He's up to some bullshit now. Distract people with the JFK papers whilst he executes Daddy Pussytin's bidding.
Not even. It's a two-pronged populist treat.
-
You did the thing and released the docs.
-
No matter what comes out, it will be boring and droll. And the documents being old means there will be gaps. That allllllllllll pushes the far right conspiracy loons directly into "tha Deep State did um!"
This is how you virtue signal on the right. If there was anything juicy in those files it would have been headlined by the White House already. His idiot followers now pat themselves on the back for this "great win against the swamp", while never reading a single line themselves from the records and forgetting all about it by tomorrow. Great distraction, but now I'm curios what Trump is trying to distract from.
now I'm curious what Trump is trying to distract from
/Gestures around generally
thumbs through Foundation of Geopolitics
I think we're at the bit where Ukraine gets annexed but i skimmed so maybe I'm wrong.
Epstein files.
Violating court orders
who cares? I’d rather know why certain media is not available to consume on certain platforms. the guy got shot like 70 years ago. so what?
Sure but remember the staunchest Republicans may largely be boomers in their 60s and 70s. For many of them, JFK was in their formative years and had immense staying power in their minds and in media for years and years and years afterward. Not unlike 9/11 to 14-year-old me and the ensuing two decades of massive longlasting consequences -- whether I like it or not, it was a singular event that defined a generation
Tuesday's release represents a small, outstanding tranche of the more than six million pages of records collected by the National Archives -- the majority of which have already been declassified and are available online or in person for review, according to the agency.
So not quite as spectacular as will probably be heralded by Trump's followers. But maybe there's some new information in the minority of new pages/documents that could be off interest to JFK conspiracy theorists.
There will be nothing new. Its just another distraction technique to keep people talking about things other than the awful things Trump is doing.
They're not going to release anything that hasn't been released already. It's another method of flooding the zone with garage and distractions from what people need to be paying attention to
unredacted Epstein’s or I sleep
Goodnight
I knew it, Betty Crocker assassinated JFK. She's always cooking up something.
She famously said, "let them eat cake".
As she baked them a 6 tier poison one!
😂 Trump is so untrustworthy I can already tell these files contain nothing of substance that wasn't already known. More BS lip service from our resident traitor-in-chief.
If it were somehow revealed he was assassinated by the CIA or secret service or some other government agency, what exactly would that do at this point? Give Trump an excuse to dismantle it and authorize the creation of a new intelligence/enforcement agency with deeper and more covert and loyal power tendrils, like a new SS?
Accidental discharge by a hungover secret servicemen is actually a reasonably plausible scenario from what I've read, and yes, you're spot-on.
The current secret service also investigates financial crimes, which is politically unwise under an avowed financial crook president.
Yeah, this is the theory that I've held since seeing a documentary investigating the whole incident. And for the life of me I cannot recall the name.
I find it far easier to believe the CIA would scramble to cover up a colossal fuck-up over any shadowy conspiracy of assassination. Incompetence is more reliable than competence, in a way.
God, can you imagine killing JFK by accident and having to sit on that secret forever because the FBI doesn’t want to get a bad reputation?
News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.