281
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Summary

Trump's defiance of court orders—refusing to release funds or reinstate officials—signals a dangerous drift toward dictatorship.

Courts use civil and criminal contempt to enforce orders, yet their power relies on DOJ-controlled agencies like the Marshals and Bureau of Prisons.

If the DOJ ignores or pardons contempt findings, judicial authority is undermined.

With Congress failing to check executive overreach, Trump's persistent noncompliance erodes the rule of law.

The situation risks transforming government into a dictatorship unless public outrage and political resistance reverse this trend.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 6 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

We've been in a crypto-fascist state since Dubya. We had so many rights to question our government revoked, and even the ones who loved it had theirs removed too. Loyalty to the party didn't secure anything.

This is just the final nail in the coffin. Dubya tried to pretend he was on the side of the American public. Trump doesn't. Mask off, showing what America has always wanted to do and become since Nixon.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago

Musks little brat told Trump to shut his mouth and go away the other day so at least the situation is not without some comedy. So we have that going for us. And Luigi. Not a whole lot else though.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IjjJGFCVfI&t=23s

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 15 points 1 week ago

Huh. TIL:

The looming obstacle to deployment of civil contempt against Trump’s merry band of constitutional arsonists is the reality that judges do not arrest or imprison people themselves. Nor does the judicial branch have its own armed employees to arrest those who defy its orders or its own jails in which to hold prisoners. Those jobs are performed by the U.S. Marshals Service and the Federal Bureau of Prisons … which are both components of the DOJ and are thus subordinate to the attorney general, who is subordinate to Trump. Even an order imposing a fine can be enforced only against a noncompliant defendant by action of the Justice Department.

Pretty good article on why refusing to enforce a contempt order would really be the South Bank of the Rubicon.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

Will knowing about it enable me to do literally anything about it or is this just going to give me an ulcer to go with my other old man diseases?

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago

You can do something about it every day. PolRev, 50501, inequality.org, theres a new resistance group every day. Now is the time to disobey. Cast your die.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Joining a political action committee will lack the... catharsis I'm looking for

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Then grab that catharsis! I'm about it right now.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Shrödinger's ToS violation

[-] Zorg 3 points 6 days ago
[-] venotic@kbin.melroy.org 185 points 1 week ago

We're already here. Can we stop dancing around with "here's this way you'll know" or "we're coursing towards this!"?

We. Are. Here. Already.

[-] LuxSpark@lemmy.cafe 104 points 1 week ago

Why are they talking like this might happen? JFC it's happening.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 92 points 1 week ago

The easiest sign is when you're bombarded with instructions about how to recognize if you're in a dictatorship.

[-] astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz 70 points 1 week ago

Alternatively, the easier sign (since a good chunk of the courts are complicit) is when we started being ruled by decree. The second easiest is when language is getting policed.

After checking my notes, that started January 20, 2025, when sweeping Executive Orders were decreed that are being treated as the force of law when they most certainly are not. The removal of "T" from LGBTQ, and enforcement of the stupid, unilateral renaming of the Gulf of Mexico is the other.

Congratulations, we live in a dictatorship.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago

Id argue its still in pieces thanks to the states, itll be felt more directly in say Arkansas rather than say California. Though I guess thats like comparing Nizhy Novgorod to the Vladivostok, but its still a factor to consider.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago
[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 38 points 1 week ago

LOL there's a MILLION ways we know. another big way is how the MSM fucking ignores them all

this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2025
281 points (100.0% liked)

politics

20365 readers
3035 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS