168
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 4 days ago

Ok that's enough social media for today. Sigh

[-] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 131 points 1 week ago

We still have three years to go before the next election, assuming one actually happens.

At this stage in the game, the only thing that these types of polls are going to reveal is who has the most name recognition.

In other words, everyone calm down.

[-] CarnivorousCouch@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago

Thank you! Any time this kind of polling shows up on Lemmy, users seem to think this is the Plan of the Democratic Leadership Cabal, rather than an incredibly premature name recognition test.

People want to vote for people they have favorable impressions of who they also think others will vote for. Without other frontrunners, who emerge over time, it's not surprising that polled Democrats would recognize and still support the candidate that 75 million people voted for five months ago.

If you want other candidates (I do), identify them and figure out how to help them build their profile now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 115 points 1 week ago

Are you fucking kidding me.

AOC and Bernie over here amassing entire legions of working class people and they're over here bashing themselves in the nuts. doing a straw poll with corporate doners pretending like it means fucking ANYTHING.

GODAMNIT THESE FUCKING DEMOCRATS ARE FUCKING MORONS.

[-] OminousOrange@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago

Perhaps time for a third party...

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 111 points 1 week ago

fucking morons.

people demanding progressives, but no, lets pretend conservative democrats have a fucking chance.

how tone-deaf can you fucking be.

[-] oxysis@lemm.ee 50 points 1 week ago

Considering the Democratic Party has done this 3 times in a row and that they refuse to primary wildly unpopular members of their own party.

They are extremely tone deaf and out of touch with what the voters want. It’s why I want the progressives in the party to split off. The progressives are screwed if they stay, so why not leave and have an actual fucking chance?

Bernie Sanders got screwed over by the super delegates who all went for unpopular Hillary Clinton. Imagine how wildly different things would be if he was the Democratic nominee in 2016?

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 22 points 1 week ago

agreed. we have assholes like obama and bill clinton also to blame for sinking bernie in 2016.

they are 100% part of why trump is president right now.

[-] baronvonj@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Considering the Democratic Party has done this 3 times in a row and that they refuse to primary wildly unpopular members of their own party.

The primaries are open to anybody who meets the requirements. We don't have to wait for "the party" to provide us with better candidates. The better candidates just have to follow the process to declare themselves a candidate. And then we just have to show up and vote for them.

Bernie Sanders got screwed over by the super delegates who all went for unpopular Hillary Clinton.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superdelegate#2016_election

Sanders initially said that the candidate with the majority of pledged delegates should be the nominee; in May 2016, after falling behind in the elected delegate count, he shifted, pushed for a contested convention and arguing that, "The responsibility that superdelegates have is to decide what is best for this country and what is best for the Democratic Party."[46][54] Ultimately, Clinton won the nomination without relying on the votes of superdelegates; she led Sanders by a substantial number of elected delegates (from primary and caucus votes), as well by a substantial margin in the popular vote.

Also at the top of that page:

In 2018, the Democratic National Committee reduced the influence of superdelegates by barring them from voting on the first ballot at the Democratic National Convention, allowing them to vote only in a contested convention.

Imagine how wildly different things would be if he was the Democratic nominee in 2016?

It's sad to think about how much better things could have been, and also if we had had Gore in 2000. But we shouldn't forget that Clinton won the primaries popular vote by enough that the superdelegates' votes didn't matter.

[-] waddle_dee@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

I still feel like Harris had to gave been handicapped on progressive policies from the DNC. There's simply no way, with her record and history, that she wouldn't have campaigned on a completely separate platform than Biden unless he, and the DNC forbid it. Now, that brings about a new set of issues; in which she was unable to stand up to the establishment and say, fuck you guys. She used to be pretty progressive in the senate and it all went away with the VP.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Redditsux@lemmy.world 79 points 1 week ago

Good god please no. Not again.

[-] something_random_tho@lemmy.world 61 points 1 week ago

Dems right now.

Goofy meme I’ll fucking do it again

[-] zenpocalypse@lemm.ee 58 points 1 week ago

I like Harris just fine and she would have been a far better president than Donnie, but this is how JD Vance becomes President.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Cant we find someone who is not in favor of war crimes to run from the left? How about Buttigieg

[-] zenpocalypse@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago

I'd be all in on that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 51 points 1 week ago

Jfc. They'll never learn. We really are all doomed.

Just kidding. We were doomed already.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 41 points 1 week ago

So, they prove once again that they don't learn.

[-] Wilco@lemm.ee 38 points 1 week ago

No we fucking didn't. She can't win a primary against sanders.

[-] raynethackery@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Bernie Sanders is 83. He won't be running in the Presidential primaries.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago

Honestly I don't think she should run in 28. Nothing against Kamala, but we really don't need a moderate centrist insider to bring us back from the damage Trump is doing. The nation would be far better off having a real debate with Pete, Tim, and Alexandria up on stage. Kamala would have too much power over the process, and would use every bit of it. Which of course means that's exactly what's going to happen, probably handing us a narrow loss to fucking Don Jr. or some other moron puppet.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] exploitedamerican@lemm.ee 31 points 1 week ago

Mmore proof the neo liberal democratic party is a controlled opposition party who bows to the will of the same Wall Street military and prison industry profiteers that guide the policies of the right. Trump is going to be handed another 4 years after they repeal the 22nd amendment. this country is a fascist hellscape

[-] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago

Why? Jfc just learn for once.

[-] themadcodger@kbin.earth 16 points 1 week ago
[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's funny how libs think republicans are the only stupid "party".

[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

You got that backward. Republicans have stupid constituents, and the democrats have a stupid party. Republicans have been playing the long game and reaping the rewards of decades worth of planning and posturing. Democrats can't agree on a vision. The democrats strength is also their biggest problem. They're a big tent party that's inclusive to all and all ideas. In practice, that means they lack a single vision to fight for and never long-term plan. If they quit focusing on the fringe and instead focused on the class war, they could have that singular, uniting vision.

[-] Mr_Canard@jlai.lu 26 points 1 week ago

Never get tired of losing

[-] Hotspur@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 week ago

A.) this is a joke right? B.) amusing they think there’s gonna be a viable election in 2028

[-] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 week ago

Here's an idea, maybe field a compelling candidate who can beat Trump?

Crazy I know. I just don't know where it comes from sometimes.

[-] Cyclist@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

If Trump is allowed to run again so is Obama. Not sure how everyone feels about that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ProfHillbilly@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

What the actual fuck. They never learn.

[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 week ago

Can't wait until she loses again to the same dipshit moron she lost to and we're blamed again for her horrid policy campaign, again.

[-] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

What the fuckkkkk

[-] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

I swear to god if they pull this nonsense again…

[-] TheDeadlySquid@lemm.ee 23 points 1 week ago

Please don’t.

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

Democrats love fucking losing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] missingno@fedia.io 22 points 1 week ago

Things the DNC has learned:

[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 11 points 1 week ago

Was this a poll of the DNC or registered Democrats? Asking because ad blocker.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] demizerone@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

This is why repubs don't have to cheat to win. Democrats will it into existence.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago
[-] halferect@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

no just no no no please god no

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

She needs to fuck off. Permanently.

[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 week ago

I'm sure leftists and 3rd party voters will be blamed again when she loses, again.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Surely they must mean "Favorite candidate to run away from"....

(I'm kidding, though. I liked Harris as a candidate, but not having a real primary did the Democrats no favors. I blame Biden for not dealing realistically with his aging more than Harris.)

[-] AarynBlack@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago

We need an actual third party.

load more comments (4 replies)

Goddammitsomuch

[-] ofcourse@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago

The Democratic Party’s sole strategy looks like maximizing their big donor and independent votes. So they keep moving toward center-right.

  1. That strategy has failed 2/3 last times so may be try changing it Sherlock.
  2. The big donors don’t care about anything besides their own personal gain. The only difference is that “Democratic” big donors also pretend they care about the people. May be get on the ground and talk to your constituents instead.
  3. Even if you get the independent votes, your main base is completely alienated and does not trust you. So all you will get are the independent votes losing you the election.

This Democratic Party is like the monsters in Scooby Doo - the villain wearing the mask of the common person so they can get closer to you before stabbing in the back.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] watson387@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 week ago

To be honest, if there's still an election in 2028 and Kamala Harris is the democrat candidate, I just won't vote anymore. I've voted regularly since I turned 18, but I can't vote Republican in good conscience and Democrats have abandoned the public. I don't even dislike Kamala Harris, she just has no chance of winning and the DNC seems incapable of learning from their mistakes.

[-] _lilith@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Fuck off loser

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
168 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22535 readers
3336 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS