102

Summary

Katherine Stewart’s book, Money, Lies and God: Inside the Movement to Destroy American Democracy, warns of a coordinated right-wing movement aiming to dismantle U.S. democracy.

This movement, comprising Christian nationalists, billionaire oligarchs, and conservative ideologues, aims to dismantle pluralistic democracy and establish a theocratic system.

Stewart highlights its deep organization, financial backing, and strategic voter mobilization, contrasting it with less coordinated pro-democracy efforts.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The only difference between these folks and the Taliban are what type of hat they wear.

[-] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I fear fundamentalist Christians the most because you can’t spot them in a crowd by a funny hat and beard like other fundamentalists.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Though, as a beard haver I'm pretty happy I'm not confused with these asshats due to my appearance.

[-] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago

Yea, loads of us saw this coming from almost a decade ago. Wtf can be done now?

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

The only hope I have is really bleak. And it’s that the Christian fanatics underestimate how little the billionaires actually care and will ultimately decide theocracy is bad for business and the ending of There Will Be Blood happens in real life. We’d still be in a cyberpunk dystopia but at least we wouldn’t be put down for not attending church

[-] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

The only reason I still think they will inevitably fail (although not without a heavy cost to the public) is because of how many different factions there are. Currently they are united by a common hate of liberalism, but if they manage to defeat it they will inevitably turn on each other.

No matter how I slice this I strongly feel that all roads leads to a civil war and a fracturing of the federation.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

As I was watching the future of xtian belief (waning, and fast) and the changing of demographics (not as white), I kind of expected the reactionary elements in this country to act like a cornered animal.

These people hate everything about the American experiment. They hate normal Americans having the freedom to tell their little book club to shove it and to mind their own business. I'm sure the stats that show nearly 1 out of 3 Americans are "nones" (and growing) and that the numbers of xtians keeps falling (ironically, I bet immigration is what keeps it even propped up to the 60-some percent it is at now)

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Theocracy, christian fascism and fascism in general are very very very far away from nihilism.

The hegemonic narrative doesn't even try to understand opposing ideologies, just misrepresent them.

[-] yesman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The term "reactionary nihilism" is an oxymoron.

The popular definition of nihilism is a bad person who rejects my values. Or a bad person who secretly holds values in opposition to their public persona. "Nihilist" in journalistic circles means "double-atheist", to their readers it just means "wicked".

its going to be frustrating to people familiar with the philosophy, but it was way too cool of a word to stay esoteric and academic. The solution is to find a new word for the philosophy; accept the loss of the word to popular culture. (which is a good and natural process)

[-] mriguy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

“Say what you will about National Socialism, Dude. At least it’s an ethos. “

this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
102 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19634 readers
2453 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS