181
(page 2) 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 41 points 20 hours ago

They were complaining that Biden was doing nothing for the situation.

What did they think Trump was going to do for them?

[-] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 11 points 17 hours ago

Well, he was the "Muslim ban" president, so it couldn't have been good.

But that ship has sailed. We have a malicious, greedy oligarch in control of the USA now.

[-] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 15 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

People always start taking the status quo for granted eventually. On one hand, Trump might actually end the Palestinian genocide. Just, not in the way they want.

[-] Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world 10 points 17 hours ago

Yeah he'll get the genocide finished as quickly as possible.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 72 points 22 hours ago

Go fuck yourselves. Almost everyone tried to tell you this was going to end badly.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 67 points 23 hours ago

God. Damn these people are so pants shittingly stupid.

They are going to be yelling about how no palestinian can be removed from their land even as they are being tossed onto a plane to El Salvador.

Stupid fuckers. All it's going to take is one u s soldier getting his boot scuffed, and they'll round them all up.

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 11 points 22 hours ago

They've been scuffing the boots of IDF soldiers for years and they're still going

But, hey, I'm sure the US is totally different, look at how easy and cheap it was for us to occupy Iraq /s

[-] CMLVI@lemmy.world 12 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Not to mention, Trump is a peacetime president. He's ending the Ukraine War and the Israel Palestine War ~~day 1~~ ~~week 1~~ ~~whenever convenient~~ committing US troops to Gaza to commandeer the land and redevlop it as a US territory, while also threatening to take over the Panama Canal, Greenland, and to annex Canada, and requesting Zelensky allow Putin to ravage Ukrainian land and likely install puppet govt while prosecuting any Ukrainian loyalists as the Russians see fit.

You know. Peaceful things.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 71 points 1 day ago

Secretary of State Marco Rubio wrote on X: "Gaza MUST BE FREE from Hamas. As @POTUS shared today, the United States stands ready to lead and Make Gaza Beautiful Again. Our pursuit is one of lasting peace in the region for all people."

Ahmad, the spokesperson for the Abandon Harris campaign and a Palestinian activist, also said: "Despite the entire world being against them, Palestinians have proven that they will be victorious. They are returning to their homes and living among the rubble—people like that cannot be defeated. That is not a matter of opinion; it is a fact."

The level of cope is just so hard here.

I bet this face must be extra tasty for the leopards.

[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Such a hateful comment. It’s not even about American voters. The quote you pull here is about human people living through unimaginable torment and loss and you call it “cope.”

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 13 points 16 hours ago

I know, it's absolutely hateful to say Arab American have to live with the consequences of their actions.

[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

you said cope. about ethnic displacement. like it’s internet beef or something. that’s what’s hateful. cope with me judging you for it.

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

It's not a problem too cope with you judging me, it's very, very easy, barely an inconvenience.

I simply don't care one whit about what you think about me. You have your opinion, I have mine and opinions are like assholes, we all have one.

And regardless of what our opinions are it won't change the fact that Arab Americans endorsed Trump, was a key factor in his victory, and he implemented a Muslim man in his first term and one of his first acts was to nominate and appoint cabinet members who have a history of anti-Muslim rhetoric, and just stated he wanted to turn Gaza into a parking lot with resorts and no Palestinians.

May you and I live in the interesting times we voted or sat out of voting for.

[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

And regardless of what our opinions are it won’t change the fact that Arab Americans endorsed Trump,

Ah there you go! You have a problem with some Arab Americans who endorsed Trump. I have a problem with them to!

But some is not all. The quote you cited is from a group who endorsed Jill Stein. If every Stein vote had been alocated to Harris the outcome would have been the same.

Looks like I have helped you successfully make your position less hateful. It turns out you were attacking the wrong group. This is progress. :) Best regards.

[-] blakenong@lemmings.world 16 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

These leopards are going to get diabetes with how they’ve been eating lately.

[-] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago

Lil Marco is such a pathetic bootlicking weenie.

[-] anindefinitearticle@sh.itjust.works 13 points 19 hours ago

Muslims were a key swing vote in key swing states like Michigan and Wisconsin.

More importantly, the dems might have actually won if they had taken this opportunity to show that they were capable of listening to and learning from their constituents.

Trump demonstrated that he could grow and adapt from his previous term while the dems insisted on dictating terms and asserting that everything was fine without room for criticism or growth.

Improve and grow.

Listen and adapt.

Do better.

[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 11 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

This is proven by the data. Every poll on the subject reflected the sentiment that, had Harris split from Biden on Israel-Gaza, more would vote Harris. This was known before the election. This data was ignored. People were screaming for their rights up to the last second. Many (not all) still voted Harris. And now they are getting screamed down for still having the gall to express their anger at humans being treated as animals. It feels hopeless. The white moderate liberal has no shame or empathy.

Thank you for commenting, friend.

All of the talk of civil rights being America's priority has fallen short in the face of our economic priorities and our proclivity to agitate for war.

We have designed a society where empathy is scarce. A society overworked and without the bandwidth for most to process how their actions impact people on the other side of the globe.

Sometimes you've gotta skip out on the bullshit to live life and learn for yourself. All of these increases in productivity, and yet we have less and less time to be human and stitch together our society.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 10 points 19 hours ago

To everyone calling them stupid. What exactly should they have done in this situation? What is the better solution when your only options are death or a faster death?

Im genuinely asking

[-] socialmedia@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago

Vote blue and send huge amounts of letters and phone calls to your Congress people telling them to stop supporting this. Run new candidates under the Democratic party that push them further left.

Sounds impossible? Yes. People were force fed propaganda and gave up this election, because its a hard choice. There is no easy route. Its either revolution or try to change a party to something better. There is no option 3.

People told the centrists, I told my friends for fucks sake. I know someone who stayed home saying their vote didn't matter and both sides are evil. I told them that is a vote for Trump.

They were right. Their vote didn't matter because trump won by a landslide in our state. But what if they, and thousands of their compatriots, weren't force fed propaganda on Facebook and TV?

The republicans won because of coordinated attacks that presented centrists with multiple trolley problems. I held out hope until the end, but I should have known what was going to happen when some reasonably intelligent people fell for it.

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 7 points 19 hours ago

The options appears to have been

Get bombed but afterwards the survivors get to stay in their homeland.

Or

Get bombed and afterwards the survivors are ethnically cleansed and their homeland becomes a US/Israel resort.

[-] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

So slow genocide with open air prison vs quicker genocide?

[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 16 points 19 hours ago

Surviving until another more friendly politician comes around is certainly a much better option.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

The best way to ensure a politician who supports a cause comes along is to support politicians unconditionally whether they support it or not.

And the people who think that genuinely think it's the rest of us who are stupid lmao

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 6 points 18 hours ago

Do you want the genocide that will take a century, or the genocide that will take a few weeks to months.

The lefts goal is to stop the genocide, in either scenario, but it seems like a much harder thing to do under the latter option.

[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 5 points 18 hours ago

they could have shut up and never expressed emotion or dissent at the deplorable level of dignity stripping they were subject to.

that’s the genuine answer. that’s what white liberals would have preferred.

and now they are getting shouted down by those liberals for still advocating for their own rights. many still even voted harris. it’s truly heartbreaking. america is so racist even the rise of fascism is blamed on brown people.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2025
181 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19776 readers
2453 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS