285
Shouldn't she be in a kitchen - according to her own views?
If she's anything like Phyllis Schlafly, why yes, the moment her husband tells her to get back in the kitchen she absolutely will! Right away! She'll drop everything, her privilege, her power, her perks. Her entire staff will be S.O.L. after just a word from her husband. If he just says the word, why, she wouldn't utter a word of protest. Honest!
I'm often reminded that while Jesus counselled his followers to turn the other cheek, he reviled the hypocrites.
This bitch is psychotic.
She did the same to someone who told her that if it wasn't for DEI/AA, she would have never been allowed to enter The Citadel in the first place. Not shitting on Mace's achievement, she made it, and graduated. But... did they let her because she was the first, as a PR stunt... ?
Mace lost her mind, ranted, and abused the person who mentioned it. But it still stands: if not for those social inclusion initiatives, she would have never been ALLOWED to step foot on the grounds in the first place.
What an absolute piece of shit. Speaking of Mace, of course.
She wasn't even the first admitted, just the first to graduate
Thanks for the correction.
You're welcome! I have a Citadel connection, so I know more about the school's history than I ever cared to learn.
Edit: If I remember correctly, The Citadel was the last military school to admit women. Way to go, South Carolina!
If you think that's bad, wait until you learn that Bob Jones University didn't allow black students until 1971, and didn't allow interracial dating between students until 2000.
Oh, I'm well aware of that despicable school in the Upstate. That whole area is still riddled with prejudice.
Yep, my mother's side of the family lived there.
I'm sure her daddy didn't intervene at all...
How dare you.
That was unpossible!
🙄
It's not DEI when it's nepotism 🧐
Unfortunately, true.
She is such a hateful bigot.
Getting real tired of The Unhinged Party
Certifiable.
When they shut down all the asylums 50 years ago, they decided to keep one last one open in DC
Is she seriously wearing those earrings?
It's a trashy move and no reasonable observer will think better of her for sharing it. Should play well with her base though.
Nancy Mace, Bobo, and MGT are all furious shadowboxers. They should do us a favor beat themselves in the face ala Fight Club.
Um, these shoes don't come in your size. Your feet are too big.
this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
285 points (100.0% liked)
politics
23206 readers
3172 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS