1051
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Corigan@lemm.ee 167 points 2 months ago

“The word ‘philanthropy’ is often interpreted as someone who gives money,” he told the alumni magazine.

“But the Greek roots of the word ‘philos’ and ‘anthropos’ mean to love humans. What I have discovered is spending money is the easy thing, spending yourself is the hard thing. The 12 Neighbours project is how I can best spend myself.”yl

I'm not crying, you're crying... Sniff

[-] Snowcano@startrek.website 95 points 2 months ago

I also liked this:

“We have people who have been run over by trauma, by substance abuse, by all of these things,” LeBrun told Macleans. “It’s about excavating that person, buried under their circumstances, little by little.”

Seems like a decent dude.

[-] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 49 points 2 months ago

I like this part as well:

“I won the parent lottery, the education lottery, the country lottery,” LeBrun told Macleans. “It would be arrogant to say every piece of my ‘success’ was earned, when so much of it was received.”

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works 123 points 2 months ago

This is fine, but millionaires won't save us

[-] mutual_ayed@sh.itjust.works 142 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

This could be pointed to as a successful test case to get the gov off it's ass and implement this at a macro level.

You are correct millionaires will not save us, however we should reward behavior we want to see. Lest we get more billionaires who are a net drag on society.

[-] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 months ago

Sure, but let's pretend this one hasn't done significantly more than others.

[-] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 20 points 2 months ago

Absolutely, but it is food seeing some people who actually use their money for something good.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 84 points 2 months ago

Elon Musk would never lol. He could do so much good with his money but he just chooses not to. Has he built a library? A park? A school? Literally anything?

[-] Corigan@lemm.ee 63 points 2 months ago

Didn't you know empathy is a sin and weakness.....

Can't believe he said that shit.

[-] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 months ago

Something something he could've ended world hunger, but chose not to.

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 13 points 2 months ago

He twisted and parroted the words of someone else. Fucker's absolutely incapable of original thought or actual creation

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 60 points 2 months ago

Very smart to put solar panels on each unit. I hope the residents will be allowed to plant some flowers, bushes, and trees to brighten up the area.

This is in my town. They are allowed and encouraged to do so. Their place is THEIR place, it fosters a sense of community and ownership of the community.

This project really kicks ass and it's making waves. I know the guy is a millionaire, but I've listened to a few interviews and his heart is at the right place. He genuinely cares and is being pragmatic about it.

I wish I could say the same for the billionaires of this province. Looking at you, Irving shitbags.

[-] deeferg@lemmy.world 31 points 2 months ago

It's actually not as crazy being a tech millionaire nowadays since so many people build a great service and then just have it bought up by the competition.

It said right in the article Salesforce bought his product in 2011 and thats what made him a millionaire. Pretty good way to use that life changing money for the better of others and not just himself.

[-] Goretantath@lemm.ee 56 points 2 months ago

Remember, theres a gigantic difference between the wealth of a billionaire and the wealth of a millionaire. For one thing, its possible to make a million without harming others, a BILLION though, you HAVE to sacrifice others to achieve.

[-] Revan343@lemmy.ca 44 points 2 months ago

The difference between a million dollars and a billion dollars is about a billion dollars

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

While the guy happened to manage to acquire almost $400 million by selling his company, it seems that he's really trying to do some good with that, quite frankly, ridiculous amount of money.

Also it seems that his employees were compensated somewhat above market rate while he owned the company.

Not exactly a dragon of his own making, we shall observe his career with great interest to see if he follows what seems to be his chosen path, as of now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Harvey656@lemmy.world 36 points 2 months ago

Some rocker tried to do that in LA and they arrested him and kicked out all the homeless.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago

Why can't other people be more like this? Go Marcel!

[-] F_OFF_Reddit@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago

When the time comes we let this one unbothered

[-] misteloct@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

I applaud the project but I'd still eat him. He is a near billionaire CEO throwing a few scraps to us commoners. Maybe his PR team can make me look good too as I go for seconds.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Zink@programming.dev 28 points 2 months ago

“I won the parent lottery, the education lottery, the country lottery,” LeBrun told Macleans. “It would be arrogant to say every piece of my ‘success’ was earned, when so much of it was received.”

Looks like he did this because he’s actually a decent reasonable person.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Imagine if the public sector did this and didn't limit it to a single development.

We could even build bigger-than-tiny sized units. Maybe include additional amenities like schools and health clinics and food malls in the immediate vicinity. Throw in a rail stop so people can get to the metro center easily. You know... actual urban development.

No idea where we could get money for that, though. Maybe if Canada didn't exempt 50% of capital gains income from taxation for some reason... But no, that would never work.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] prole 24 points 2 months ago

This is how fucking easy it is. This is a millionaire. Imagine what someone with hundreds of billions of dollars could do.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] RizzoTheSmall@lemm.ee 23 points 2 months ago

Dude's getting 20k/mo rent and helping the poor. That's fucking awesome.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 2 months ago
[-] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 2 months ago

Honestly when I see "tech millionaire" and "altruism" in the same article, I expect to seese seriously ghoulish shit.

I still have concerns around the long-term outcome - the land is ostensibly still privately held, and I assume the homes are as well. I'd like to

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] witty_username@feddit.nl 19 points 2 months ago

Rember kids; philanthropy is advantageous upon failure of collective efforts

[-] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 months ago

Honestly when I see "tech millionaire" and "altruism" in the same article, I don't expect to see someone actually using their wealth to do something decent.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

This is good, but if we address this at a systemic level, we don't need to put people in tiny low-density homes unconnected to anything for it to be affordable.

China addresses it by looking at how much labor and materials is required and ensuring the price of concrete, steel, glass, etc is sufficiently low for the number of homes they need constructed, and that there is enough of each type of skilled labor that goes into building a home.

Presumably local governments have some mechanism for when they know a house costs X materials and Y labor, and they see new construction costing significantly more than that.

The result is detached homes@avg 75USD/sqft and apartments@55/sqft. With current interest rates of 6.768%, you'd get ~400 sqft homes with a $200/mo 30 year mortgage at those prices, 600sqft if interest rates were 3%.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Rent pricing is what the people should target first. Hard to fight the nutjobs when rent is so expensive

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 months ago

As for the residents of the houses, rent is kept at 30% of income, which means the large majority of residents pay a maximum of $200 — including all utilities and internet — every month.

How are they planning to sustain this long-term?

Surely, someone is paying for the difference. Unless I totally missed it from the article 🫣

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 months ago

You're one of today's lucky 10,000! Landlords typically charge even more than the cost of building and maintaining the house, and then just pocket the rest as profit. It's bonkers!

[-] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 13 points 2 months ago

He donated money to pay for the housing units, possibly the land. So that's probably all paid off. There are still taxes and utilities to pay for, which is probably where the rent is going.

This is just an educated guess though.

[-] EchoCT@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 months ago

It's why the tech millionaire financing this isn't a tech billionaire.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
1051 points (100.0% liked)

Good News Everyone

1718 readers
1 users here now

A place to post good news and prevent doom scrolling!

Rules for now:

  1. posts must link from a reliable news source
  2. no reposts
  3. paywalled articles must be made available
  4. avoid politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS