436
submitted 1 month ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 83 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

For how many years have Republicans gone on about the constitution and the first amendment, and cried censorship at the slightest criticism of their utterances? And now Trump is explicitly having people arrested and deported for vocing opinions, and Republicans range from silent to enthusiastic. They never believed in the constitution or in free speech. They just didn't like it when people disagreed with them.

[-] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

At this point, the attempts to explain to the uneducated are futile, there is no going back.

Americans, sadly even the good ones, will now reap what the R's have sown.

There is nothing left to defend if nobody is willing to defend it.

[-] Glide@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 month ago

They never believed in the constitution or in free speech. They just didn't like it when people disagreed with them.

The evidence has always been in their actions. Hate speech hampers freedom of speech, and they wanted to protect hate speech. This puts them in direct conflict with a genuinely free society.

Preserving the greatest amount of freedom for the greatest amount of people usually means giving up some smaller specific freedoms, like, you know, the freedom to threaten the lives of minorities.

[-] 4am@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

Maybe this time explaining this in reaction to them behaving this way for the millionth time in the last 50 years will get em.

No? Maybe we should take action instead. This is no surprise. We know what they are.

[-] qkalligula@my-place.social 59 points 1 month ago

@silence7

Surely he will be held accountable, right? Right?

🫠

[-] squirrel 29 points 1 month ago

The Free Speech crowd will be here any minute now! /s

[-] moot@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

One day he'll be convicted in the court of public opinion but by then Not Sure will be the smartest person in history and President Camacho will pardon him.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

I'd say he's gonna be the bad guy in the documentary, but he's gonna be the bad guy in the cautionary warning we leave to any spacefaring species that finds our ruins on the dead earth.

[-] CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca 52 points 1 month ago

Soon, he will begin borrowing from Putin's book by making criticising the government illegal, and forcing news organizations to register as foreign agents.

[-] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So… back to Tritler Bingo….

Did anyone have:

Trump not only takes a page from Hitler’s playbook, but openly recites it for all to hear?

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 month ago

He spent a lot of time preparing for that.

Ivana Trump told her lawyer Michael Kennedy that from time to time her husband reads a book of Hitler’s collected speeches, My New Order, which he keeps in a cabinet by his bed. Kennedy now guards a copy of My New Order in a closet at his office, as if it were a grenade. Hitler’s speeches, from his earliest days up through the Phony War of 1939, reveal his extraordinary ability as a master propagandist.

“Did your cousin John give you the Hitler speeches?” I asked Trump.

Trump hesitated. “Who told you that?”

“I don’t remember,” I said.

“Actually, it was my friend Marty Davis from Paramount who gave me a copy of Mein Kampf, and he’s a Jew.” (“I did give him a book about Hitler,” Marty Davis said. “But it was My New Order, Hitler’s speeches, not Mein Kampf. I thought he would find it interesting. I am his friend, but I’m not Jewish.”)

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

Hitler’s speeches, from his earliest days up through the Phony War of 1939, reveal his extraordinary ability as a master propagandist.

That's not quite true. Hitler wasn't an effective speaker when he started, knew it, and got a lot of coaching. From the beginning, when he was an Army snitch spying on the fascists, he was being groomed.

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago

Yeah man. It's the free space in the center. You got to read the full board.

[-] weirdboy@lemm.ee 21 points 1 month ago
[-] banazir@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I would love to hear him cite the exact laws he thinks they have broken and in what way.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

"I'm the President, and I say it's illegal, so it's illegal! Isn't that how it works?"

[-] allidoislietomyself@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Unfortunately at this moment in time it seems to be that way.

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago

Translation: "Illegal" -> "Waah, me no like!"

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

A sure sign of a stable, competent, and entirely not corrupt leader if I've ever seen one!

[-] kane@femboys.biz 5 points 1 month ago

If you start looking, you will always find something in such a large organization. Whether that’s worth it, well…

[-] bdot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

i have run out of things to say about what’s going on with him. all the shitty awful things he says/does/will do.

all i have left now is “this fucking guy”

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Once donvict can finish the creation of The Ministry of Love, he'll be able to sic the Thought Police on these illegal news outlets.

Meanwhile, the Ministry of Truth will be very busy putting out the real news. Faux, Breitbart, Newsmax, OAN, and a whole lot of podcasters and youtubers are going to be subsidiaries in this new glorious world of free speech maximalism.

[-] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I guess if you make all of the articles about journalists being traumatized then you get no stories about the other victims...

this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025
436 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23300 readers
2651 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS