411
(page 3) 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] nomy@lemmy.zip 61 points 1 day ago

Wow, holy fuck, I never thought it'd happen. Even a broken clock is right twice a day I guess.

This dude is about to have a very lucrative career.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] then_three_more@lemmy.world 23 points 23 hours ago

Could someone explain like to an non American why the president gets to pardon people at all?

If someone committed a crime they're guilty, if there's new evidence that they're not guilty then that's what appeals are for.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 15 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

My best understanding is that it was a historic right of kings, governors, etc. The idea was to show mercy to those who may have been convicted wrongly, or to people convicted of laws that have been overturned.

Trump is abusing it in ways never done before to payback political supporters.

TBF Biden abused it as well in pardoning his son.

[-] then_three_more@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago

Sounds like a rule that very much should have been left in the 17th century

[-] owl@infosec.pub 2 points 22 hours ago

Wasn't there a situation where he did not pardon his son?

[-] YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

Same situation, he just waited until later in his presidency

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] sudneo@lemm.ee 8 points 22 hours ago

Just FYI this is not just an American thing. In Italy for example the President of the republic can cancel or amend sentences too, and it does happen relatively often, although not in the same partisan way as in the US (but that's also because the president in Italy is a neutral and representative position).

Some example from few years ago when the president graced 33 people (each with a specific articulated motivation) https://www.ilpost.it/2021/12/10/mattarella-grazia-sette-persone-sebastian-oberleteir-heinrich/ (in Italian, but you can translate if you wish).

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 day ago

Don't know or care about this guy but all drugs should be legal.

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 10 points 23 hours ago

Then you should probably care about him. He gave people around the world access to medicine that was illegal

[-] Glasgow@lemmy.ml 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Silk Road wasn’t the first darknet market ya know. I helped launch the first couple that were .onion prior to Ross, but the movement has been about since the 90s at least and would’ve happened without any of us. We were working on a decentralised version that would've been unstoppable but people moved on and got other priorities when SR took all the media attention and spotlight. I'm guessing it'll emerge out crypto soon now the tech has caught up with the theory.

[-] prole 3 points 15 hours ago

I'm kind of curious to hear about this decentralized solution...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 day ago
[-] MunkysUnkEnz0@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

Probably made a deal and wants all his Bitcoin. Smart kid, you know it's hidden somewhere. Thank God he's out there double life without parole. It's inhumane.

Not to mention that undercover basically set him up to look bad.

[-] LengAwaits@lemmy.world 11 points 20 hours ago

If he didn't wanna look bad he shouldn't have sent a person he believed to be a hitman $300,000 to murder someone.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] owl@infosec.pub 3 points 22 hours ago

How was he set up to look bad?

[-] paraphrand@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

People can watch his wallets right? And they suspect/know what ones they are? And this is something people are hotly following now?

I should look this up. It’s fascinating if we can just watch it happen, on the chain.

[-] prole 1 points 15 hours ago

Can't watch Monero. Which is what he should have been using instead of Bitcoin.

[-] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Yeah, he really should have set that up before he went to prison, you know, before Monero existed, lol.

[-] prole 1 points 12 hours ago

Ok. But Bitcoin didn't suddenly become transparent the moment Monero was created.

[-] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Uh...okay then?

[-] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 28 points 1 day ago

Because of bitcoin I'm sure.

[-] MunkysUnkEnz0@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Yeah, you know the kids smart enough to have some hidden like thousands of them or something crazy and made a deal.

It's not out of the kindness of his heart.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Anyone else remember the panic when you logged in and saw the notice that the site was seized by the feds?

I mean, certainly not something I experienced but I’m sure if I had it would’ve been terrifying to think the feds could find your info

[-] oldfart@lemm.ee 1 points 21 hours ago

All sellers had pgp keys published, everyone just used these and feds could not see shit.

Not like the later honeypots where the market published fake pgp keys on sellers' profiles and MITMed the communications.

[-] prole 1 points 15 hours ago

Not like the later honeypots where the market published fake pgp keys on sellers' profiles and MITMed the communications.

Goddamn.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

the market published fake pgp keys on sellers’ profiles and MITMed the communications.

Daaaaamn

[-] oldfart@lemm.ee 2 points 15 hours ago

Okay i remembered it wrong, not PGP keys but close

GIaFw1sXQAAQVhM

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Wow, thats crazy.

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 6 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Imagine having millions of dollars worth of bitcoin in 2013 and then being imprisoned until 2024.

I hope he made a good backup of at least a few thousand coins.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] x00z@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago
[-] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Why though?

I mean, who is looking at this and calling it an injustice?

Side note: does he get his bitcoin wallet back?

[-] iopq@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

He got more time than actual gang bangers without committing any violent crime. His sentence was way longer than it should have been.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 4 points 23 hours ago

The US already auctioned off his coins. But its possible that maybe he had some more on a backup somewhere

[-] CitricBase@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

Side note: does he get his bitcoin wallet back?

Dude was deep into Bitcoin back when it was less than a dollar. If he diversified and stashed just a fraction of his holdings, he might now be one of the richest people on the planet.

Who says crime doesn't pay? :/

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 23 hours ago

To buy votes

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
411 points (100.0% liked)

News

23981 readers
3824 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS