329
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world

Who needs shape tool when we have text tool

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] callyral@pawb.social 25 points 1 week ago

does GIMP not have a circle/shape tool? Why?

[-] neclimdul@lemmy.world 32 points 6 days ago

It does! And it's so easy to use.

  • Draw a circle with the ellipse selection tool
  • From the edit menu choose "stroke selection" and follow the dialogs
  • Remove your selection

It's so obvious I can't imagine why anyone would be confused.

[-] callyral@pawb.social 12 points 6 days ago

Draw a circle with the ellipse selection tool

So it does have what is effectively a circle shape tool. I don't know why people are saying it doesn't.

[-] neclimdul@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago

I was being sarcastic because really it doesn't have a tool with explicit features, just a workaround using a couple features together.

For a new user it's very difficult to do a pretty basic task.

[-] nasi_goreng@lemmy.zip 10 points 6 days ago

That's not actual shape tool.

Shape created by shape tools should be always editable. Using ellipse selection tool means the circle is rasterized.

[-] renzev@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Paths in Gimp are persistent, non-rasterized, and editable. Just make a circle with the ellipse tool and then convert it to a path.

[-] nasi_goreng@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

That's still not as intuitive as actual shape tools on any other software.

If average casual user get confused to it, then it's a bad UX.

[-] renzev@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Trying to cater to some mythical "average casual user" and avoiding some vague concept of "bad UX" at all cost is how you get unusable garbage like Gnome and Teams.

[-] nasi_goreng@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago

I'm not saying it has to be GNOME or Teams. Gnome is too limiting (I also don't like it), while Teams is... whatever.

It's just have to be great for advance user, while easy to user for first-time user.

Let me give you some example of bad UX, that fixed in other software:

  • Gradient effect is not editable once you deselect it, you have to recreate it from scratch (you can edit it on Photoshop or Affinity Photo)
  • There's should be option to adjust font size with resizing text box instead of trying to input every single number (it's possible on every major software)
  • Drawing outside the layer does not retain its information (CSP retains the information)
  • NDE effects cannot be drag and drop between layer for faster editing
  • Rotating text cannot be edited (just saw the dev talk about it on Discord)

Almost all of the UX problems here are recognized by the dev, even actively discussed on how to fix them!

You can make advance application while still catering towards newbies! For example: Clip Studio Paint. They have multiple layout and UI for different use case and audience.

[-] Abnorc@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago

mythical "average casual user"

Mythical? You realize people like this exist, right? This is why programs like this exist. Take Audacity for example, it was made with non-professional audio people in mind. Just people who have odds and ends to do with audio. It's simple enough that someone with no prior knowledge can start poking around and figuring things out, and it's advanced enough that it can get the job done for most people who need to work with audio files.

I'm not saying that GIMP needs to prioritize the first time user experience. If making the UI/UX more approachable for new users would necessarily make it worse for established users, then it may be a decent tradeoff. Denying the existence of people who just need to edit an image here and there is absurd though.

[-] festnt@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago
[-] rtxn@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago
  1. Because it's a photo editing tool, not a painter. Different priorities.
  2. Because a shape tool requires non-destructive vector layers.
  3. ...and implementing that would require a fundamental overhaul of the current vector backend from 2006.

The development of 3.0 was focused on GEGL and non-destructive editing. Working on the shape tool in parallel would've taken away resources and pushed back the release date even further.

[-] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 6 days ago

Why can a shape tool not be pixel based? There's no intrinsic requirement for vectors.

[-] callyral@pawb.social 12 points 6 days ago

Because a shape tool requires non-destructive vector layers.

No it doesn't, why not a bitmap shape tool?

[-] AugustWest@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

Why would it? It's a photo editing tool, not a drawing tool.

[-] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Yep. It's not Inkscape.

Do PhotoShop and Illustrator both do full vector editing? I never paid to find out.

Photoshop can't draw capsicums so GIMP is still better.

this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
329 points (100.0% liked)

linuxmemes

24143 readers
1233 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Language/ัะทั‹ะบ/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  • 6. (NEW!) Regarding public figuresWe all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.
  • Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
  • We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
  • Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
  • ย 

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS