1066
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

Hundreds of subreddits are debating banning links to X.com (formerly Twitter) following Elon Musk’s Nazi salute at a Trump rally.

Dozens of subreddit moderators have already implemented bans, while others are holding votes among their communities.

The bans span political, regional, and topical subreddits, including r/NewJersey, r/londonOntario, and r/christianity, with some highlighting Musk’s gesture alongside neo-Nazi imagery.

This move reflects growing backlash against Musk and his platform over perceived alignment with extremist symbolism.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Vipsu@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago

Honestly the fact how bad user experience X is for unregistered users should be reason enough to ban links to X.

[-] estranho@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

The experience for unregistered users on Reddit is almost as bad as twitter, I don't think Reddit cares about that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 62 points 1 year ago

What a coincidence, I've been banning all links to reddit. This is working out great.

[-] StayDoomed@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

Maybe they will leave oligarch owned social media next.

I mean I doubt it. After all, the next-best thing is Lemmy.

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago

Are any Lemmy instances banning x links? I haven't heard of it, but would be in favor of it.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

We're currently conducting a vote on dbzer0 for it via a pinned post.

Last I checked the count was overwhelmingly for banning links to X.

[-] Psythik@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

LMAO well said. It sucks that we really don't have a decent alternative to reddit. I miss my niche subs.

Digg should have never released V4. It was reddit's only competition, but now it's a soulless, corporate curated media platform. You can't even comment anymore.

[-] chetradley@lemm.ee 29 points 1 year ago

We're spending so much media attention on this Nazi salute that I'm wondering if it may have been the intent all along - tie up media coverage while the Trump administration pushes harmful legislation through under the radar.

[-] chaogomu@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

The thing is, Trump's harmful policies are in fact Nazi policies. We need to be spending more attention on the fact that there are now Nazis in the White House.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] VerifiedSource@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 year ago

Boycotting Twitter is a good idea for many reasons. However this kind of blanket link ban will lead to more informational segregation quickly. This has already happened in many ways since the beginning of the war on Ukraine. Linking to Telegram or any Russian website is no longer allowed in many forums, e. g. Reddit. That has made finding original sources and verifying information much more difficult.

Take links to videos for example. Reddit is full of videos copied from YouTube, Telegram, TikTok, etc. without attributing the original source. The World Wide Web was supposed to link information together into a network, where you can follow up on origins snd details. Nowadays it has turned into a series of copy & paste silos, enabling the most extreme echo chambers.

[-] HolidayGreed@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think segregation is the long term plan.

Divide and conquer.

Knowledge is power; Wikipedia is next on the hit list.

[-] VerifiedSource@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

I doubt there’s a plan behind this.

Social media wasn’t the primary driver behind the Arab spring. The economic issues were the trigger. People couldn’t afford to buy food. Lack of food will topple any government. Media control only gets one so far.

On the Internet the dominant websites can change quickly. Being banned from Twitter enabled Trump‘s Truth Social. Buying Twitter gave Elon Musk a giant soap box. However new soapboxes are constructed all the time and some succeed.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] wildcardology@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

And they'll eventually not do it considering they are still debating about it. Just do it.

[-] hasnt_seen_goonies@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Some have already banned, some are in the process of voting.

[-] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago

So that's what it takes before people think of leaving twitter.

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

They have concepts of leaving, but addiction is a bitch. Most will stay.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] gencha@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

Garbage blocking garbage. Fuck Reddit

[-] rabber@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

11 year old account banned for saying that if there was a revolution the rich wouldn't have the resources to protect themselves

No previous infractions

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] blazeknave@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've banned new Teslas from going before me at stop signs, passing me on the freeway, and not being cut off by me within inches in the left lane at any opportunity I can take.

Edit: was really expecting greater than zero downvotes for the last sentence. Thanks for letting me talk shit and knowing I'm not trying to endanger any safety for real

[-] falcunculus@jlai.lu 4 points 1 year ago

I choose to believe this is brilliant trolling

[-] Souroak@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 year ago

I can't believe it's taken this long. I get disappointed when microblogmeme jpegs don't have 2 @ symbols in them.

[-] JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I wish I could stop using WhatsApp but that's where all the people without phone plans are. I wish I could stop using Telegram but that's where all the drug dealers are. I wish Reddit would ban X links, but that's where all the sassy hot takes are.

[-] lurklurk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You can of course, you're just chosing to support zuck, musk and durov because it's slightly inconvenient for you not to

Of those three, telegram isn't as bad though. They're insecure and share data with law enforcement etc, but they're not as active and enthusiastic collaborators with Trump

[-] JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

My point is the network effect. That's where people are and I have no power to change that, so that is where I must sometimes be. If it was up to me, things would be wonderful and open source. But I sometimes have to deal with — ugh... humans.

[-] lurklurk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It is up to you though. I get that you can make the choice that supporting zuck and musk is an OK price to pay to not have to do a little more work or be the annoying person saying "I only have Signal" but it is very much your choice. You could choose differently, if your priorities were different

[-] JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

India alone is about 2 billion people who all use WhatsApp. I cannot change the world. I hear you and would love for us all to switch to federated or — at least — decentralized things, or whatever. I will advocate for it, but like banks and shit are using WhatsApp. It is legitimized here even more than MMS. I can't stop it. And yes, I have made the choice to communicate with humans rather than using Signal.

[-] lenuup@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

I did that for a while. The thing that happened was that I got left out of stuff, because people didn't always think of informing me separately, when it was already discussed in the already existing groups. Sometimes they would inform me after all the planning was done what the plans were, sometimes I got a last minute info or no info at all. So the choice was between a significant loss in my social life and using the same service as everyone else in my social circles.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] bokherif@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Lemmy should do the same.

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

eh, spez is probably going to step in and force them back to require Twitter or something. he wouldn't want to be pushed out of the oligarchy.

fuck spez in advance

[-] Eggyhead@lemmings.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don’t like the guy either way, but I still can’t believe this is actually real. Are there any videos that show unequivocally that this is a salute and not just a meme made out of a poorly timed photo? All I’ve seen so far are just still shots, which leads me to suspect there’s a spin on this.

Edit: I should also add I avoid X as much as possible anyway.

[-] Veedem@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

That’s just laziness on your part. It’s VERY easy to find video clips of the two times he did it.

[-] regdog@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Paywalled link

[-] Redditsux@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Just ban it!

[-] dx1@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ban links to reddit please. Fucking cesspool. Ban the self-righteous know-it-all users too.

[-] Dragon@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Are there other sites to which links are banned? I don't really like that policy for anything no matter how nefarious. Unless it's malware or a liability and going to land the visitor in prison.

[-] VerifiedSource@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Links to Russian websites and telegram are banned on most of not all subreddits.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Porn sites without strict CSAM, malicious injection or spam protection, many individual subs ban extreme right-wing sites, Fox News or opposite left-etc

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ef9357@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
1066 points (100.0% liked)

News

37060 readers
2416 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS