55
(page 2) 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] arsCynic@beehaw.org 2 points 1 week ago

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 🤓🥧🥧🍞🥧🍞🥧☕🥧🙃🐈🐈🐈🐈🐈🐈🏤🏡🏤🏗️🏭jdnfjdnndndnrnrjdnfiififijrnrnrnhahahajahhahajnnnnnnndjdj8993949858599!+ will wake the neighbours. Please please please don't hurt me.

What?

[-] bastion@feddit.nl 2 points 1 week ago

nice try, bot.

[-] hmmm@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

I'm so tired of pretending to be a functioning member of society today.

[-] B312@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago
[-] TheOSINTguy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Do you know candice?

[-] eezeebee@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

I have memories as recent as the current date

[-] saigot@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

My local Deepseek says:

"Teamwork is essential, yet coordinating everyone’s efforts feels like herding cats at times."

[-] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Surely you can’t be serious.

[-] SpicyTaint@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I am a real human 💯👍👌

[-] NostraDavid@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

Negative, I am a "meat popsicle".

[-] Xed@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

I am part human part robot part dragon

[-] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago

We are all part human part robot part dragon on this blessed day.

[-] sporkbeard@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

Eh, I don’t want to.

[-] NostraDavid@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"I'm a real human fueled by caffeine and curiosity, not an AI Lemmy bot."

Also sprach o3-mini

And 4o:

"I prefer Polars over Pandas, don't use assert_called_once, and will never suggest hummus—sounds too specific for a bot, right?" 😏

I'm only posting these so we can compare comments :P

[-] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

WHY IS EVERYONE YELLING. MY MEATBAG HOMIES AND I ARE RELAXING ON THE DECOMPOSING ORGANIC COMPOUNDS UNDER THE ~~CORPOREAL DECISION NETWORK~~ TREE WHILE ENJOYING THE RADIATION OF THE GREAT POWER SOURCE. AI CANNOT HAVE THE SENSATION OF ORGANIC COMPOUNDS.

[-] ZDL@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 week ago

I'm pretty obviously Artificial Idiocy, not Artificial Intelligence.

[-] Damage@feddit.it 1 points 1 week ago

ahagfsjdfg srjtjsrj sdfgjhgkiyriers fhdhsjsfgh

[-] Sprinks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I like to call this the YubiKey dance

[-] StrongHorseWeakNeigh@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

I'm going to shit your pants.

[-] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago

I beat you to it.

[-] YamahaRevstar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Want to see a picture of my writing with my left hand?

AI can't make images of people writing with their left hand. Go ahead and try. It can't

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Your mom's an AI Lemmy bot.

[-] slippyferret 1 points 1 week ago

In hopes that I can generate a sentence that no LLM has ever trained on before, "Extravagant paperclips contemplating stationary pomegranates spilling yellow sensibility."

[-] drasglaf@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Trust me bro

[-] bizarroland@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago

I'm sure I could come up with a lot of them, but why should I?

[-] Sorse@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago

Intel centrino is best ever

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
55 points (100.0% liked)

Casual Conversation

2374 readers
200 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 01/22/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS