Yeah, but $200,000 for Trump feels like a joke. It should be more in line with his income to be meaningful.
Well, judging by his tax returns his income isn't much to brag about.
Dude has millions of runes donating to his campaign/defense fund now. Campaign finance was already a corrupt joke in this country, but he's taken it to a new level.
Sure, but all his money goes to his lawyers. Or maybe not. Only one I know who's actually gotten paid by Trump is Stormy Daniels.
We aren't even sure those are real as well. It's why NY was prosecuting him for tax fraud.
To be honest it probably is just he continues to spew his is a billionaire so it should be a billion dollars see what happens. 200k is a joke.
I hope he doesn't. He'll bury himself into a mountain of new trouble. But even he is not that stupid.
Or maybe he'll flee to Russia. Which is fine for me too, let him expose himself as a traitor and eliminate the possibility of holding office again.
CIA and USSS would never let him flee to russia.
They wouldn't stop him. More than Half of them would probably help him do what he wants to do
They weren't able to stop Snowden. Trump has resources, if anyone in his proximity has half a brain he might have a shot.
Are you seriously comparing the asset value of Snowden to that of trump?
I'm curious what makes you think he's not that stupid.
His ego is greater than his stupidity. Fleeing will be an admission of losing - that would break him mentally
Careful he might be the first president working remotely. From russia.
I don't think we're up to the Russian vacation yet, not until we get closer to sentencing.
Does it feel like the news is all opinion pieces these days? All I see is "someone said something on Twitter" lately.
This is the politics community, not news, so opinion pieces are fair game.
But yeah, even so, I hate how even "news" articles are "elon posted something on twitter".
I suspect it's a function of engagement. Trump's edictments are hot, so some will click on anything vaguely related to it. Even reporting on chirping does the trick since people want more of the "story" even though it's not a development.
The steep decline in money available to publishers means that they’re going to cut reporting in favor of paying an intern to copy and paste off of twitter. You end up with twenty different publications summarizing the same AP article with one paragraph, the. a dozen hot takes on twitter by people you’ve never heard of.
And we’re reaching the point where they don’t even need the intern to do it.
What? You don’t want to hear about the latest thing Elon Musk said/did on/with Twitter?
"Some words"
- A Dude
Lock. Him. Up.
Trump still has his passport. He is flying out to Saudi Arabia or israel where the US can't touch him.
You might need to update your list of countries outside of the US' sphere of influence - those are both close allies. :)
Yes and no
Close allies? Yes
Able and willing to tell the US to fuck off if they feel like it? Also yes.
Both also have a lot of power/sway over the US.
Sure - but I doubt they'd use that to protect trump's sorry ass. :)
Yeah, they're not going to protect a fleeing fugitive who isn't useful to them anymore.
Man is going to Russia for sure.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The $200,000 bond approved for Donald Trump in the Georgia election interference case is significant as it suggests the former president "cannot be trusted" to surrender to authorities for processing, according to a legal expert.
Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee approved the amount for the former president on Monday, the first time Trump has been asked to post bond in any of the four criminal cases he is involved in.
Discussing the bond arrangement, former Deputy Assistant Attorney General Harry Litman said that while the amount of money is not an issue for the former president, it is noteworthy that Judge McAfee should take steps to ensure that Trump does hand himself in.
But the bigger provision is the anti tampering condition—he can't do anything to intimidate any co-deft or witness or otherwise obstruct the administration of justice," Litman posted on X, formerly Twitter.
The former president is not allowed to communicate with witnesses or any of the 18 other co-defendants in the case, which includes his former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows and his ex-personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, except through his lawyers.
Trump was previously accused of witness intimidation via his Truth Social posts by legal experts after suggesting that former Georgia Lieutenant Governor Geoff Duncan shouldn't testify to a grand jury just prior to the Fulton County indictment being announced.
The original article contains 596 words, the summary contains 226 words. Saved 62%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Isn’t that the entire point of pre-trial detention?
When's he going to do something that allows the cops to just shoot him?
We got a runner…
He will just to be a martyr and bask in it.
Plus the mug shot will be plastered all over his campaign as a badge of pride and people will buy tons of merch with it.
Premise of the article is flawed. They're setting bond amounts for everyone. Seems like standard procedure in Fulton County, GA.
I mean, I kinda hope for a Dog - Trump Showdown
Dog probably voted for Trump and would help him escape.
Unless his politics have changed substantially since the last time I thought about Dog.
Interesting example on the importance of proper N- and M-dash usage
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News