180

Summary

Hundreds of NOAA employees, including National Weather Service meteorologists, were fired Thursday as part of Elon Musk’s cuts to the federal workforce under Trump.

The layoffs, affecting up to 10% of NOAA’s workforce, targeted probationary employees.

Lawmakers and experts condemned the cuts, warning they will jeopardize public safety and disaster preparedness.

Rep. Grace Meng (D-N.Y.) called the firings “unconscionable,” while climate scientists warned they would weaken the country’s ability to respond to extreme weather and climate disasters.

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] WarlockoftheWoods@lemy.lol 2 points 1 hour ago

Gonna be a real shame when all those trump supporting midwesterners get their trailers leveled by a storm that could have been predicted but wasn't. Oh well...

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago

Just in time for hurricanes and tornadoes...

[-] Grunt4019@lemm.ee 3 points 14 hours ago

What’s the point of this? From their perspective? I don’t get it.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Petty revenge for contradicting trump about that one hurricane.

[-] GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago

Probabaly a mix of lowering government costs to give billionaires a tax break and if we don't monitor it the climate change numbers don't get worse.

[-] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago

Also, private companies selling you tornado warnings for the small price of 50 dollar/month soon.

[-] lunsjentilanette@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 hours ago

But arent services like accuweather just reselling data gathered and processed by NOAA?

[-] GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Yes. I have a friend in meteorology and they said that the Weather Channel doesn't actually have any meteorologists on staff, they just repackage what NOAA and the NWS report instead of crunching numbers themselves.

[-] Ace0fBlades@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago

This has been one of my biggest worries this go around. The national weather service provides intensely important information and provides it freely. At this point, I'm waiting for them to hack it up and sell the remains to the parasites at AccuWeather or something and start charging for what was always a free product.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Didn't AccuWeather mostly just pull from nws anyway? Now they'll need to do all that work themselves and it won't be free anymore.

[-] spamfajitas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 21 hours ago

That's the thing that's confused me a bit. Project 2025 definitely calls for the dismantling and privatization of NOAA, but I didn't see anything specifically mentioning AccuWeather. IIRC the CEO of AccuWeather said it'd be way too costly for them to pick up all of the responsibilities they depend on NOAA for. At this point, I'd fully expect Musk to say his companies can handle it.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 6 points 22 hours ago

They won’t do it themselves. They can’t. They’ll just offer a worse forecast.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 4 points 1 day ago

Also nws gets data from private entities which may not be as hot to share with a for profit that competes with them.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I wonder where they'll find the money

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 10 points 21 hours ago

The next hurricane season might have just gotten very interesting. Nobody will tell the good people on Florida or Texas about all that nasty climate change, or the hurricanes that will come because the Hottub of America (formerly known as the Gulf of Mexico) will turboboost more smaller storms to nasty little category 5s. No annoying evac orders! Hurray! Americans just take things as they come!

[-] NotLemming@lemm.ee 5 points 20 hours ago

Lol exactly what I thought. Hurricanes are fake news though right?

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Just like global warning, all just leftist inventions.

Wait until Trump decides to defend Florida from an evil, Democrat-made hurricane by fighting it with nuclear bombs like he once said.

[-] jewbacca117@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

Bets on how long until Mar a Lago is underwater

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Is there something like underwater golfing?

[-] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

Extra note on this. NWS's agenda also includes educating people about weather and climate and other things. Our engineering class about rainfall and such basically is in chaos right now because the person from NWS teaching it is no longer working there. So this will have long impact for future generations. Specifically since our engineering department already is very tiny compared to other departments.

[-] makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

Great decision right as we head into hurricane season. At least we haven't been setting records for the number and intensity of hurricanes, or this would be extra stupid

/s

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Excellent job republiQans and non-voters. Once again your vision and wisdom shine forth like a beacon in the darkness.

[-] NotLemming@lemm.ee 1 points 20 hours ago

What happened with the whole Qanon thing, haven't heard anything about that for a while

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

According to the New York Times it was all true and Trump was right about everything.

[-] NotLemming@lemm.ee 1 points 19 hours ago

Yikes. So Qanon was cooked up by Russia to gather the conspiracy theorists and mentally ill who would support fascism in the US?

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

No, I actually think it was just dipshit 4channers riffing which then got picked up by some opportunistic douchebags who were then co-opted by russia to divide the US and lay the groundwork for fascism.

[-] jhymesba@lemmy.world 1 points 42 minutes ago

Exactly this. Russia doesn't have to do a lot of work here. Most of this bullshit is home grown. Russia just amplifies it.

[-] Kittybeer@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago
this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
180 points (100.0% liked)

politics

20473 readers
2625 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS