Fuck /s.

I want a fuckable android.. Uhh I mean maid wife.

Even if it IS the future, it is not the present. Stop using it now.

This is my experience using it for electrical engineering and programming. It will give me 80% of the answer, and the remainder 20% is hidden errors. Turns out the best way to learn math from GPT is to ask it a question you know the answer (but not the process) to. Then, reverse engineer the process and determine what mistakes were made and why they impact the result.

Alternatively, just refer to existing materials in the textbook and online. Then you learn it right the first time.

Most don't have a problem with AI itself and even find it useful in its proper use cases

What most of us hate about it is the corporations shoving it every which way where it doesn't belong, doesn't work and down all our throats for profits so they can make line go up

It's pretty common to be pro-AI or at least neutral about it. Lemmy seems to have an echo chamber of hating it as far as I can tell, so maybe it's just new people coming in?

thing I don't like is on the rise

must be the tankies

It's useful. I ain't letting it write software. But I can let it write my stupid report and paperwork while feeding him the important bit. Because I really don't want to bother.

Kwebbelkop said on a Dutch tv channel that all the dutch speaking youtubers were insignificant compared to him. Now the only thing he produces is garbage and the Dutch youtubers still make authentic content.

Fuck kwebbelkop.

People are also always using one example to illustrate another, also known as a false injunction.

There is no rule that states all technology must be considered safe.

Those fools do not realize that creating the torment nexus is just the same as inventing the wheel!

I am very smart!

isn't that comic gas company propaganda, or am i rememberong it wrong

It's such a weird question. Why would I need ChatGPT to fuck my wife when we have the Dildoninator 9000 with Vac-u-loc attachments and King fu grip?

"I have no math talent, but that's ok I'll use a tool to help"

What tools do you need to replace "math talent"? If you're talking about calculators - first of all they're for arithmetic, not math - and second they still do not help you to "solve math problems". You need logic, experience and intellect to do that. The only "tool" thag can help you is an online forum if someone already solved it.

"I can't code so I'll use a web page maker to help"

You still need to do stuff, think with your brain and spend time to build the web page. You need to have taste and work your sweat (and some tears) into it.

"Hey AI, break this concept down for me to help me learn it"

No, not good unless you want to be misinformed and/or manipulated

society melts down because...?

Because the massive group of people were screwd over without their consent to make a tool that going to devalue their work. If you look closely on the examples you yourself provided, you can see that they all respect copyright of others and are themselves often a good and productive work. Ai on the other hand were made "at the expense" of us, and we are rightfully mad.

So basically there are now a couple studies that show critical thinking skills are on the decline due to AI use which is bad because. 1. Makes you easier to manipulate. 2. How do you check if the AI is Right?

Except that being good at math or being good at designing a web page have nothing to do with memorising formulas or coding. It's about being able to break down the problems into manageable pieces and applying your knowledge to bring structure to them. Which isn't something you can replicate with a tool, if you don't know how it's done in the first place.

If you know nothing about the general principles of math, you won't be able to solve problems even with tools, because you won't know which tools to use and how.

The thing people seem to forget in this argument is that art is more than making pretty pictures. Art is used to convey emotional messages -it's a unique act of human expression.

To create art (whether it be through image, writing, or something else) brings a cathartic sense to the artist, and if done well, it can communicate intended emotions to a viewer. Are there people carefully programming modern AI to make art that fits that concept? Maybe - I have heard people talk about that scenario, but I haven't seen any such art yet. Rather, the vast majority of modern AI images lack the nuance and emotional impact that real art carries. It's hollow, uncoordinated, and lacks the "soul" people connect to in human-made art.