Who needs shape tool when we have text tool
really looks like more of a squircle
OoOOoO
I dont get it
It's a basic GIMP knowledge, really. Don't forget to add an alpha channel to your layer after step 2, otherwise it won't work.
Why would you do this when the functionality is built right in?
Don't forget to draw the rest of the owl, too!
Uhhh you can't put image generarion prompts to it. Its a photo editor!
how i'd do it:
If you want a circle outline, you can draw 2 circles, one smaller and the color of the background
indeed, i could
outstanding move
some more unicode basic shapes for everyone
○ △ □ ▭ ◇ ☆
Thank you for the new gimp toolbar
Welll first you draw this head...
It's easy if you use the right tool.
does GIMP not have a circle/shape tool? Why?
It does! And it's so easy to use.
It's so obvious I can't imagine why anyone would be confused.
Draw a circle with the ellipse selection tool
So it does have what is effectively a circle shape tool. I don't know why people are saying it doesn't.
I was being sarcastic because really it doesn't have a tool with explicit features, just a workaround using a couple features together.
For a new user it's very difficult to do a pretty basic task.
That's not actual shape tool.
Shape created by shape tools should be always editable. Using ellipse selection tool means the circle is rasterized.
nope, and nobody knows why
The development of 3.0 was focused on GEGL and non-destructive editing. Working on the shape tool in parallel would've taken away resources and pushed back the release date even further.
Why can a shape tool not be pixel based? There's no intrinsic requirement for vectors.
Because a shape tool requires non-destructive vector layers.
No it doesn't, why not a bitmap shape tool?
Why would it? It's a photo editing tool, not a drawing tool.
Yep. It's not Inkscape.
Do PhotoShop and Illustrator both do full vector editing? I never paid to find out.
Photoshop can't draw capsicums so GIMP is still better.
Yep. It's not Krita.
Yep. It's not FireAlpaca.
now this is truly terrible knowledge.
I just made one, just need to merge those three layers and I'll be done...
There are so many weird things about GIMP, and it feels like they add more over time. I've moved a layer and then tried to draw on it and had nothing happen. Why? Because the layer was created as an array of pixels the size of the image, and when I move it there's now a dead zone where there's no pixels in the visible image. It turns out there's a special command to expand moved layers to fill the image: https://docs.gimp.org/3.0/en/gimp-layer-resize-to-image.html
There are times using it that it feels like a maze to navigate to just get my changes reflected in the document.
Your circle is a bit off....
...its like wonky on the corners for some reason.
Of course its an o.....
Good enough circle yay
Please make a 45 minute tutorial video to share that knowledge 🙏
Sure. First 10 minutes will be intro ans last 10mins will be telling to like, share and sabaracribe
This thread has made it clear to me that I should wait another year before checking on gimp again.
Set a large pencil brush size and click a large black dot. Then make the brush smaller and white, then click once in the middle.
you motherfucker
You can also use the brush tool and just draw a circle that's completely filled in at whatever size you want and then remove the inner portion that you don't want by switching to the erase tool and then shrinking the size of the circle brush to what you don't need and clicking directly in the center of the circle.
edit -> stroke selection
Hint: :q!
Sister communities:
Community rules (click to expand)
1. Follow the site-wide rules
sudo in Windows.Please report posts and comments that break these rules!
Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.