361
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] garretble@lemmy.world 47 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The United States sucks ass right now. Please, by all means, take charge without us.

Signed,

A resident of the United States

[-] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago

We hope your country stops being so batshit crazy soon.

Sincerely, Most of the rest of the world

[-] samus12345@lemm.ee 11 points 2 days ago

I think it's gonna have to collapse before that will happen. Please help hasten it by imposing sanctions on anything and everything that has to do with us.

[-] tja@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

We would prefer it if you had our back. So please do sth to fix it

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

It's stuck!

[-] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 6 points 2 days ago

The UK public… having broadly socialist views but voting Tory ever since the Whigs stopped being a thing.

[-] svcg 1 points 1 day ago

I think this is largely untrue. The public might have slightly left-wing views when it comes to the economy and state services, but I'd stake any money that if it was remotely feasible to build a net down the middle of the English channel to keep out the small boats, they'd be clamouring for it.

[-] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago
[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The bully has continuously won the last 500 years or so and it was us (especially the us in the UK). But we have some redemption to do and should try to be on the good side of history for once.

[-] samus12345@lemm.ee 14 points 2 days ago

No working with Nazis.

[-] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 days ago

Honestly, I don't think maintaining good relations with the US is something we should be doing at all.

[-] boreengreen@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago
[-] samus12345@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago

Yes, by bowing and scraping to Dear Leader. But you wouldn't get anything out of it, so I can't fathom why anyone would want to.

[-] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

American checking in. They are correct.

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Hey, Germany... Y'all want to keep the old "East Germany"?

You better fucking tell every EU country to defend Ukraine!

[-] albert180@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago

That's not a really good point. Most people would love to get rid of those Nazis, People loving to play the eternal victim role, and being a drag on our economy

[-] natarey@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

The Americans were always a bunch of evil, self-interested bastards — all that’s changed is they’ve stopped pretending otherwise.

[-] randomname@scribe.disroot.org 23 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

We must not pigeonhole people, not in the US nor anywhere else. As I write this comment there are apparently two US citizens in this thread who definitely don't appear to fit into your description. [Edit typo.]

[-] Windex007@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

That's got the same energy as a cop showing up to protest the term "ACAB".

Don't like hearing it? Fix it. And that doesn't mean reposting shit to your echo chamber of choice. That doesn't mean standing with a sign. If you haven't lit something on fire you're part of the problem just like all the "good cops".

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Okay, thanks!

[-] natarey@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Are you not aware how metonymy works? Of course there are nice Americans. There are nice people everywhere. “The Americans” here is being used as a stand in for the actions of their government for at least the last sixty years. Longer, if you include the centuries of land theft, genocide, slaving, pillage, and terror. All of these acts were sanctioned by a government that was elected, supported, and funded by American citizens. This is who they are. The presence of a few friendly faces in a sea of greedy, rapacious cunts doesn’t change much.

[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 days ago

Fine, but such a result isn't exactly surprising with a leading question like that 🙄

[-] tja@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago
[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 days ago

Its not really an either or question, and if you explicitly want to ask that you should do so by asking something like "Should the UK support Ukraine against the objections of the US?" Or something concrete like that.

The way the current question is asked leads to the answer as expected as "support" is positively connotated and "maintain good relations" is ambigous and doesn't make the contradiction clear, hence people opting for the feel good answer of supporting Ukraine.

[-] samus12345@lemm.ee 7 points 2 days ago

It is an either/or question, because the US government does not support Ukraine any more and will condemn any country that does.

[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That's my point. The original question is not a real either/or question. It's a leading question that pretends to be either/or.

Edit: looking at the down votes I think some people here really need to practise their reading comprehension.

[-] albert180@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago

Look at all those Ghost drivers!

this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2025
361 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

2531 readers
1311 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS