Let me curse in Church for a bit:

I like the AI image more. Why? Because this "flat and colorless" trend of Windows 8 going forward has been a fucking curse. Everything is flat and colorless now :(

I've read some comments here, and I can agree that the generated image is too complex, but the original design has gone too bland for my liking.

/cursing

Eh, I mean... Boo! AI Bad!

Ai did a shit job.

-Ex graphic designer

I would NOT support a business that has an AI generated image.

Did you seriously think the freelancer isn't capable of creating something like that? Like, do you think that FedEx uses their name with a hidden arrow in the "Ex" because they couldn't hire anyone to draw them a photorealistic delivery truck with a box on it or whatever? Microsoft can't figure out how to make a window with reflections so they use the squares?

The simplicity isn't an accident.

Considering they probably fed the left image into the ai to make the right image, it’s rather silly.

“I made this logo with only an ai model, and can-do attitude, and a logo.”

Especially since the magicsh*t ai version will be SO identifiable as a favicon

This is the modern-day equivalent of Frontpage/clipart

Lol try printing that on merch, dumb dumb. That’s an awful logo. It’s really not even a logo, it’s a scene.

"Guys I turned your Nike logo from a swoosh to wind blowing dust in a vague swoosh like shape also there's a foot there so you know where it came from and we'll stitch that on AAAAAAALLLL your products and guys... Guys? What do you mean I'm fired?"

anyone with a year of design training will know why the right "logo" is a pile of shit.

anyone with a month of experience printing will know why the right "logo" is a pile of shit.

anyone who has had 5 minutes with genAI will think they're a design master when they create the "logo" on the right.

MagicShot.ai - Al Logo Geneator

Geat work

Looks like they are missing the plot. Logos are supposed to be simple...

I work in an industry that deals with customer logos almost exclusively. I now get at least one person a week bringing in garbage-tier art they made in Canva or whatever that isn’t made to any standard at all, so they have tons of thin lines, gradients, blurring, etc. Shocker, AI only thinks about making it visually appealing when it won’t translate to a one-color, doesn’t have PMS tones to base it on, no simplified version, etc.

People think making a logo is just that. Just the image itself. They don’t think past what’s in front of them.

I've seen so many commercials where a realistic scene fades into the stylized logo that that's what my mind went to.

The left is a better logo, fewer fine details, easy to silk screen, easy to laser print, hell you could make a branding iron and burn it into wood.

Someone doesn't know what a logo is for, I see.

That logo is terrible.

Like, a core component of a good logo is that it’s easily identifiable at a glance at all shapes and sizes and on various backgrounds… complicated photorealistic logos basically lack all of these criteria by default.

This is why you need someone experienced not some ai slop.

The one on the right is prettier (not necessarily better. I've read some comments by people that know more than I do with some valid points). However, to create the image on the right, they probably fed the AI the image from the left, made by a designer.

I legit thought Lemmy just got ads when I saw this post

Imagine the printing costs of putting variations of the right on all your products? Just the color variety alone would add to the production costs.

Logo on the right is what you give a marketing team so they can tell you the 600 ways it won't print right, cost too much to display, and ultimately rework it into logo on the left.

AI generated art is the new "cousin who knows Photoshop".

This is fine, and mostly benign.