831
submitted 3 days ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/science@lemmy.world
(page 2) 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago

This must be all that government waste I've been hearing about...

[-] Shortstack@reddthat.com 24 points 3 days ago

I think the endgame is to tear down anything tax dollars have touched. Which, you know, is plausible since his entire platform could be simply summed up as a giant middle finger.

Expect them to attempt to torch more than our science databases

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

Truth always is the first victim.

[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

The GOP read the Bolshevik, CCP and Nazi playbooks.

[-] WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

How long until this evil administration forces some citizens to sew a yellow star or pink triangle on their clothes?

[-] Shortstack@reddthat.com 4 points 3 days ago

Yellow star is so last world war.

It’ll definitely be pink triangles and moon and star this go around

[-] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Are you fucking kidding me?!?! What the fuck is wrong with that orange fucking clown? Jesus fuckjng christ.

[-] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

Why not move all journals out of the US or move all research out of US journals. Who cares if for instance JAMA publishes nothing this year? Nearly 100% of the value was always in the scientists who write and review the work

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago

times 3.12.23 reporting bb dayorder doubleplussungood refs unpersons rewrite fullwise upsub antefiling

In Oldspeak, this might be rendered:

CDC orders mass retraction and revision of submitted research across all science and medicine journals. Banned terms must be scrubbed. (Including gender, transgender, pregnant person, LGBT, and more)

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago

I really hope some people are archiving stuff as fast as possible...

[-] Gork@lemm.ee 11 points 3 days ago

Is there an equivalent to samizdat in scientific journals?

If so, our scientists should adopt some pseudonyms...

[-] iamtherealwalrus@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago
[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

On review I agree, we need better sources before we can be confident of this story.

Edit: It seems to be real.

https://www.commondreams.org/news/trump-cdc

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
831 points (100.0% liked)

science

15592 readers
360 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS