61
all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 9 points 3 days ago

Socialism, commonly known for the very little, unimportant factor of having workers own the means of production, now includes a stock market where people can buy a share of the means of production, using capital, without ever having worked there, or anywhere, ever?

News to me.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

As a wise tankie recently said to me, about the CCP's stock market:

Owning stock in a company does not give you control over the means of production. Sorry bud.

[-] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

socialism

GDP

Ok yeah I won't even need to read the rest

[-] CarbonBasedNPU@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

I mean tbf if a single country adopted socialism it would still have a GDP of some kind as long as there was the need for goods that came from outside the country. Hell you could have the ideal communist society but would still have to trade for something because no land on earth has all of the resources a modern society needs.

[-] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I thought GDP was the gross DOMESTIC product, thus not including foreign trade. Am I wrong?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 32 points 4 days ago

There are over 800 billionaires in China... but I don't know of any factories where the workers control the means of production.

[-] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 4 days ago

800 Billionaires

What is that, CIA propaganda comrade? Please correct your source to our glorious red propaganda.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago

Sorry, I am a Western imperialist capitalist propagandist dog.

Incidentally, there are only 756 billionaires in the U.S.

[-] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 days ago

That's more like it comrade. Do that again and you'll get the wall!

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

In Hungary, a lot of companies are state owned*, I guess I now live in a communist utopia under comrade Viktor OrbΓ‘n.

* at max 25%, only so the losses can be subsidized by the state, and old people that wanted "the good old days" back could cheer that "the industries were nationalized".

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago

"NO, compromise is NOT acceptable, we MUST implement socialism NOW; otherwise you're all fascists and completely identical" - Tankies when democracy

"Um, aktually, sweatie, materialist analysis DEMANDS we be capitalist first" - Tankies when no democracy

[-] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 4 days ago

the material conditions forcing stalin to recriminialize homosexuality:

[-] Xanza@lemm.ee 25 points 4 days ago

Just had my first run-in with hexbear. Man those guys are fuckin' stupid.

[-] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 4 days ago

My condolences πŸ˜”

[-] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

If the public doesn't control the political parties or their political orientation through voting or councils, socialism is pretty useless, it could even be argued that a society with an illiberal state cannot be socialist, because while it may not have an owning class it sure has a bureaucratic ruling class.

Read: The Average Joe in China cannot decide what their workplace is doing.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 7 points 4 days ago

Mikhail Bakunin's "socialism without liberty is slavery" quote comes to mind.

[-] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 days ago

Exactly, you can't liberate people by shackling them.

But I guess war is peace, freedom is slavery, and ignorance is strength.

[-] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago

Your comment inspired me to create a post about it, thanks lmao

[-] atomicpoet@kbin.earth 17 points 4 days ago

State capitalism is still capitalism.

[-] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 4 days ago

Sounds like counterrevolutionary propaganda... i'd be careful not accidentally fall out of any windows if i were you.

[-] ulterno@programming.dev 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

"China is Socialist"

  • The Leading party literally named "Communist"

Not that any of them really mean anything

[-] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 days ago

Tbf they're used a lot as synonyms in marxism. Ultimately it's still a state capitalist hell hole

[-] ulterno@programming.dev 4 points 4 days ago

It ultimately depends upon the people.

  • Capitalist laws work well, with peoples' mentality being community oriented.
  • Communist laws work well with capital oriented mentality.
  • Nothing works when bandits are given all the power.
[-] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 days ago

You may be interested in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_socialism. I personally don't think capitalist laws help anyone but so long as you're a leftist that's fine by me.

[-] ulterno@programming.dev 4 points 4 days ago

I'm not *-ist. I don't do *-ism.
My thoughts don't depend upon what a certain group of people may/may not consider acceptable.

[-] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 days ago

Yeah labels are vague but they're good at getting a general idea of what you support. For example I don't label myself much generally, but i just say i'm a libertarian socialist or anarchist. It's what you believe that actually matters.

[-] ulterno@programming.dev 3 points 4 days ago

The problem with catchphrase labels is that it creates the same problems as the word "God" has for thousands of years.
It encourages people to think less and empowers those who would use this to destroy rationality in groups and use said groups to destroy people for their own agenda.

[-] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago

True, it's more important to focus on your own beliefs than subscribing to a single ideology.

[-] callmepk@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Nonono πŸ€“πŸ‘†

It's acktually Socialism with Chinese characteristicsπŸ€“πŸ‘†

But seriously it's just Dictatorship with Capitalism with a skin of Socialism

this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2025
61 points (100.0% liked)

The Democratic People'sβ„’ Republic of Tankiejerk

704 readers
99 users here now

Dunking on Tankies from a leftist, anti-capitalist perspective.

Rules:

  1. Be civil and no bigotry of any kind.
  2. No tankies or right-wingers. Liberals are allowed so long as they are aware of this
  3. No genocide denial

We allow posts about tankie behavior even off fedi, shitposts, and rational, leftist discussion. For a more general community !meanwhileongrad@sh.itjust.works is recommended.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS