17

cross-posted from: https://scribe.disroot.org/post/9485476

A new Which? investigation has found potentially lethal knock-off chargers still being sold on online marketplaces seven years after the consumer champion first exposed the danger they pose to UK consumers.

More than half of cheap charger bought from Amazon, eBay, AliExpress, Temu and others fail safety checks or miss legally required product markings.

Archived version

Here is the link to the original study by the consumer group Which?

Cheap phone chargers sold on some of Britain’s biggest online marketplaces can explode, catch fire or electrocute users, according to safety tests by Which?.

An investigation by the consumer group found that nine out of fifteen USB phone chargers bought from retailers including Amazon, eBay, AliExpress, B&Q Marketplace and Debenhams Marketplace failed electrical safety tests. Some were found to contain lumps of modelling clay to make them feel more substantial.

Every charger tested was also found to be missing legally required information on its packaging, documentation or the product itself, meaning none could legally be sold in the UK.

The findings are likely to increase pressure on ministers to use new powers to force online marketplaces to take greater responsibility for the safety of products sold by third-party agents.

...

The findings come despite repeated warnings about unsafe electrical products sold online. Which? first highlighted dangerous chargers on major marketplaces in 2019 and has since carried out a series of investigations into potentially hazardous products sold through third-party platforms.

...

Which? is calling on the government to use powers contained in the Product Regulation and Metrology Act, which received royal assent last year, to impose explicit legal duties on online marketplaces to ensure products sold through their platforms are safe.

...

The legislation allows ministers to introduce new requirements through secondary legislation but the government has yet to bring forward detailed rules. A consultation on potential changes was launched recently.

Consumer groups argue that the delay is allowing unsafe goods to continue reaching British households.

...

Amazon said customer safety was a top priority and that it had removed the products highlighted by Which?. AliExpress said both identified products had been removed and affected customers would be informed of the risks. Debenhams said it had removed the listing and was contacting customers to offer refunds.

eBay said that all of the products identified in the investigation had already been removed through its existing safety processes before Which? shared its findings and pointed to measures that it said prevented 21 million potentially unsafe listings from appearing on the site last year.

Temu and Shein said they had removed or suspended the relevant listings while reviewing compliance with British labelling and documentation requirements.

18

A new Which? investigation has found potentially lethal knock-off chargers still being sold on online marketplaces seven years after the consumer champion first exposed the danger they pose to UK consumers.

More than half of cheap charger bought from Amazon, eBay, AliExpress, Temu and others fail safety checks or miss legally required product markings.

Archived version

Here is the link to the original study by the consumer group Which?

Cheap phone chargers sold on some of Britain’s biggest online marketplaces can explode, catch fire or electrocute users, according to safety tests by Which?.

An investigation by the consumer group found that nine out of fifteen USB phone chargers bought from retailers including Amazon, eBay, AliExpress, B&Q Marketplace and Debenhams Marketplace failed electrical safety tests. Some were found to contain lumps of modelling clay to make them feel more substantial.

Every charger tested was also found to be missing legally required information on its packaging, documentation or the product itself, meaning none could legally be sold in the UK.

The findings are likely to increase pressure on ministers to use new powers to force online marketplaces to take greater responsibility for the safety of products sold by third-party agents.

...

The findings come despite repeated warnings about unsafe electrical products sold online. Which? first highlighted dangerous chargers on major marketplaces in 2019 and has since carried out a series of investigations into potentially hazardous products sold through third-party platforms.

...

Which? is calling on the government to use powers contained in the Product Regulation and Metrology Act, which received royal assent last year, to impose explicit legal duties on online marketplaces to ensure products sold through their platforms are safe.

...

The legislation allows ministers to introduce new requirements through secondary legislation but the government has yet to bring forward detailed rules. A consultation on potential changes was launched recently.

Consumer groups argue that the delay is allowing unsafe goods to continue reaching British households.

...

Amazon said customer safety was a top priority and that it had removed the products highlighted by Which?. AliExpress said both identified products had been removed and affected customers would be informed of the risks. Debenhams said it had removed the listing and was contacting customers to offer refunds.

eBay said that all of the products identified in the investigation had already been removed through its existing safety processes before Which? shared its findings and pointed to measures that it said prevented 21 million potentially unsafe listings from appearing on the site last year.

Temu and Shein said they had removed or suspended the relevant listings while reviewing compliance with British labelling and documentation requirements.

63

Petition closes on 10 December 2026.

Previously, the NHS Service Standard held that “public services are built with public money, so unless there's a good reason not to, the code they're based on should be made available for other people to reuse and build on.” This is what the current policy should be reverted to.

NHS England has issued guidance, called SDLC-8, which requires that all source code repositories be private from the 11th of May, 2026, unless there is an exceptional need, approved by the Engineering Board.

The Free Software Foundation Europe have warned that open repositories allow security researchers to inspect and report vulnerabilities, and that de-publishing code does nothing to prevent attackers from analysing already-deployed systems, binaries, or previously copied source code.

[-] randomname@scribe.disroot.org 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes, and at the same time, Apple has been surrendering to all censorship and surveillance rules made by China without delay.

There is an old documentary from 2021, Profiting from authoritarianism - How Tim Cook surrendered Apple to the Chinese government (Invidious link),

and another one from 2025, Apple's unsolvable China problem - How Apple sold its soul to an authoritarian regime (Invidious link).

I hope the EU doesn't give in as it did all too often imo.

6

Archived version

Cybersecurity researchers have warned of a "resurgence and expansion" of JDY, a covert network associated with China-nexus state-sponsored threat actors.

"The JDY botnet comprises over 1,500 SOHO [small office and home office] and IoT devices and operates as a centrally controlled, high-performance scanner used to discover, fingerprint, and continuously map exposed services at scale," Lumen's Black Lotus Labs said in a report shared with The Hacker News.

JDY was first flagged as a cluster within another botnet codenamed KV-botnet in mid-December 2023. Primarily used for broader scanning against internet targets, the stealthy network comprising compromised SOHO routers, firewalls, and IoT devices has been put to use by Chinese hacking groups like Volt Typhoon.

...

96

Apple blames DMA for delaying Siri AI in Europe. The EU says nothing is stopping Apple from launching it.

Archived version

...

Jan Penfrat, a senior policy adviser for European Digital Rights (EDRi) ... sees Apple’s latest moves as a means of putting pressure on the EU Commission to allow it to break the DMA. “It’s very much a lobbying tactic,” he said. “The problem is not the DMA but Apple refusing to open up its competition-busting software ecosystem.”

For Michael Veale, a professor of technology law and policy at University College London, the core issue is that Apple is making an exception to its own long-standing privacy and security setup “in order to stay relevant and in the game” when it comes to AI. “Apple’s privacy and security model is built like a Jenga tower, based on extreme vertical control by the firm, and risks collapsing when interoperability is introduced.” In other words: Apple’s comfortable altering its own practices for Siri AI, giving the AI the ability to access lots of data across different apps, but argues the same kind of access is too dangerous when competitors ask for it.

Veale and Penfrat both said there’s no way to properly assess Apple’s proposed solution because the company has not made it public. Other experts, such as [the professor of competition law and digital regulation at Tilburg University in the Netherlands, Friso] Bostoen, questioned why Apple needs as long as 18 months to implement it, given the interoperability requirements were predictable and should have been addressed in parallel with the development of Siri AI.

...

12

cross-posted from: https://scribe.disroot.org/post/9446418

The deadly crackdown on the December 2025-January 2026 anti-regime protests saw many Iranians killed, tracked or detained. The US-Israel war on Iran has intensified the repression, but it has not stopped families from trying to trace their missing loved ones or from seeking justice for people who have disappeared into prisons and juvenile correction centres across the country.

...

The war broke out just a few weeks after the latest protests, which were initially driven by deteriorating living conditions, before evolving into a widespread movement challenging the regime. The conflict has also disrupted efforts by several Iranian NGOs outside the country to document the scale of the crackdown.

In a comprehensive report published in late February, the Virginia-based NGO, Human Rights Activists in Iran (HRAI), recorded 6,488 confirmed and verified deaths of protesters. An additional 11,744 cases remain “under review and are not included in confirmed totals", the report noted.

...

Dozens of protesters arrested during the December-January uprisings have been charged with attacking security forces or trespassing on military installations and sentenced to death. Some have already been executed.

...

The detainees also include minors. In a report on the repression of schoolchildren, the New York-based Center for Human Rights in Iran states that hundreds of children have been arbitrarily detained, subjected to enforced disappearance, and denied access to their families and legal counsel. The NGO reported that at least 216 children had been killed during the protests.

...

[There are also] reports on the case of Diana Taherabadi, a 16-year-old high school student, who was arrested at her home in late January and is being held at the Kachoui Juvenile Rehabilitation and Correctional Centre.

“Sources close to the student's family have reported that confessions were extracted from her during her detention, a claim that has not been independently verified. However, during her judicial hearing, she rejected the charges brought against her and stated that she played no role in the matters attributed to her,” the media outlet reported.

...

These cases contradict statements by Iran’s Education Ministry spokesperson Ali Farhadi, who told the official ISNA news agency in early February that “thanks to the Iranian education minister’s oversight, no student remained in detention from the very first days of the unrest".

...

Despite the risks, families continue to demand justice and pay tribute to the victims of the state’s crackdown. Last week, relatives of Pajman Norooz Rajabi gathered at the spot where the 27-year-old athlete was killed by security forces on January 8 in Tonekabon, a northern Iranian city, formerly known as Shahsavar, located on the Caspian coast.

...

5

cross-posted from: https://scribe.disroot.org/post/9446418

The deadly crackdown on the December 2025-January 2026 anti-regime protests saw many Iranians killed, tracked or detained. The US-Israel war on Iran has intensified the repression, but it has not stopped families from trying to trace their missing loved ones or from seeking justice for people who have disappeared into prisons and juvenile correction centres across the country.

...

The war broke out just a few weeks after the latest protests, which were initially driven by deteriorating living conditions, before evolving into a widespread movement challenging the regime. The conflict has also disrupted efforts by several Iranian NGOs outside the country to document the scale of the crackdown.

In a comprehensive report published in late February, the Virginia-based NGO, Human Rights Activists in Iran (HRAI), recorded 6,488 confirmed and verified deaths of protesters. An additional 11,744 cases remain “under review and are not included in confirmed totals", the report noted.

...

Dozens of protesters arrested during the December-January uprisings have been charged with attacking security forces or trespassing on military installations and sentenced to death. Some have already been executed.

...

The detainees also include minors. In a report on the repression of schoolchildren, the New York-based Center for Human Rights in Iran states that hundreds of children have been arbitrarily detained, subjected to enforced disappearance, and denied access to their families and legal counsel. The NGO reported that at least 216 children had been killed during the protests.

...

[There are also] reports on the case of Diana Taherabadi, a 16-year-old high school student, who was arrested at her home in late January and is being held at the Kachoui Juvenile Rehabilitation and Correctional Centre.

“Sources close to the student's family have reported that confessions were extracted from her during her detention, a claim that has not been independently verified. However, during her judicial hearing, she rejected the charges brought against her and stated that she played no role in the matters attributed to her,” the media outlet reported.

...

These cases contradict statements by Iran’s Education Ministry spokesperson Ali Farhadi, who told the official ISNA news agency in early February that “thanks to the Iranian education minister’s oversight, no student remained in detention from the very first days of the unrest".

...

Despite the risks, families continue to demand justice and pay tribute to the victims of the state’s crackdown. Last week, relatives of Pajman Norooz Rajabi gathered at the spot where the 27-year-old athlete was killed by security forces on January 8 in Tonekabon, a northern Iranian city, formerly known as Shahsavar, located on the Caspian coast.

...

[-] randomname@scribe.disroot.org 3 points 2 days ago

I searched a bit but I didn’t find it on YouTube.

And?

17

The deadly crackdown on the December 2025-January 2026 anti-regime protests saw many Iranians killed, tracked or detained. The US-Israel war on Iran has intensified the repression, but it has not stopped families from trying to trace their missing loved ones or from seeking justice for people who have disappeared into prisons and juvenile correction centres across the country.

...

The war broke out just a few weeks after the latest protests, which were initially driven by deteriorating living conditions, before evolving into a widespread movement challenging the regime. The conflict has also disrupted efforts by several Iranian NGOs outside the country to document the scale of the crackdown.

In a comprehensive report published in late February, the Virginia-based NGO, Human Rights Activists in Iran (HRAI), recorded 6,488 confirmed and verified deaths of protesters. An additional 11,744 cases remain “under review and are not included in confirmed totals", the report noted.

...

Dozens of protesters arrested during the December-January uprisings have been charged with attacking security forces or trespassing on military installations and sentenced to death. Some have already been executed.

...

The detainees also include minors. In a report on the repression of schoolchildren, the New York-based Center for Human Rights in Iran states that hundreds of children have been arbitrarily detained, subjected to enforced disappearance, and denied access to their families and legal counsel. The NGO reported that at least 216 children had been killed during the protests.

...

[There are also] reports on the case of Diana Taherabadi, a 16-year-old high school student, who was arrested at her home in late January and is being held at the Kachoui Juvenile Rehabilitation and Correctional Centre.

“Sources close to the student's family have reported that confessions were extracted from her during her detention, a claim that has not been independently verified. However, during her judicial hearing, she rejected the charges brought against her and stated that she played no role in the matters attributed to her,” the media outlet reported.

...

These cases contradict statements by Iran’s Education Ministry spokesperson Ali Farhadi, who told the official ISNA news agency in early February that “thanks to the Iranian education minister’s oversight, no student remained in detention from the very first days of the unrest".

...

Despite the risks, families continue to demand justice and pay tribute to the victims of the state’s crackdown. Last week, relatives of Pajman Norooz Rajabi gathered at the spot where the 27-year-old athlete was killed by security forces on January 8 in Tonekabon, a northern Iranian city, formerly known as Shahsavar, located on the Caspian coast.

...

[-] randomname@scribe.disroot.org 1 points 2 days ago

This is just another cross-post from one of the ml propaganda channels using a left-wing extremist source that is known not just for its anti-Western stance but, more importantly, for spreading conspiracy theories.

156
129

Archived version

  • A German regional court has ruled that Google is directly liable for false claims in its AI-generated search overviews.
  • In this case, Google's AI had wrongly linked two publishers to scams and shady business practices.
  • The court treated the AI overviews as Google's own content and rejected Google's argument that users were responsible for fact-checking the results themselves.
[-] randomname@scribe.disroot.org 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yeah, but the US isn't the only problem. While European banks and some Canadian banks reduced their fossil financing, some US, Japanese, and Chinese banks were responsible for the largest year-on-year increases.

[-] randomname@scribe.disroot.org 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

From the original report:

-Over a third of the world’s largest banks (26 of 65) reduced their fossil financing from the previous year, with some European banks and some Canadian banks driving most of that progress.

-The remaining 39 banks moved in the opposite direction, and some US, Japanese, and Chinese banks were responsible for the largest year-on-year increases.

-On balance, the world’s 65 largest banks committed $906 billion to companies conducting business in fossil fuels in 2025, up $64 billion or 7.6% from 2024.

-Since 2021, global banks have funneled over $4.2 trillion in financing to fossil fuels, including $2.1 trillion to fossil firms in expansion.

Edit

Dealmakers and Dealtakers: Top Bank Financing by Country 2025

The US dominates as a financial center providing bank financing for fossil fuels. This petrostate also jumps off the chart (below) as the nation receiving the most fossil fuel debt from banks. In fact, US fossil fuel corporations received 45.4% of all fossil fuel financing in 2025. Comparing countries’ total bank fossil financing to their fossil fuel company borrowers, the US is an outlier. It is the only Big Six financial center [comprising the U.S., Canada, Japan, EU, China, UK] whose fossil firms receive more bank financing than its banks provide. Japanese banks, on the other hand, provide much more financing than the country’s fossil sector receives. In China, the volume of bank financing to fossil firms is about equal to the amount received by fossil firms. This is at least partly explained by China’s more insular financing model: about 86% of 2025 fossil financing from Chinese banks went to Chinese comp

[-] randomname@scribe.disroot.org 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

From the original report:

-Over a third of the world’s largest banks (26 of 65) reduced their fossil financing from the previous year, with some European banks and some Canadian banks driving most of that progress.

-The remaining 39 banks moved in the opposite direction, and some US, Japanese, and Chinese banks were responsible for the largest year-on-year increases.

-On balance, the world’s 65 largest banks committed $906 billion to companies conducting business in fossil fuels in 2025, up $64 billion or 7.6% from 2024.

-Since 2021, global banks have funneled over $4.2 trillion in financing to fossil fuels, including $2.1 trillion to fossil firms in expansion.

Edit

Dealmakers and Dealtakers: Top Bank Financing by Country 2025

The US dominates as a financial center providing bank financing for fossil fuels. This petrostate also jumps off the chart (below) as the nation receiving the most fossil fuel debt from banks. In fact, US fossil fuel corporations received 45.4% of all fossil fuel financing in 2025. Comparing countries’ total bank fossil financing to their fossil fuel company borrowers, the US is an outlier. It is the only Big Six financial center [comprising the U.S., Canada, Japan, EU, China, UK] whose fossil firms receive more bank financing than its banks provide. Japanese banks, on the other hand, provide much more financing than the country’s fossil sector receives. In China, the volume of bank financing to fossil firms is about equal to the amount received by fossil firms. This is at least partly explained by China’s more insular financing model: about 86% of 2025 fossil financing from Chinese banks went to Chinese comp

[-] randomname@scribe.disroot.org 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

From the original report:

-Over a third of the world’s largest banks (26 of 65) reduced their fossil financing from the previous year, with some European banks and some Canadian banks driving most of that progress.

-The remaining 39 banks moved in the opposite direction, and some US, Japanese, and Chinese banks were responsible for the largest year-on-year increases.

-On balance, the world’s 65 largest banks committed $906 billion to companies conducting business in fossil fuels in 2025, up $64 billion or 7.6% from 2024.

-Since 2021, global banks have funneled over $4.2 trillion in financing to fossil fuels, including $2.1 trillion to fossil firms in expansion.

Edit

Dealmakers and Dealtakers: Top Bank Financing by Country 2025

The US dominates as a financial center providing bank financing for fossil fuels. This petrostate also jumps off the chart (below) as the nation receiving the most fossil fuel debt from banks. In fact, US fossil fuel corporations received 45.4% of all fossil fuel financing in 2025. Comparing countries’ total bank fossil financing to their fossil fuel company borrowers, the US is an outlier. It is the only Big Six financial center [comprising the U.S., Canada, Japan, EU, China, UK] whose fossil firms receive more bank financing than its banks provide. Japanese banks, on the other hand, provide much more financing than the country’s fossil sector receives. In China, the volume of bank financing to fossil firms is about equal to the amount received by fossil firms. This is at least partly explained by China’s more insular financing model: about 86% of 2025 fossil financing from Chinese banks went to Chinese comp

[-] randomname@scribe.disroot.org 1 points 3 days ago

People don’t like genociders here.

Unfortunately this is not true for all users and all 'genociders' ... There is a community here on Lemmy that supports dictatorships, including their genocidal policies.

40

Archived version

As Iranian authorities carry out executions at a pace unmatched in decades, death row prisoners and political detainees across the country have sustained an extraordinary act of resistance: a weekly hunger strike against the death penalty that has continued for more than 120 consecutive weeks and spread to 56 prisons across the country.

For more than two years, prisoners across Iran have staged these weekly hunger strikes in protest against the state’s escalating and unlawful use of the death penalty. This campaign of resistance, by Iran’s most vulnerable people against the Islamic Republic’s most inhumane state practice, is known as “No to Execution Tuesdays.”

...

The prisoners themselves made a conscious decision from the outset to reject distinctions between political prisoners, ordinary criminal defendants, drug defendants, qisas cases, and others facing execution, instead putting the spotlight where it should be—that all executions in Iran are carried out unlawfully, after sham prosecutions and unfair trials.

At a moment when executions in Iran have reached alarming levels and political hangings are rapidly increasing, these prisoners have sustained one of the most visible and enduring campaigns against the death penalty inside Iran.

...

More Than 2100 Hanged in 2025: The Deadliest Year for Executions in Decades

The Islamic Republic of Iran is the leading per capita executioner in the world. In absolute numbers, it is second only to China.

Executions in the Islamic Republic violate every single international legal standard on the use of the death penalty. They are carried out for religious and political “crimes” and for drug offenses that are all impermissible under international law, and they are routinely handed down following grossly unfair trials, with defendants denied access to independent legal counsel and convicted solely on the basis of forced “confessions” that were extracted under torture.

...

189

Archived version

An open letter from the Document Foundation warns that Euro-Office, which is being “marketed” as the first open-source office suite developed in Europe, isn't what it seems - and may reinforce Microsoft’s closed source technology instead.

... Microsoft ... developed and controls the horrible proprietary OOXML format, designed precisely to prevent Digital Sovereignty by maintaining content lock-in. It is far less understandable on the part of companies that claim to advocate open source, such as those promoting Euro-Office.

Euro-Office defaults to the fully proprietary OOXML document format, developed and controlled solely by Microsoft. This makes it a de facto ally of Microsoft in its content lock-in strategy, with control remaining firmly in Redmond and far from Europe.

So, despite what is being written in support of Euro-Office — the latest of the office suites developed in Europe, and not the first — the announcement is not against Microsoft. On the contrary, it strengthens Microsoft’s strategy against European Digital Sovereignty, or, if you prefer, against the freedom of European users to control and manage their own content.

[-] randomname@scribe.disroot.org 50 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

... since the outbreak of the war in Israel, Beijing has classified Israel as a “high-risk area” and imposed a ban on any new Chinese investments in the country.

The South China Morning Post, a Hong Kong-based Chinese propaganda outlet, published just last week that China, Israel continue to collaborate in science and tech despite unrest in Gaza.

While Beijing supports Palestine and has a fractious relationship with Tel Aviv’s closest ally, cutting-edge innovations keep them together.

In a report published just now in February 2026, Lloyd's Bank explicitly says,

Chinese investment in Israel has grown rapidly in recent years, particularly in software, IT services and consumer electronics.

Trade between China and Israel is also at an all-time high since the outbreak of the pandemic, and this hasn't notably changed since the Gaza war (with Chinese exports to Israel have always been higher than imports from Israel, so Israel runs a trade deficit with China).

It's important to note that this Chinese Ballet Vision fund cites losses of its investment since the outbreak of the war in Gaza, and it seems this is the real issue here. China is heavily investing and trading with Israel. Nothing has changed.

This is not much more than propaganda, the numbers paint a different picture. China-Israel business ties are stronger than ever, despite Gaza.

[Edit typo.]

[-] randomname@scribe.disroot.org 107 points 10 months ago

Quick reminder that Germay's right-wing AfD is backed by China and Russia.

[-] randomname@scribe.disroot.org 59 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Ukraine's status as a new democracy and the country's obvious path toward democratic freedom was exactly the major reason why Russia started the invasion of Ukraine in 2014. The Kremlin doesn't want Russians to see that there is an alternative, freer system than Moscow's autocratic government.

[Edit typo.]

[-] randomname@scribe.disroot.org 48 points 1 year ago

Ukraine has become a hot-button political issue in Poland's crucial presidential election campaign.

Far-right populist Slawomir Mentzen, currently polling third, is virulently anti-Ukrainian and supports an "agreement" with Russia's Vladimir Putin ...

Michal Marek, who runs an NGO that monitors disinformation and propaganda in Poland, offers some examples of the anti-Ukraine material being circulated on social media. "The main narratives are that Ukrainians are stealing money from the Polish budget, that Ukrainians do not respect us, that they want to rob and kill us and are responsible for the war," he says.

"This information starts in Russian-speaking Telegram channels, and, after that, we see the same photos and the same text just translated by Google Translate. And they are pushing [the material] into the Polish infosphere."

Mr Marek links such disinformation directly with the increase in anti-Ukraine sentiment in Poland, and says an increasing number of Poles are becoming influenced by propaganda.

"But we will only see the effect after the election - what percentage of Poles want to vote for openly pro-Russian candidates."

Seems to be the same Russian disinformation campaign that we see elsewhere (and we have been observing since Feb 2022). Unfortunately, there is an audience and 'spreaders', also here on Lemmy.

As an addition:

Poland finds what it says may be foreign-funded election interference

Poland said on Wednesday it had uncovered what could be an attempt to interfere in its presidential election campaign [Poles vote in election first round on May 18] using advertisements on Facebook that may have been financed from abroad, an assertion the social media platform disputed.

European governments have been on high alert for signs of electoral interference since Romania cancelled an ongoing presidential election in December due to allegations of Russian interference ...

view more: next ›

randomname

joined 1 year ago