulva.

I know this isn't the main topic here but it just reminds me that body shaming men is okay but body shaming women isn't. Especially when it comes to sex organs.

load more comments (18 replies)

cut off usefull natural things without consent...win stupid prizes

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 54 points 3 days ago

But hey, on the plus side, they helped cure him of... I mean prevented... I mean...

What again?

[-] RejZoR@lemmy.ml 47 points 3 days ago

I'm sure someone will jump in and mention hygiene, like we haven't invented fucking soap some 3000 years ago...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2025
401 points (100.0% liked)

News

29096 readers
3988 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS