403
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by JOMusic@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 172 points 2 months ago
[-] introvertcatto 34 points 2 months ago

Sigh... If I need to. unzips pants

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

There's a strong chance he'd enjoy it; so maybe it's best not to just to spite him. Lol

[-] ludicolo@lemmy.ml 142 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

In other news, shit spewing liar spews more shit and lies to get more of your money.

He thinks they're on the wrong side of history my ass. He doesn't care. He never cared. He will never care. The open source you and I know is completely different than the "open source" this chucklefuck is probably selling you on. "We need to figure out a different open source strategy" should be the biggest indicator here. Take everything he and his circlejerk says with the biggest fucking mountain of salt you can dream of and double it.

[-] JOMusic@lemmy.ml 39 points 2 months ago

Yeah totally agree. He has proven to be one of the slimiest people on the scene. I mean, he is pretty much throwing his colleagues under the bus in this statement too lol

[-] Octagon9561@lemmy.ml 81 points 2 months ago

Unless they open source their models, they should be forced to rename to ClosedAI. It's literally false advertising otherwise.

[-] serenissi@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago
[-] randomwords@midwest.social 4 points 2 months ago

OpenVMS, now there's a name I've not heard in a long time, a long time...

[-] dave@feddit.uk 2 points 2 months ago

I think my uncle knew it. He said it was dead.

[-] rimu@piefed.social 54 points 2 months ago

It grinds my gears that someone who can't be fucked with capitalization has that much money and power. I get that using the shift key occasionally is an inconvenience but we do it to help the readers. A conversation is give and take.

[-] SnotFlickerman 26 points 2 months ago

Like all techbros it is an affectation to cultivate a certain sort of appearance. A type of mad faux intellectualism.

You literally have to be a tryhard to do all lowecase on a phone, for example.

[-] HatchetHaro@pawb.social 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

i've disabled auto caps on my phone :o

i generally type in all lower case because it appears more casual, at least to me. it's not exactly a rule i follow, so it's never consistent, and i don't mind capitalizing abbreviations and names and such anyways.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] princessnorah 10 points 2 months ago

i disabled auto-capitalisation a decade ago on my phone and that change has persisted ever since, but yeah guess i'm a tryhard. yeesh, being a grammar "nazi" was uncool even back then on reddit, imagine still being hard up about it in 2025.

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

i am on a phone. i did not press any extra keys to make my phone not do caps - this is because i have changed my phone to this, because when you write about technical things, capitalisation is important - lower case everything is lower case everything. i’m not about to start hitting an extra key at random times when this is perfectly fine. i’ve never had an issue reading all lower case

it’s not try-hard; it’s practical for people who work with tech

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Don't you find capitalisation help to define sentences? It's much easier to read, particularly at speed.

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

personally, no i don’t. perhaps it’s because i skim a lot of code and im just used to it? i’m not sure, but honest truth i find capitals mostly redundant. perhaps useful to add context (names, acronyms, etc)… i add them for uncommon acronyms, but common things that people know i tend to skip too

you can say it’s lazy, and i’ll absolutely take that: it’s totally lazy… but there’s no weird effort or external image decision involved in it?

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's just an extra convention to help communication. But I don't buy your lazy argument because:-

  • it is often performed automatically

and

  • you take the time and effort to enhance your communications with punctuation and paragraphs.
[-] hedgehog@ttrpg.network 2 points 2 months ago

Both of the reasons you’ve provided are nonsensical:

  • It isn’t performed automatically if you disable it, and they did (and explained why)
  • They said they don’t believe capitalization aids with clarity. They didn’t express the same opinion about punctuation and paragraph breaks.
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] shiftymccool@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago

Who says he's on a phone?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ObsidianZed@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

Man... I initially read that as

can't be fucked with capitalism

and I was thoroughly confused.

[-] skeesx@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago

This is the Reason why Germans are angry all the Time.

[-] PanArab@lemm.ee 46 points 2 months ago

It is okay we are good. Already more than ~~3500~~ 9900 have forked DeepSeek.

Wild that it almost tripled in the 48 hours since I last checked.

https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3/forks

[-] uis@lemm.ee 29 points 2 months ago

Lol. They didn't even publish weights since GPT2. And weights are not enough for open source.

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 18 points 2 months ago

Can someone ELI5? He's admitting it was never truly open? Or they were wrong for thinking open was good at all?

[-] JOMusic@lemmy.ml 49 points 2 months ago

OpenAI was started to be as open as possible, and to prevent the kinds of capitalism-driven Closed-AI development that they have now themselves become.

My personal opinion is that closed AI systems are only good if the owners are trustworthy. And in the long-run, no single owner can be trusted. There are risks with letting everyone copy and customize AI, however the worse danger is that the power gets too centralized with one single company.

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 52 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

OpenAI was started to be as open as possible, and to prevent the kinds of capitalism-driven Closed-AI development that they have now themselves become.

No, that was what OpenAI said its goals originally were. They were lying. They always intended for it to become a capitalist venture. Anyone who listens to Tech Won’t Save Us or This Machine Kills or Team Human have known all along. Or anyone like me who’s been in the industry for thirty years.

[-] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 12 points 2 months ago

I too have been in the industry for many a decade and I heartily concur. I do have many colleagues though that also have been in for many years, and those are still dedicated believers. Maybe their critical thinking has been eaten away by all the lead in soldering tin?

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago

That reminds me, I was temporarily blinded once from breathing in too much soldering fume.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

Can confirm, lead feasted.

[-] JOMusic@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

Ah interesting - cheers for sharing!

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 3 points 2 months ago

It's really disappointing as a huge fan of sci-fi myself. I know we won't get flying cars and stuff anytime soon, but technology in general is super cool. Humans are really ingenious.

And these corporate troglodytes had to go and ruin a good thing. I hope their balls explode.

[-] zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

He's saying they're wrong for not currently being open.

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

No, he said they "need to figure out a different open source strategy". That is completely different.

[-] dumnezero@piefed.social 2 points 2 months ago
[-] Suoko@feddit.it 11 points 2 months ago

We have plenty of alternatives like Mistral, Gemini, qwen, deepseek...

But none of them is fully open source that you know data they've been trained with, right? Maybe only K2 ?

[-] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 months ago

I'm not sure what kind of admission that is other than they aren't on top anymore.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Irelephant@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago
[-] xpsking@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Lol, lmao even

[-] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 months ago

Well, if openai open sources all their models, what value is there left that is unique to openai? Training data? But that is only valuable if they invent a better way to make it into an "AI".

[-] Carl@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Most companies that have open source products make their money in providing support for it to other companies, so theoretically OpenAI could do that (in fact top level AI developers are pretty rare so they could charge way more than other companies do for consulting) but that wouldn't be a hundreds-of-billions-of-dollars business plan because it's much too sensible.

[-] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 4 points 2 months ago

Hosting a model of that size requires ~800GB of VRAM. Even if they release their models, it wouldn't make them obsolete since most people and many companies couldn't host it either way.

[-] rcbrk@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Anyone can now provide that service. Why pay OpenAI when you can pay a different service who is cheaper or provides a service more aligned with your needs or ethics or legal requirements?

[-] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 1 points 2 months ago

Anyone that has 300.000$ per instance, the know-how to set it up, the means to support it and can outbid OpenAI, yes.

I don't see that happening on a large scale, just like I don't see tons of DeepSeek instances being hosted cheaper than the original any time soon.

If they really are afraid of that they can always license it in a way that forbids reselling.

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 2 months ago

OpenAI started as a non-profit, so it could be 100% open and still be truthful to it's original intentions.

[-] JOMusic@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2025
403 points (100.0% liked)

Open Source

35650 readers
253 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS