79
submitted 13 hours ago by john89@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.ca
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] lurch@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 hours ago

so that's where they draw the line. a lot further right then where i draw it, but at least they have one

[-] john89@lemmy.ca 3 points 13 hours ago

As much as I hate musk, this is the exact kind of censorship that is causing communities that don't support mod abuse to have an advantage.

Fuck deciding what other people can and cannot see.

Viva la federation!

[-] Zorque@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

No one's saying they can't see something.

They can go to X themselves if they want to see it. They just won't be able to do it from those subreddits.

this is the exact kind of censorship that is causing communities that don’t support mod abuse to have an advantage

I honestly can't tell if this is a defense of mod abuse or not.

[-] john89@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago

Reddit mods are literally saying users on their subreddit can't see twitter links posted there.

[-] Zorque@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

I'm sure they also say that people can't see child porn or doxx links either.

Does your absolutist approach to "free speech" cover those as well?

[-] john89@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago

No.

I can tell you're upset about this and not thinking rationally, so I'm just going to block you.

Goodbye.

[-] CMLVI@lemmy.world 17 points 12 hours ago

It's not even just about the salute. Using Twitter links, especially in the sports subreddits, has been a pain point for years and years. Unless you have an account, you can't see what was said. If you do have an account, you can't see the original tweet in response. When highlights are posted, the video player is trash. There is always a karma race to post the info first. Updated information has to become a new thread because you can't edit the old tweet. Deleted tweets lead to dead threads. The experience has been shitty for years, this is just the last push it took to try to break out. ESPN has started making it's analysts info and breaking stories available on their platform through some kind of system on ESPN? I got notifications about it on Tuesday. So the functionality isn't really being lost; information is still coming out as normal, it just isn't from a shitty platform (completely separate from current events).

[-] john89@lemmy.ca 1 points 12 hours ago

All fantastic reasons to discourage posting twitter links, but I stand by my assertion that this kind of censorship is not a good thing.

[-] Zorque@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

"I agree with your argument, but I'm going to be contrarian anyways cause fuck it"

[-] john89@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago

Not really.

It'd be more accurate to say you guys are clamoring to fit in.

[-] Zorque@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago
[-] john89@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

You guys, you people, etc. The people getting mad at me because I dared to stand up for free speech when it's something unpopular being said.

I lump them all into one big group because they're incapable of autonomous thought, just like you.

Enjoy your block, btw.

[-] CMLVI@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

I wouldn't call that censorship. No spread of information is being restricted anymore so than what Twitter already restricts. Unless you are connected to your Twitter account already, it cannot be seen. The information can and is readily found elsewhere. Is restricting of linking to a platform (who itself is restrictive in who can see the information) censorship alone, ignoring the content?

[-] john89@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago

No, it's textbook censorship.

Just because it's censoring something you want censored doesn't mean it's not censorship.

It's sad this has to be spelled out for so many of you, but I really don't expect more considering the world you're growing up in.

[-] CMLVI@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

How is defederating not censorship? The solution is to make your own instance and control your own federated instances, but that's partly unrealistic for everyone to run their own instances. So Fediverse inherently promotes censorship? But the same solution exists with Reddit. It's not an administrator rule, it's a sub rule. If you don't like the rule, you can make a sub and allow the links, the exact same as the solution for federating your chosen interests. It just seems hypocritical to shout "viva la fediverse" when the exact same issue is here, and it's technically one of the built in features.

Also, that's insane the level of personal attacks you're levying because I disagree, but go off my guy. Crazy you're not posting from your own instance, lest something get defederated and censored. But what do I know? The world I am growing up in (as an adult like...2x over) clearly doesn't show it.

[-] john89@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 minutes ago

🥱

Just gonna ignore you now, goodbye.

[-] heavydust@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 hours ago

Twitter prevents me from reading the posts half the time, and I can't see any comment at all, so...

this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
79 points (100.0% liked)

News

65 readers
100 users here now

Anything related to the news. We will not abuse our mod power to censor you like the other news communities.

founded 1 month ago