22
submitted 9 hours ago by Sunshine@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] marathon@thelemmy.club 1 points 8 hours ago

I am annoyed by the LPC's prorogue of parliament (Trudeau). If Carney wins, we'll have an unelected PM of Canada, which seems to be the most likely outcome.

[-] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 10 points 5 hours ago

We don't elect the PM

[-] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 19 points 8 hours ago

I don’t disagree, but as soon as parliament resumes we’re getting an election.

The only way that doesn’t happen is if the NDP look at their polling numbers and decide to hold off for a new leader, which they should have done a month ago like the Liberals did.

Honestly though proroguing is probably the best thing that could have happened. If they hadn’t done so we’d have majority PM Pollievre, the death of the Liberal party, and would be stuck with Singh for the foreseeable future.

Now we’re getting an actual competitive liberal party and a real election, with real hope for Canada in the future.

Pollievre has always been a protest vote candidate and the drop in their numbers shows Canadians have little faith in him. He’s one of the least popular leaders in Canadian history. All hat and no cattle.

[-] Chip_Rat@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago

I'm annoyed as well, but the opposition has made clear that they will take the government down and force an election if they are permitted. And they will do that once the Liberals have their new leader and end proroguing. (Prorogation?)

Do you think it serves the people to not know who the liberal leader will be, or to not hold a proper election for that leader, so we can rush to an election early?

I think people who think that's a good idea probably have goals that skew more towards "anything to give MY team the upper hand!" than "I would like the population to be informed and given the best from the choices available from each party."

In a perfect world, the opposition would also feel this way and government wouldn't have to be shut down while the liberals have their race.

[-] marathon@thelemmy.club 2 points 8 hours ago

I sincerely believe that a country's leader should always be elected and not appointed, regardless of the outcome of an election. The LPC isn't 'we the people'. 🤷‍♂️

[-] morbidcactus@lemmy.ca 20 points 8 hours ago

Our prime minister is technically never elected by the general population, the PM requires confidence of the house, there's no requirement for them to even be an MP, which has happened in the past.

[-] Chip_Rat@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago

I mostly agree, though Canadas system is based on electing a local representative that forms the government, so that's not actually how our democracy works. But either way that will happen with no complaints from me once the Liberals have elected their leader and PP forces an election.

[-] Kichae@lemmy.ca 7 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Parliament also is not "we the people". And yet, it is Parliament that elects the Prime Minister. The they are under no obligation to elect someone who is a sitting MP. They never have been.

[-] marathon@thelemmy.club 4 points 7 hours ago

Parliament is elected, so of course they represent 'we the people'.

[-] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 hours ago

I think your opinion is heavily influenced by American politics and doesn't align with how parliamentary democracies work.

If Parliament is "we the people" and they vote to make decisions on every aspect of governance as your representative, how come them electing the Prime Minister is so offensive to you?

You shouldn't even really be voting purely along party lines, you elect your local representative and they represent you. You should evaluate them on their own merits. They often vote along party lines, but even if "your party" wins your local election or even the most seats that doesn't mean they get to form government without the support of a majority of Parliament. It's always been this way, at no point do you ever make a direct decision on who leads.

[-] marathon@thelemmy.club 1 points 26 minutes ago

If Parliament is “we the people” and they vote to make decisions on every aspect of governance as your representative, how come them electing the Prime Minister is so offensive to you?

You're not paying attention. Where did I say that parliament electing the PM is offensive to me? What I am saying that the PM being appointed by non-elected members of the LPC is offensive to me. It's not parliament doing it, but the Liberal Party of Canada members voting for their next leader of the party, which is then automatically the PM. Helluva difference.

[-] Leeny@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 hour ago

1 day old account, look at the post history. I doubt that person is even Canadian.

this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
22 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

8035 readers
854 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS