999
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] stembolts@programming.dev 142 points 5 days ago

USPS GOAT. Fuck privatización.

[-] TaiCrunch@sh.itjust.works 84 points 5 days ago

But sometimes I have mildly inconveniencing experiences with the postal service in my extremely rural town that require me to navigate my extremely rural town's nearly non-existent public services so we should absolutely surrender complete control to Amazon

[-] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 53 points 5 days ago

Private companies love the heartland and will work out of patriotism even if rural routes are less profitable! 🤡

[-] 1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world 35 points 5 days ago

We recently moved in a very rural area. The rural carrier for our new route gave us a form to fill out, and by the end of the week we were receiving mail. UPS and FedEX on the other hand, wouldn't deliver to us for a month. USPS will carry our packages up our driveway to our steps; UPS and FedEX throw them in the ditch by the mailbox.

Also, did you know you can buy stamps, cards, and envelopes directly from the rural carrier? Here's a fun quote from the rural customer registration form:

Rural carriers maintain a supply of stamps, cards, and envelopes for sale. Additionally, your carrier will accept Certified Mail™, Registered Mail™, insure packages, and prepare money orders. Generally, rural carriers can extend practically all services available at a Post Office. Please purchase a sufficient supply of stamps and affix proper postage on all outgoing mail.

Imagine how bleak things would be if Amazon was running the show. USPS is truly the best

[-] GroundedGator@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Imagine how bleak things would be if Amazon was running the show. USPS is truly the best

I'm sorry you are only subscribed to Amazon letter prime, in order to get your packages you must collect them from your nearest whole foods or upgrade to prime plus.

We're sorry prime plus is not available in your service area.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago

Milten Friedman is the reason we are where we are today.

[-] hperrin@lemmy.ca 158 points 5 days ago

Imagine shipping this tiny little box and it weighs 60 pounds. Poor mailman.

[-] P00ptart@lemmy.world 102 points 5 days ago

Last package of the da... Yo wtf?!?

[-] boonhet@lemm.ee 37 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

It's the 32 KG mop all over again

Note: Above video is marketing for an exercise plan, but it's also funny to watch occasionally when he has new episodes. As far as I know, the weights are real, but they're always loaded funny in the videos. Max plates visually for the weight the dudes are lifting

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

"I have to clean here!" - lifts fat barbell, that some steroid man just lifted with both hands, with one hand and moves it elsewhere.

[-] Delphia@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

Not to be a killjoy but your basic mailman has a pretty low weight limit on the parcels they take.

[-] neonred@lemmy.world 87 points 5 days ago

8 5/8" x 5 3/8" x 1 5/8"

Don't write yourself off yet, learn metric.

[-] Iron_Lynx@lemmy.world 34 points 5 days ago

For most of the rest of the world, that's about 219 mm × 137 mm × 41,3 mm

[-] Zron@lemmy.world 66 points 5 days ago

For those of us that don’t use arbitrary made up units at all, that’s 1.35515609E+34 Planck Length x 8.477460474E+33 Planck Length x 2.555613997E+33 Plank Length.

Use real measurements. A meter is how far light travels in 1/299,792,458 of a second? Statements made by the utterly deranged.

[-] Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago

Finally a truly universally usable measurement for everyday use

[-] L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 days ago

I'm sorry but... Length and Units? Actually disgusting. There is only ONE thing that exists, and it is inversely proportional the base rate of growth in half of a circular degree about a complex orthogonal dimension.

[-] SCmSTR 21 points 5 days ago

It's only in your head you feel left out or looked down on...

[-] Ediacarium@feddit.org 13 points 5 days ago

just try your best, try everything you can

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 days ago

moving from Europe to America the amount of times I'm like "it's 12 3/8ths" to try to, yknow, join in, and everyone's like "call it 12 or 13"

motherfucker that's a huge gap!

[-] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 90 points 5 days ago

Apparently neither of you are aware of how dense I am. ;)

[-] ComfortableRaspberry@feddit.org 27 points 5 days ago

But do you fit into that box? 🤔

[-] KMAMURI@lemmy.world 22 points 5 days ago

Nothing one of those fancy new blenders couldn't handle.

[-] Zabjam@lemm.ee 13 points 5 days ago

I have mixed feelings about this.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org 90 points 5 days ago

Wait until I fill that box with quark-gluon plasma.

[-] davidgro@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago

I'll go one better.
A (non-spinning uncharged) black hole with diameter 1+5/8th inches (so it fits in the box) has a mass of about 2.3 earths.

(Near as I can tell QGP filling the whole box is around a ten billionth of that.)

Of course the box would Very quickly no longer be outside the black hole. QGP would also cause the box to no longer be a container in short order. To put it mildly.

[-] BennyInc@feddit.org 22 points 5 days ago

It would also reach its destination very quickly. Or rather the other way around. Free delivery.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 83 points 5 days ago

at a typical temperature and pressure, sure.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 55 points 5 days ago

It’s because all the packages have the same domestic weight limit.

Seems silly, but makes sense in the context.

[-] Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Okay so I originally assumed this was probably due to some union rule or something like that. But I didn't find any reference to it in the NALC guidelines, anything in the USPS resources center (which is hard to use), anything in google searches, and the original employee documentation or spec.

I did find the USPS History section and it turns out they have someone whose job title is "Postal Historian", Stephen Kochersperger.

But, anyways, I found the address (not email of course haha) for the USPS history office so I have wrote up an letter and put it in the mailbox. I will eventually update yall

[-] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 7 points 5 days ago

This is the case for most "Dumb laws": there's an outlier that becomes kinda silly, but it's not really worth the effort to change.

I saw one "It's illegal to hunt Blue Whales in Idaho". Because it's illegal to hunt endangered species in Idaho, and Blue Whales are endangered, not because legislators were super concerned about saving Idaho's whale population.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TanteRegenbogen@feddit.org 37 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

He said "physically" which is wrong because Neutronium. What he possibly meant was "practically" in which Osmium would be the only element you can practically fit in the box since it isn't possible to synthesize neutronium at that amount or handle that much safely.

[-] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 37 points 5 days ago

If mailing 70 lbs of unstable particles that can't exist outside of a lab is wrong, I don't wanna be right.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] coffeejunky@beehaw.org 7 points 5 days ago

I always fill them up with that stuff black holes are made of, it's pretty dense.

[-] yozul@beehaw.org 3 points 4 days ago

I guarantee that it is physically impossible to fill a cardboard box with pure neutronium. Is it physically possible to get over 70 lbs of the stuff in there in a stable, shippable manner? I don't know, and neither do you. It's certainly far, FAR beyond the capability of any technology on Earth, but I guess it might maybe possibly not break the laws of physics. I can't prove that though, and neither can you, so neither of us can actually prove the statement wrong.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Hupf@feddit.org 8 points 4 days ago

At what velocity are the box's dimensions and effective mass determined?

[-] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 17 points 5 days ago

Neutronium... I am having early 2000s trivia website flashbacks! Wasn't a teaspoon of that stuff several tons or something?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 29 points 5 days ago

Could you create a device that would compress some substance to the extent it would reach this weight or is that impossible?

[-] lemmyng@lemmy.ca 51 points 5 days ago

Such devices exist, namely stars. Neutron stars are theorized to have neutronium at their core, essentially a soup of neutrons so densely packed that nothing else fits between them - in order words, the densest theoretical material (osmium is the densest material found on Earth).

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 16 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I guess I forgot to say it needs to fit in the package lol. I know it’s possible in extreme environments but can you create such an environment in this package is the question.

[-] P00ptart@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago

Just toss a few teaspoons of black hole in there.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] gibmiser@lemmy.world 34 points 5 days ago

I believe that would be some form of fusion

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Delta_V@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago

you can balloon the box out a ways to get more volume

[-] blandfordforever@lemm.ee 38 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The surface area of the box is about 135 inches. If this surface area were spread over a sphere, it would have a diameter of about 6.5 inches and a volume of nearly 150 cubic inches (nearly twice the volume of the uninflated box!). 150 cubic inches of osmium weighs about 120lbs.

So, indeed you could exceed the weight limit of the box by ballooning it out and filling it with something that's at least 7/12ths as dense as osmium (or a little more dense than lead).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] scytale@lemm.ee 20 points 5 days ago

What about a piece of neutron star in those dimensions? Would it still be lighter than 70 lbs?

[-] KickMeElmo@sopuli.xyz 60 points 5 days ago

Good news, after obtaining a piece of neutron star in those dimensions, you wouldn't need to worry about it anymore.

[-] sheepy@lemm.ee 18 points 5 days ago

The common popsci factoid tells us that a teaspoon of a neutron star weights as much as Mount Everest, so maybe.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
999 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

14397 readers
1904 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS