266

Incredible to think about that we got it right the first time (with email) and still had to spend the last 20 years complaining about centralized social networks.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 75 points 1 month ago

That is why it's important to also use other software than Lemmy like Mbin or Piefed. Users want choice and the Fediverse is only as decentralized as the software running on it. So please, think about this.

[-] notanapple@lemm.ee 38 points 1 month ago

I dont think its the software* but the instance that matters. Everyone being on lw is not good (not that there is anything wrong with lw, just that centralization is bad). Thankfully most lemmy apps nowadays default to lemm.ee which should hopefully counter most of the centralization. Lemmy apps should rotate the default server when it gets too big which will help a lot (also shows the impact defaults have).

*Software would have mattered if the main devs instance was also the biggest. Or a very popular lemmy client defaulted to their own instance. With lemmy thats not the case.

[-] sabzian@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago

Great point. If defaults didn’t matter Google wouldn’t have spent billions of dollars buying the default search position on other browsers.

[-] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 12 points 4 weeks ago

I do not agree with you. Yes I'm a developer myself of Mbin. And I created Mbin. However, the problem with decentralization is that you still need to trust the developers who are building the decentralized apps. So within a decentralized ecosystem the centralized point are the developers and its project.

If you do not agree with Lemmy, you can go to Mbin. And visa versa; if you do not agree with Mbin devs, you can go to Lemmy, etc. Meaning you do need to have alternatives, otherwise choice is an illusion and decentralization is also an illusion.

~ Melroy, Mbin developer.

[-] Irelephant@lemm.ee 3 points 4 weeks ago

Big fan of mbin,

I'm sure this has been asked before, but do you plan on adding support for lemmy's api? Lemmy really has the edge in apps.

[-] humiddragonslayer@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago

I think a surefire way to help with this would be to have a rule that any instance that becomes the largest one on Lemmy should lock itself instantly. That way, we'll only surpass the current max number of users on a single instance until it's completely spread out

[-] JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

This sounds neat, I kinda like this

[-] Ziglin@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

I would suggest giving it a smallish margin so that it wouldn't get annoying with two similarly sized instances.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Also, have a look at https://lemmyverse.net/communities?order=active and count the number of non-LW communities in the top 20

Ironically, !fediverse@lemmy.zip could also be an alternative to this community.

@coffeeadmin@lemmy.coffee , have you considered crossposting there?

[-] notanapple@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago

I think piefeds combined view makes this less of an issue. Like people subscribe to/post in the big communities because they are more active so get more comments and stuff. But in piefed you get the combined discussion from all the communities so you get the same experience even if you are subscribed to a less popular community on that topic.

[-] mesamunefire@piefed.social 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Feeds are awesome 😎

Ex: https://piefed.social/f/fediversevideos

Allows you to sub to many fediverse account/communities/etc...

[-] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

Piefed feeds do not solve technical delay between LW and aussie.zone

https://lemm.ee/post/59055817

[-] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Piefed feeds do not solve technical delay between LW and aussie.zone

https://lemm.ee/post/59055817

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 50 points 1 month ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

I really do want to point out, Gmail is gonna get a massive lead as time goes on.
Doing parental consent forms for my schools library, most of the parents email were yahoo, Hotmail, etc. but EVERY SINGLE student email was Gmail, with the exception of like 10 out of (at least) 300 pages

(edit: to clarify, 300 pages is 300 emails)

[-] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

There really is no competitor to Google Drive’s online collaborative document and slideshow editing right now. Apple and Microsoft have made some weak attempts but until their software works fully in a browser and is 100% free to get started, it won’t catch on. It not just about email.

[-] Irelephant@lemm.ee 5 points 4 weeks ago

mega is good, in my experience.

[-] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 weeks ago

I meant the productivity suite not just file sharing. I edited my comment to try to make it clearer.

[-] macaw_dean_settle@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago

That's because these students were brain washed on that garbage.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 28 points 1 month ago

This is a terrible distribution and the semi-centralisation and gatekeeping by the established actors is one of the reason email is dying.

I think we can do much better than that 👍

[-] grue@lemmy.world 48 points 1 month ago

Email has been "dying" for 20+ years. I'll believe it when I see it.

[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 23 points 1 month ago

yeah its hard for an essential service to die. I will spout one of my super downvoted opinions but I think every government should be providing email service the same way they provide physical mail service. With all the rights currently given to physical mail. Im not saying as the only option and im being idealistic in thinking we can do like what we did with physical mail in this modern time. But I don't care. Its essential and there should be a version people have that is a right and cannot go away.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago

I'm not sure why the USPS shouldn't be the sole provider of email in the US.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

Why in the world should it be?

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago

No profit motive and no private interests.

I'm sure there could still be private carriers, just like there's still private delivery services like UPS and FedEx, but I don't see why the average person should be relying on a private company for essential infrastructure.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

You really trust the US government to control your communications? Especially given the last 20 years?

There exist plenty of free email platforms right now. I'm not against the government providing one, but unlike physical packages, sending an email to Bumfuck, Missouri doesn't cost any more than sending it across town.

There's the cost of the ISP, and for that I think there should be a municipal option for sure, to provide service to unprofitable regions just like postal mail and rural electrification.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago

There's a reason they're trying to destroy and privatize USPS. It's highly unionized and the workers won't let them use USPS against us.

Also, while we're at it, USPS should also provide municipal internet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 weeks ago

You really trust the US government to control your communications? Especially given the last 20 years?

No, I don't trust right-wing Nazis to control my communications. And I sure as fuck trust the government more than I trust greedy corporations. The problem is that the corporations have been fucking up the capitalistic/democratic balance for the last 50 years.

[-] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think every government should be providing email service the same way they provide physical mail service. With all the rights currently given to physical mail.

We've tried that in Germany. The De-Mail was already dead when it was born.

[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 6 points 1 month ago

I mean it should not be. It should be run if no one is using it but government communication should always be through it so you know its legit. I'd be fine if it was not popular. I mean if everyone sent everything through ups and fedex I would still want usps to be a thing here.

[-] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 4 points 4 weeks ago

I think every government should be providing email service the same way they provide physical mail service

The problem with that is that email is not really secure enough for sensitive stuff like your bank account statements or your health/medicine journals from your doctor.

That is why in Denmark we don't have the government provide actual email, but there is rather a digital mailing system where you authenticate with your digital ID and can receive secured mail from banks, municipalities, health authorities, tax authorities and others.

[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 4 weeks ago

I mean I want this as part of the system. I actually want my bank statement sent via email without sensitive information in it. I mean I really. really. wish we had what you do but im not keen on digital documentation being an email that says log onto the site. Its like getting a postcard that says hoof it over to the office. Since email is no less secure than snail mail I see no issue with statements going out by email if its just not going to be done properly. I mean I give my accounts nicknames. I don't need the account numbers on the statements or anything else crazy like my ssn.

[-] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 4 points 4 weeks ago

Since email is no less secure than snail mail

I would disagree with that. The attack surface on snail mail is much, much smaller (only whoever can get in physical contact with my mail) and any attack scales incredibly badly. It is also often hard to read snail mail without making it obvious that it has been tampered with (i.e. opening the envelope).

Meanwhile the attack surface of email is huge (basically the entire internet), any attack can scale wildly and it is impossible to tell if anyone else read an email.

By and large, physical stuff is much more secure than digital stuff, just less convenient.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

We should have large semi-centralized services. But they should be democratically controlled.

Do you ever think about why cities form? Rural life has a lot of appealing characteristics, plus it's the starting state of the world. Cities form because there is an advantage to size, proximity and specialization. If we had a new planet and completely evenly distributed the population across its land, we'd very quickly form cities regardless.

It's the same with centralized services. It takes a lot of special knowledge and equipment to run an email service. The average Lemmy user may have those resources, but even here, how many of us run our own email servers?

It costs less per person in resources to add more users after the first one. So there's an incentive to aggregate users together. And once you have a certain number of users, maybe you figure out some way to fund your operation, and you can pay more people to add features/capabilities. Soon your entity not only has more users, it's more appealing than a plan vanilla email service, and you get even more users. You're doing it cheaper and better than the DIYers.

I think centralization and size are naturally occurring. We should think about ways to exist and benefit from them, so something like Gmail but run as a worker cooperative.

[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

As someone who runs a Lemmy server I can tell you that it isn't as simple as that.

Yes, there is an initial benefit from having more users on an instance, but this initial scaling benefit isn't linear. It rather abruptly stops at a few thousand users and after that it becomes much harder and more expensive to scale further. Only after going over that hump it might become cheaper again at the scale of hundred-thousand of users or so, but Lemmy the software is currently also unlikely to scale as a single instance to such numbers, so it isn't just a system operator question.

So no, unless you want to fully commercialize the Fediverse and bring in external investors to fund the getting over that initial hump, semi-centralisation is not a feasible way forward. And what would even be the point of that? Reddit exists and is basically the same.

Luckily ActivityPub is designed to scale horizontially through lots of smaller (but not tiny) instances, so I think we can manage without the above.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Michal@programming.dev 12 points 4 weeks ago

The thing about email is that the software is proprietary. Each of these providers has their own implementation of the interface, features, and integration with their tools (Google drive, photos, etc).

As long as lemmy servers run lemmy software, this won't happen, or at least won't be an issue as you can move to another server and not have to change your usage habits.

However if some server owners decide to fork Lemmy and develop their proprietary server, overhaul the UI, add features and attract users, it will start to become a problem.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 8 points 4 weeks ago

Email had standardized protocols and clients for 50 years, and still does.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Obelix@feddit.org 4 points 4 weeks ago

email is a standard protocol. You can run your own server using FOSS software in 5 minutes if you start now. One of the biggest problems is that you will have a hard time "federating" to gmail and others due to the spam problematic, but that is something that we will see with Lemmy, too. Currently I can spin up my own server and start pushing shit to lemmy.world and other bigger instances, but I feel that this will change with the coming spam waves

[-] Irelephant@lemm.ee 3 points 4 weeks ago

Lemmy uses activityPub, and open protocol for social networking.

Piefed and mbin are both open source, and interoperate with lemmy.

[-] HappyFrog 11 points 1 month ago

It'll probably follow Zipf's law, like most things.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

Okay, based on that article Zipf's law seems to mostly apply to languages. Cities, for example, don't follow it.

[-] HappyFrog 2 points 1 month ago

It shows up when choosing things. Most people will choose the largest, some will choose the next largest, etc. I might be wrong, of course.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Irelephant@lemm.ee 8 points 4 weeks ago

Lemmy.world, lemm.ee.

[-] not_IO 6 points 4 weeks ago

federation and the concept of communities have always been a little awkward together since it's based on sunreddits where there is only one always.

The only ways this pans out is with having one server where the community is most successful to eat up the others or having like two or three who hate each other

[-] Gladaed@feddit.org 6 points 1 month ago

For fucks sake, have the 0 at the twelve o clock position and not this horrible mess. This ruins one's day.

[-] Albbi@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago

By how easily you're offended, your day was probably going to be ruined anyway.

I kinda like it. The off-centered main line allows labels to be written easier.

[-] Kualdir@europe.pub 4 points 1 month ago

It really just depends on how users have to choose a service and how much it matters. With email the service used doesn't really matter so most either use what is given to them (here that's often from their ISP) or what is recomended to them (e.g. Gmail or Hotmail here in the EU)

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
266 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

32924 readers
519 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS