93
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] grue@lemmy.world 68 points 1 day ago

Translation: taxpayer funded religious indoctrination, nationwide.

[-] Joeffect@lemmy.world 63 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

More broadly, it directs the Department of Education to prioritize school choice programs through its discretionary grant programs, and orders the Department of Health and Human Services to issue guidance on how states receiving block grants for families and children can use those funds to support private and faith-based institutions. >

So basically public schools are bad? Why should the public pay for private schooling?

[-] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago

It's both a money grab so rich bastards can feed on government money, and a way to segregate schools.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 day ago

Also a way to shovel money to religious groups while defunding secular education.

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 13 points 1 day ago

And take money away from education for poor people!

[-] Cyv_ 9 points 1 day ago

Segregate and control the lessons. A public school probably can't teach the US is a Christian nation or that being gay is evil, but a religious private school...

[-] Xatolos@reddthat.com 5 points 1 day ago

It's less that and more public schools are already under funded, and this will just make them even more under funded, possibly leading to closures and consolidation of public schools. All of this will make public schools worse and private (mostly religious/Christian) look like a better and better option for your children.

Public schools are funded by an amount set by the government, but private schools are funded by what the school demands. This allows private schools to be better funded because they'll demand that the money per student is higher, and when it's the tax payer that is paying it, more and more parents won't notice or care about price anymore (since it isn't coming from their pocket) and will pick the better funded school and hope to deal with the consequences (of indoctrination) later (if they know about it at all until too late).

This is something that the Republicans would like since religious schools typically tell students that Republicans (aka God fearing people) are good and Democratic (aka not God fearing) are bad and real Christians always vote for the Republican party. Indoctrination from the start. And the Republicans get to wash their hands of any negative claims because "it's not a government school" so free speech and all that. Don't like it? Go to the worse and horribly under funded public schools instead.

[-] iopq@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It depends, is your priority education or public education? That's what the debate is about

[-] Zier@fedia.io 16 points 1 day ago

Christianity is a hate cult, your children will be indoctrinated!

[-] twistypencil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago
[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Trump: Directs the Department of Education to prioritize school choice programs through its discretionary grant programs

Also Trump: Signs executive order freezing all federal grants

Looks like it corrected itself.

[-] LostWon@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Well he did say he loves the poorly educated...

this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
93 points (100.0% liked)

News

24232 readers
3523 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS