199
submitted 1 week ago by squirrel to c/lgbtq_plus

In the wake of the anti-trans legislation by the Trump Administration, Wikipedia stands as a reliable source for information on trans topics.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 1 week ago

Bulwark: A strong structure or wall built for protection. It can also refer to something that acts as a defense against harm or threats.

It's a new one for me.

[-] flyboy_146@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Thank you! 👍🏻

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

also the sides of a ship.

[-] leaf 34 points 1 week ago

This is why Elon Musk has been whining about it so much.

[-] megopie 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think to some extent this cadre is swinging at ghosts. They were presented with inconvenient (to them) truths and rejected them. Now they construct increasingly elaborate and nonsensical alternative reasons for things being the way they are. The consistent observable realities they are encountering get written off as malicious tools of an imagined enemy. So they lash out at anything that contradicts their world view, especially when it’s evidence based and not just opinion.

It’s a fight that will never end, because they live in reality, not their idea of it. This isn’t to excuse their behavior but to say that they’re not just evil and mean or carrying out some carful plan. They’re very much making things up as they go and picking new fights as they hit roadblocks. If left in power, they will slowly destroy everything attempting to make the world fit their preconceived notions.

[-] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Until Musks goons he a hold of it

[-] leaf 18 points 1 week ago

They’re in California so there’s some buffer against that. Hopefully they have a contingency plan to move the operations to Ireland or some other full democracy. You can also download all the information through Kiwix.

[-] megopie 11 points 1 week ago

I don’t think he can, just due to the way it’s set up. Like, it’s not something that can be bought, and it’s not something the executive branch has any ability to unilaterally effect.

[-] garbagebagel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Couldn't they ban it from America? Like obv it doesn't collect data in the way tiktok does so they wouldn't have any sort of case, but I feel like they'd try to find something anyway.

[-] megopie 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That would require an act of congress, which, while not impossible, is very unlikely given the current situation. some congressional republicans are pissed at him right now, and they have an extremely slim majority, so any defections on such a vote would prevent it from passing.

[-] turmacar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Maybe?

It's relatively easy to tell an American company not to provide a product, like they did with Google/Apple and TikTok.

De-listing a website on a national level is considerably more difficult, especially without something equivalent to China's Firewall.

It's why Pirate Bay still exists.

this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
199 points (100.0% liked)

LGBTQ+

2972 readers
268 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
ada