671
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 99 points 1 month ago

EFF should GTFOutta US and set up shop in a safer region.

[-] NOPper@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 month ago

We need them here now more then ever unfortunately. But yeah, stay safe and spread out for sure.

They're the only thing I wear tee shirts for, have stickers all over my gear, and talk about way too often. Underappreciated champions of the people and nobody outside of these kinds of circles knows who the hell they are.

[-] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago

I was going to suggest Canada or Greenland...

[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 93 points 1 month ago

So I guess funds were cut, but then the courts ruled the president doesn't have authority to do this himself since the funds were allocated by congress, and so as of now they have been restored, although congress needs to approve them every year and there's concern they might not do so for next year.

[-] Midnitte@beehaw.org 33 points 1 month ago

Until Trump ignores court orders and cuts funding anyway.

Supreme Court will probably rule that while congress has the power of the purse, the president has the power of canceling the credit cards in the wallet, because fuck you that's why

[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago

Well, this is what the relevant part of the video says:

USAGM disbursed $7.5M to these entities, in "what seemed to be an effort to delay the hearing or woo the judge". Regardless, the latter has sided against USAGM, and just a few days ago, the agency has decided to back off and release the funds for the 2025 fiscal year.

[-] Paddy66@lemmy.ml 90 points 1 month ago

Urgh this is so backwards.

Governments need to fund more FOSS not less!

Hopefully the EU can increase its support to compensate.

[-] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 60 points 1 month ago

Foss is free, and this guy is all about making the American people pay more money to his rich buddies

[-] uriel238 5 points 1 month ago

He's doing a suck job of it. The things he's gutting are pennies towards his dark-souled oligarch masters. Cutting small government projects like the NEA, PBS or like FOSS grants is only used as an appeal to fiscal responsibility conservatives that aren't willing to cut into old-people benefits like Social Security and military sacred cows. Not because gutting tiny projects does anything useful, rather it gives the vibe that representatives are doing something.

This is an appeal to the imbicile MAGA though the tech bros might have specific FOSS projects that compete with their own commercial offerings. Not enough to cut all FOSS grants, though.

[-] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago

In essence he's trying to bankrupt the whole country so he and his circle can buy it all up. He's trying to do the same thing that was done in Russia when the ussr collapsed.

[-] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago

Or China! Open source is basically digital communism so maybe they'll step in and support it like they did with the World Health Organization

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

They are in order to get away from American products

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] gwilikers@lemmy.ml 86 points 1 month ago

Imagine trying to explain FOSS to this fucking administration.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 56 points 1 month ago

If it's free, then why are we paying for it?

[-] tanukikabuki@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago

I see what you did there... but freedom costs $1.05.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Aeri@lemmy.world 78 points 1 month ago

I didn't know that the government was funding these things to begin with, but I don't know many things.

[-] Isaac@waterloolemmy.ca 37 points 1 month ago

I also didn't know this, but really we should all be putting money behind FOSS (myself included). We don't need billionaires.

[-] RepleteLocum 33 points 1 month ago

Because foss projects like tor are regularly used by the agencies. It’s little money for a lot of work they don’t need to do.

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 9 points 1 month ago

Sounds like it may be time for some creative licensing

[-] SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

While it sucks that FOSS projects will have their funding sapped, let's remember why the open source model is used in the first place: it can't be bought. If it goes down, someone will just fork the last known repository and have it up and running again.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 month ago

Yep. All the funding they've already put into it will stay put. You can't uncode FOSS.

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 33 points 1 month ago

Lets encrypt could run a patreon and stay funded. Plenty of people with money depend on them.

[-] Zoop@beehaw.org 20 points 1 month ago

I really appreciate that there's a text version for those of us who can't or won't use videos! Thank you so much for sharing it, too. 💙

[-] misteloct@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If you use these services, please donate once or regularly if you're able. They are free as in puppy, not beer - dev work costs money. I would guess many people using Tor/privacy tools are tech savvy enough to have financial comfort due to a good career. If you do it you're doing an everyday act of rebellion for the sake of progress!!!

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago
[-] BoulevardBlvd 11 points 1 month ago

"free" when you find it on the side of the road, but expensive to actually maintain without having it die on you.

The download is free, but pay for it or it's going to die.

[-] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 month ago

Oh No ! Leopards Ate My Face.

Better off in the long run.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 78 points 1 month ago

This is not an example of leopards eating someone's face. Unless those projects threw their support behind Trump's admin, and I have no reason to believe they did, this is simply falling victim to fascist idiots.

[-] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 20 points 1 month ago

Valid point.

[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 37 points 1 month ago

Uhh.. these projects are the backbone of the free and modern web. How is less funding a good thing?

Not the one you answered to, but I think I can understand the idea of US funding having been a toxic source of dependency, and it being better in the long run to get money elsewhere. That "elsewhere" is a good question, though.

Just me, personally, my dream would be an international fund, carried by the UN or maybe an independent NGO, that can get funding from both private and public funds, that prioritises free internet access the way the WHO prioritises health. But I think that's still far off.

[-] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago

US funding having been a toxic source of dependency, and it being better in the long run to get money elsewhere.

Yup, pretty much my intent, that and the insecurity it engenders, rather surprised by the reaction.

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

the reaction makes sense; these organizations are modeled after for-profit corporations since that's where most of its leaders come from and oriented towards simpler modes of funding like the american gov't; this is effectively a disaster for this sort of posture and it's hard from them to imagine any other form.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 8 points 1 month ago

Not sure if this is meant here, but shockingly many people believe that "funding" something equals to "controlling" it.

[-] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 month ago

many people believe that “funding” something equals to “controlling” it.

Pretty much the definition of soft power, which an awful lot of politicians believe in.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 month ago

Not a good thing, just an inevitable one, as they conflict with the interests of the US (oligarchs and techbros).

[-] chebra@mstdn.io 17 points 1 month ago

@MalReynolds Are you saying F-Droid, TOR, Tails or Let's Encrypt supported Trump? I'd like to read more about that.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] abbiistabbii 6 points 1 month ago

Oh course not. They stop people spying on you.

[-] Cattail@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

we shouldn't need the government also we have made it fairly far

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2025
671 points (100.0% liked)

Open Source

36802 readers
42 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS