377
submitted 1 week ago by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] flandish@lemmy.world 90 points 1 week ago
[-] Nougat@fedia.io 27 points 1 week ago

It's the current fascion.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 81 points 1 week ago

I said it before and I will keep saying it. Any legitimate outlet would be boycotting the Whitehouse in solidarity with the AP till the AP is allowed back in. If you aren't allowed to push back against their lies and misinformation without fear of reprisals. Then what's the point of attending? You're just giving legitimacy to the propaganda. Walk away and let it devolve into an embarrassing circus of no names and bigots whom no one respects.

[-] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

I don’t think there are many legitimate outlets. The ones that are probably aren’t on their radar because they lack influence.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC Etc are still there I'm sure

[-] entwine413@lemm.ee 20 points 1 week ago

You said legitimate outlets.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Yes they like to pretend. But that's the point. They are all still there. And in my view if they ever were truly legitimate. Are clearly not at this point

[-] Fredthefishlord 12 points 1 week ago

That's a terrible idea. We need real news reporting on their going ons.

You're just giving legitimacy to the propaganda

No, it's reporting on what they're saying. And what they say matters, a lot. He's the president. It's not going to devolve into a circus it's going to devolve into genocide and we needs news every step of the way reporting on it.

Trump doesn't give a shit about a boycott. He'd be happy, even.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They can 100% report on the goings on without even being in there. All that's being aired in there are lies.

One of the core tools of fascism and propaganda is repetition. All of these Outlets just reporting what they say, fulfill this succinctly. Fuck what they say. It doesn't mean anything anyway.

And you are right about the fact that Trump won't care in the least. That is undeniably true. And not at all the point of such a boycott. Trump will happily fill it with ass kissers and yes men just like he has everything else. But when that's all that's there. It sort of becomes obvious what a joke it all is. When long time conservatives have to question who the hell cat turd is and what his credentials are to be in the White House Press pool. It will wake a few people up. A few that would never snapped out of it as long as CBS, NBC, ABC continue to let the Whitehouse use whatever reputation these outlets have left to pretend to have any legitimacy.

If you are simply reporting and ultimately repeating what a fascist says. You're part of the problem.

[-] Fredthefishlord 1 points 1 week ago

It doesn't mean anything anyway.

It often literally does

If you are simply reporting and ultimately repeating what a fascist says

It's not just repeating if you had detail onto it, of the issues and effects.

[-] aramis87@fedia.io 68 points 1 week ago

The administration was not only keeping the AP out of the press pool — the daily rotating group of reporters who get access to Trump in tight spaces that cannot accommodate the entire press corps — but removing the permanent “wire service” spot as well. That means there will no longer be a spot guaranteed for one of the wire services: the AP, Reuters and Bloomberg.

[-] boughtmysoul@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

So in other words, the closest thing we have to objective journalism. Weeeee!

Note that all of this is in direct violation of court orders. Just in case you thought the courts meant fucking anything anymore for the ruling regime. And it is a ruling regime at this point.

[-] Liljekonvalj@feddit.org 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Wasn't freedom of speech a huge deal with these guys?... Now its controlled speech?... How is this legal? How is this real?

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Surprise, it was freeze peaches the whole time just like every leftist ever scrawled about it.

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

The right likes to appropriate populist ideas to push through unpopular ones...

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

How is this legal?

Having a spot in the white house press pool is legally a privilege, not a right. The AP can still operate and write whatever they like, they're just not invited to exclusive press briefings.

This is a long-standing conflict of interest that incentivizes the press to field softball questions and avoid writing critical stories in hopes of getting priority treatment from the government, but typically it works in a more subtle way.

[-] figjam@midwest.social 2 points 1 week ago

So this unshackles the AP from bias in their reporting?

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I mean, I guess you could look at it that way, to an extent. But the larger effect is that it reinforces the threat against every other major news outlet, in a very blunt and overt way.

I don't expect the AP to suddenly radicalize over it or anything.

[-] libertyforever@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Nobody is stopping AP from reporting the news. What they did was completely legal. Not sure why WHCA thinks they have monopoly power. They don't.

[-] Liljekonvalj@feddit.org 9 points 1 week ago

What? I mean, how can a president choose what questions or choose only favorable news outlets? I understand that in America it's red against blue with the news, but this just doesn't make sense to me. Neither does the fact that he can choose like this. It's very strange to begin with.

[-] libertyforever@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Have you been looking at the press pool list? How can you argue those are all favorable news outlets?

[-] Liljekonvalj@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago

No I haven't. I read the article. But it's possible I misunderstood it.

[-] LemmyAddIt@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

You didn't misunderstand anything. They’re just yankin your chain

[-] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

SECRET DOUBLE BAN

[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

basically like SC2 sc2 where mengsk has his goons to suppress the reporters from his administration, and his famous qoute is similar to trumps.

this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
377 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23100 readers
2591 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS