121

Summary

A 19-year-old man was arrested for allegedly setting fire to U.S. Rep. Glenn Grothman’s office in Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, citing anger over the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision upholding a TikTok ban.

The suspect admitted to the arson, which caused no injuries as the building was unoccupied.

The ban, upheld due to national security concerns about TikTok’s parent company ByteDance, has sparked significant public reactions.

Grothman had supported legislation to ban TikTok earlier in 2024.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 18 hours ago

A lot of people don't seem to realize that a lot of small businesses and sole proprietors rely on tictok to generate business. For most people it's just a stupid video app but for tens of thousands of americans, their livelihood just got ripped out from under them. I think those people have a right to be pissed.

[-] piecat@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

You got any credible sources on that?

[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago

You want a citation that the e-commerce industry exist? And that they've been protesting since all this started?

[-] aggelalex@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

Bread and circuses, people

[-] ech@lemm.ee 40 points 1 day ago

If this shit causes more actual unrest than anything else from the last decade, I'm gonna fucking flip out. People are so fucking stupid.

[-] socsa@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago

They may take our lives.

But they will never take our brain rot.

[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I think people with publicly searchable addresses shouldn't try to actively fuck over large swaths of people in one go. We should all act with integrity anyway, but boy when you're public, it's a really good idea to put in a little more effort on that front.

[-] ech@lemm.ee 17 points 1 day ago

"Fuck over". Lol, it's a shitty video app, mate. Get some perspective.

[-] Care_anew@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

I'm pretty new here but this seems like a Lemmy bubble take from what I've seen so far. An L take at that. Just because you were told it's just a silly dance app, doesn't make it true. The flow of information there is wild and it serves as a great source of 1st account world news and a great place for small and start up businesses to gain footing in the market. You are being overly reductive and I can't figure out WHERE the vitriol is coming from.

[-] ech@lemm.ee 3 points 16 hours ago

You're making a lot of assumptions and accusations given my reply was barely two sentences. "Vitriolic". I'm not the one freaking out about a single app taking itself down for 12 hours, setting fire to offices, or jumping to an arsonist's defense. Maybe work on figuring out where that response is coming from, instead, and why you think it's more ok then what I said.

[-] Care_anew@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

Where, in the fuck, did I defend the arsonist in my response? Your response however, did say that banning an app isn't fucking over thousands and also called it a "silly dance app". So again, vitriolic and reductive by calling it a silly dance app and concluding that OP should be the one to gain perspective, when you are only looking through your own.

I stand by what I said, and again, this sentiment seems rampant on Lemmy. Which is why I said this is a bubble. See? No assumptions, just reading comprehension.

Hope this helps 👌

[-] ech@lemm.ee 2 points 16 hours ago

Lol. Making shit up to be mad about.

Where...did I defend the arsonist

You didn't. And I didn't say you did.

Your response however, did say [it's] a “silly dance app”

You keep trying to put words in my mouth. I said "shitty video app". Admittedly course, but hardly "vitriolic" compared to setting someone's workplace on fire. I ask again why you think that's seemingly so much less offensive to you than my three word critique.

this sentiment seems rampant on Lemmy. Which is why I said this is a bubble.

Not what a bubble is.

See? ~~No~~ assumptions, just [no] reading comprehension.

ftfy

[-] Care_anew@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

Ah yes, I did mess that up, "shitty video app", sorry. The conglomerate of Lemmy is all starting to sound the same 🤣. Now, I would still say is a vitriol response to people losing their right to assemble and freedom of speech, along with many people's form of income. It's at the very least callous and lacks empathy.

As for the arsonist portion: "jumping to an arsonist's defense" - You 🥴 Also notice how you mentioned it again, in the next follow up. That's called rhetoric and your intention is clear. Cool? Cool.

A bubble is where a singular set of viewpoints are dominant and reinforced by the in-group while any outside perspectives are removed or written off with some in-group jargon. I would say this community fits that quite well actually.

[-] ech@lemm.ee 3 points 15 hours ago

See? ~~No~~ assumptions, just [no] reading comprehension.

[-] Care_anew@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Neat. Great response. No notes, you've made my point.

[-] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

I get the sentiment but there's people that actually make their living on this platform. So for someone shouting at someone else to get some perspective maybe you want to curtail your messaging.

this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
121 points (100.0% liked)

News

23916 readers
3014 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS