414
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PeteZa@lemm.ee 4 points 2 hours ago

I am pretty sick of the Democrats bullshit, but I’m even more sick of the Republicans bullshit.

I hate it here.

[-] quack@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 hours ago

Libs be libbing

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 4 points 3 hours ago

Like they were ever going to.

If she was going to do something different to what the party wants, she'd never have been their nominee to start with.

[-] head_socj@midwest.social 9 points 5 hours ago

Color me surprised that the Democrats have as much blame for our current situation as the Republicans. Nobody, NOBODY, wanted to return to normal; they wanted real change and the best they got was state-sponsored financing for tech companies and unequal economic policies

[-] nul42@lemmy.ca 16 points 12 hours ago

Wow, so if true this implies that in the Democratic party even the women running for president has to do what the big man says. Hope this is false.

[-] shiiika@midwest.social 2 points 4 hours ago

It's definitely not false, it's the playbook all of the political giants have been running for very many years now.

[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 9 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Hillary was going to continue Obamas policies, more or less. its purely sexism why both female candidates never won, sprinkled a little racism.

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

Or, only people with certain beliefs have the backing/money to get to the top of a US political party.

They didn't win because their policies don't reflect the worker base.

Or else what? Withdraw the nomination? (You can't withdraw a nomination lol)

Harris chose this

[-] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago

Cut off funding, maybe. They would have guaranteed a loss with that maneuver thoug.

[-] techclothes@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

Even this seems far fetched. Why would they risk something like that in an election that had so much hanging on it.

[-] quack@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

They were already hanging the future of the country on an old man who struggled to stay awake through press conferences.

[-] Floppybutton@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

I'm convinced that the DNC isn't worried about winning any more races than they have to do that they survive as a political entity. Just going off the push the minority leaders have been making and the stream of emails and phone calls I get, as someone registered independent.

I see and hear nothing about actual policy change or progressivism from the names in the critical positions, and a lot about donations to "help us win next time, guys, for real this time!"

My senators (both women, both dems), haven't actually responded to any of my calls, emails, or letters asking for their stances or plans for change. I have got several form responses that end with a call for donations, though. 🤷

[-] alkbch@lemmy.ml 4 points 16 hours ago
[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago

Oh? Pulling a “Republican”? My wife made me do it? Wasn’t my fault? Attempting to distance herself so she can make a run for office again.

[-] Zzyzx 36 points 1 day ago

Yeah, seriously. She's an adult. She could have just said "Thanks Joe, now go away." What could he have done? Fired her?

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

She was elected, not appointed. She could say and do what she wanted and theres not much Biden could have done about it.

[-] alkbch@lemmy.ml 2 points 16 hours ago
[-] thepresentpast@lemm.ee 4 points 15 hours ago

I did, when I voted for Joe Biden, as did the rest of us.

[-] alkbch@lemmy.ml 2 points 15 hours ago

You voted for Joe Biden, not for Kamala Harris

[-] thepresentpast@lemm.ee 6 points 15 hours ago

I voted for Joe Biden and Kamala Harris with the explicit understanding that should Joe Biden become unable to serve, that duty would fall to Kamala Harris.

I understand how elections actually work. Don't apply your own ignorance to other people.

[-] alkbch@lemmy.ml 4 points 14 hours ago

She was not elected to the the presidential candidate for 2024, she was anointed by the party without an open primary.

If you can’t have a conversation without resorting to character attacks, that says a lot about your (lack of) character.

[-] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If anyone wants some good rage material, watch the Pod Save America interview with Harris staffers

[-] imetators@lemm.ee 3 points 8 hours ago

Omg, only 15 mins in and I can't listen this anymore. When she said "finally turn the page", maaaaan. Did she wrote all Kamala's speeches or smth? And again, instead of talking what was wrong, they just say that during a race their point is was to remind how bad it 3as during Trumps first presidency. Not what people are complaining about RIGHT NOW, but rather about how bad the orange man is. He is, we know. But that is not a solid and the only base to run on. There are much more serious issues in US than orange man bad which went undressed. And I am not even form US.

They could win by running Healthcare revamp, education revamp and tax revamp. But all these things are going against their sponsors interests. Us now is a fail state. Let us hope 2028 will be an actual page turn with fresh minds in the race.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
414 points (100.0% liked)

politics

21970 readers
3969 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS