719
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 245 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)
  • Transporting the grain from the field to the mill.
  • Milling
  • Transporting flour (and at least 3 other ingredients) from the mill to the bakery
  • Baking, packaging
  • Transporting the bread from the bakery to the supermarket
  • Running the supermarket.

Turns out there is a difference between raw wheat and bread. More news at 8.

When farmers get paid too little for their effort, making these wild comparisons isn’t helping. It seems we’re about a year away from the conclusion “I stubbed my toe. This must be capitalism’s fault.”

What did you stub your toe on? Under which economic system was that object produced? Open your eyes, sheeple!

[-] ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk 23 points 4 days ago

Don’t understand how he can be part of this industry and not understand it at all.

Or he does understand and is playing a victim. Second is more likely.

[-] golli@lemm.ee 13 points 3 days ago

The second one for sure. But i would also argue that Clarkson himself is only part of the industry to some degree, because primarily he is still in the (quite successful) business of producing television. And while he is certainly learning stuff the actual act of running a farm is still primarily done by others.

On the practical farming side by Kaleb and on the business side by Charlie, who in this case would be the one understanding how the economics between 25p/kg weat and 1.25£ for a loaf of bread work.

[-] ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk 8 points 3 days ago

I think you’ve got a valid point there. I would also say Clarkson is very “me me me”.

[-] BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 days ago

Yeah, this is the guy who successfully played victim when he got fired for punching someone in the face. He knows exactly what he's doing.

[-] ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk 7 points 3 days ago

Yup. I remember it well.

Did you see the interview during the farmers protest where he got upset that the interviewer pointed out he’d only bought the farm to dodge IHT?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] quixotic120@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago

It’s actually kind of crazy all of the rest of that happens for £1.25

Now if we do insulin in the USA, it won’t make so much sense. Capitalism!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)

I fully expect Jeremy Clarkson to have never baked a loaf of bread in his life.

I'll occasionally bake a loaf of bread, here in my home kitchen. I can't do it with only wheat flour, I need water, salt, sugar and oil as well. So I have to pay my municipal waterworks, a salt miner, a sugar beet farmer, a rapeseed farmer, a wheat farmer, and whatever you call a yeast maker, plus their adjacent industries (I don't by sugar beets, I buy refined granular sugar, etc) and multiple truck and train drivers who move all of those goods in their various states of manufacture around the continent.

Then I've got to bake it, I have an electric oven so now the local energy concern gets their cut. It's that, or get a gas oven and cook with natural gas (fossil fuel methane), or misuse my backyard grill and cook with fossil fuel propane, or get out my axe, fell a tree and build a fire, which is labor intensive on my part.

Sometimes, watching Jeremy's Farm, there's an amount of "I didn't think it would take this much knowledge or skill." Because jackasses like me with 40 square feet of vegetable garden and some packets of seeds from the home center manage to make food. How hard can it be to scale that up to hundreds of acres? Modern farmers need a bachelor's degree, you need to know about plants and animals and soil and all manner of shit to be a farmer. "Put seeds in ground, plants grow." Yes, but actually no.

Sometimes it's "He's still The Orangutan from Top Gear." He buys a tractor that's way too big and then struggles to drive it, lol.

A lot of times it's "I don't think rich TV man actually understands how society works, people have just done shit for him his entire life."

[-] AnarchoSnowPlow@midwest.social 11 points 3 days ago

You don't have your own yeastmonger? Shame. Only way to go really.

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

that sounds like a d-tier supervillain

[-] Frostbeard@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

His show is entertainment, so he has this character who is semi- incompetent in everything. Yeah, he has this personality also, but not 100%. And some of what he does is just idiotic. The tractor is just him I'm that role.

But the show highlights a lot of important aspects. The skill of farming, the sheer amount of effort, the risk and how much you get for all that risk and effort.

For me it's a missed opportunity that the farmers didn't integrate the chain up like many stores have done down. That is buy the mills, bakeries and stores. Why can the grocery chains so it, but not the other way around?

[-] digdilem@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 days ago

Exactly. What he never ever does is underplay what real farmers do. He's also using this platform to speak for them, and British farmers are largely supportive of his efforts in shining lights on problems they face every day.

But some people online hate the guy and have made their mind up before even bothering to read or try and understand.

[-] Tangentism@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

His show is entertainment, so he has this character who is semi- incompetent in everything. Yeah, he has this personality also, but not 100%. And some of what he does is just idiotic.

The thing about playing a bafoon-ish, semi-incompetent character that uses racist encoded jokes, promoting a lifestyle of the bored rich elite is that at some point you have to come off stage and out of character.

When Clarkson comes off stage, he punches people in the face because he didn't get his din-dins or writes opinion pieces with racist encoded jokes and illiberal positions.

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Most white loaf bread recipes start with "dissolve sugar into warm water, add yeast, allow to proof until thick and foamy."

[-] LazerFX@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago

Most American white loaf bread recipes...

Even in the UK, we would call most American bread "fortified dough", like a sweet/pudding, not bread. I bake occasionally and it's flour, water, salt and yeast.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah that's what I do as an American. Sometimes some spices go in if I'm feeling fancy

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] digdilem@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yeast needs sugar to eat in order to fart out carbon dioxide and make bread less dense.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

So I have to pay my municipal waterworks, a salt miner, a sugar beet farmer, a rapeseed farmer, a wheat farmer, and whatever you call a yeast maker, plus their adjacent industries (I don’t by sugar beets, I buy refined granular sugar, etc) and multiple truck and train drivers who move all of those goods in their various states of manufacture around the continent.

The good news is that, thanks to economies of scale, all of these consumer goods are incredibly cheap by unit weight.

The bad news is the we've privatized so much of the agricultural infrastructure and stuck so many middle men in between you and the raw labor that produce these useful goods, that the margins on cost are enormous.

How hard can it be to scale that up to hundreds of acres? Modern farmers need a bachelor’s degree, you need to know about plants and animals and soil and all manner of shit to be a farmer. “Put seeds in ground, plants grow.” Yes, but actually no.

The beauty of industrial farming isn't in simplicity but yield. Nitrogen fixed fertilizer and modern irrigation and combine harvester mean a handful of professionals can do the work of thousands of amateurs.

But if you don't actually know what you're doing, or employ someone who does, all that investment is wasted.

[-] filtoid@lemmy.ml 23 points 3 days ago

This is the same Jeremy Clarkson who thinks that young people should work the fields, paid for with taxes, as part of a National Service scheme, right?

What a bell end!

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

"As an old guy who increased large sums of money in an agricultural tax dodge strategy, I demand younger people subsidize my costs so I can pocket bigger profits. "

Clarkson is a twat. Always has been. But at least when he was younger he was an entertaining, relatable twat. Now he's old, richer than sin, and entitled as fuck.

[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 days ago

I think it's the same Clarkson who bought a farm to avoid inheritance tax?

[-] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 51 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

According to Past Clarkson, if Current Clarkson can't make good money farming then Current Clarkson shouldn't be a farmer. Simple as that.

And that is because Current Clarkson is the worst farmer ... in the world.

[-] hobovision@lemm.ee 6 points 3 days ago
[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 32 points 3 days ago

I'm not a farmer, I'm not a baker, I'm just a bread eater, but even I knew that 1kg was way too much wheat for a single loaf of bread. Turns out, yup. 1kg makes 2 loaves.

How does that change things? Well it means a loaf of bread contains 12.5p of flour, not 25p. So, instead of a loaf from a grocery store being about 5x as much as the price of the flour it contains, it's 10x as much.

Having said that, This isn't just a "capitalism" thing. There are many steps between the farmer selling raw wheat and a loaf of bread appearing on a store shelf. Many of them are unchanged since ancient times. I'm sure baker in the Middle Ages charged enough for his loaves of bread that he'd make a reasonable profit and that was centuries before capitalism was a thing.

In the modern world there are different facilities for every step. There's transportation which costs something at multiple stages. There's winnowing and milling the flour. There's buying and shipping the other ingredients. There's mixing the dough. There's baking the dough. There's packaging (and possibly slicing) the bread. And finally, there's the grocery store. To be useful, a grocery store basically has to be in a built-up area, which means high real-estate and related costs. It also needs to make enough margin to pay people to stock the shelves and cashiers to sell the loaves. The only truly modern part from all that that didn't exist in the Middle Ages is sales and marketing. Paying to send out emails or a flyer or whatever to advertise their items. My guess is that most of those steps operate on razor thin margins and make up for it by doing huge quantities.

Now, it's true that the system has flaws and inefficiencies. One glaring example is the lack of competition at many stages in many countries. In Canada, there are so few grocery store chains that the existing ones were able to literally fix the price of bread. So, of course when that happens both customers and farmers get squeezed.

I wonder if there ever was a "golden age of farming" when farming was a comfortable lifestyle. It seems to me that it has always been a very difficult career. If anything, it's probably at its best now under "capitalism". That isn't to say it's an easy job now, just that as difficult and stressful as it is now, it was even worse in the past.

It would be interesting though, just as an intellectual exercise, to imagine a perfectly fair world to figure out what the perfectly fair ratio is between the price of wheat and the price of a loaf of bread on the store shelf. If everybody were paid the exact same rate for their labour, and there were no excess profits generated that went to owners / landlords, how much of the final price of a loaf of bread on a store shelf should come from the raw ingredients of wheat, water, yeast, oil? How much goes to the baker? How much to the delivery drivers? How much to the shelf stockers and cashiers? Imagine it's a wood-fired oven, how much of the price of a loaf of bread goes to a lumberjack, even though their involvement in the whole process is really indirect?

[-] atlas@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

1kg of wheat ≠ 1kg of flour

load more comments (1 replies)

Yeah, "capitalism" is when a the private equity firm buys the farm and now instead of producing enough to live on, or even just "as much as they did last year, now they must show year over year profits.. Every year.. Forever

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

Nah, private equity doesn't care about profits every year forever. They want to squeeze the remaining juice out of something then throw it away. Something that's sustainably generating profits year after year is a pipe dream compared to what private equity does.

For them, it would be something like have the farm sell its land to an affiliated entity, so the farmer now owes rent on the land in addition to the other expenses. Take the money from selling the land and invest in farming a crop that's completely unsustainable but profitable in the very short term. Say something that needs so much water that the water table quickly drops and the wells no longer work after a few years, or something requiring massive amounts of expensive fertilizer. While that's going on, fire all the farm workers who do any kind of maintenance or planning work. It doesn't matter if the pumps stop getting maintenance, if the tractors are never serviced, if bills are paid on time. It doesn't even matter if mold starts creeping in or vermin start moving in, as long as it doesn't happen immediately. Arrange for the farm to pay the PE owners a management consulting fee that's so high that after paying rent and 100% essential costs, there's absolutely no money left. Eventually, when the farm collapses, declare bankruptcy and let all the creditors fight over the remains.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 34 points 3 days ago

He’s not the sharpest egg in the attic, is he?

[-] digdilem@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 days ago

Lemmy shitposter learns about protest.

[-] BurnedDonutHole@ani.social 35 points 4 days ago

This dumbass was happy that government was paying him not to do anything with his land for that show he had called Clarkson's Farm or something. I wonder when it started to hurt him so he started to pay attention...

[-] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 38 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

In the show, he started farming as a little side project during the pandemic. But he realised how much it sucked and how hard it was for people for which it is the sole source of income.

He's tried to help his neighbours with the shops and restaurants. I don't know how much of it is propaganda or not, but it seems genuine given his recent public statements about it.

If a stubborn bastard like Clarkson can change his mind about stuff like that, it's always good.

[-] BurnedDonutHole@ani.social 11 points 4 days ago

I didn't say anything bad about his recent statements. I've yet to see anything real and tangible from his alleged efforts. While he was happy to accept such grants of doing nothing with joy. To me he is nothing but a TV personality and nothing about him is genuine. He literally did a Trump move on his latest interview where he asked the TV reporter what percentage is paying inheritance tax and she said 4% and he run with 96% of the people is having difficulties and shit. And when the same reporter asked where he get his numbers he asked his lackeys who is not effected? He is in my eyes nothing but an attention seeking bastard. Because he is talking loud but doing nothing real.

[-] Kushan@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago

The real and tangible thing from his efforts is the slow itself. Regardless of his motives or wherever or not you like the guy, his show has actually raised a lot of awareness of how much farmers have struggled in the UK. He makes it very clear that the only reason he can afford to run the farm at all is because of the money from the show and he doesn't know how other farmers are surviving - which in many cases they aren't.

However he is also banging on about inheritance tax, which has nothing to do with whether real farmers can make ends meet and everything to do with rich, tax-dodge farmers like himself.

[-] Kushan@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

It's entirely possible to disagree with him on one thing he says while agree with him on others.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] xwolpertinger@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago

This is the man who punched somebody in the face when service workers went home and he was huuuungy

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 25 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Lol, not discovers, just uses it a way that at this moment might serve him to further his own agenda.

It's just a business that has one "influencer" already on staff.

[-] ElcaineVolta@kbin.melroy.org 16 points 3 days ago

I've not watched anything this person has been in, but every time I see him sharing his thoughts and opinions in publication he seems like a genuinely incurious, blathering moron.

He’s also a racist and assaults people over sandwiches

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Now imagine him shouting "SPEED!" and "POWER!" a bunch and being totally stubborn and you've got about 90% of his TV work

[-] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 18 points 4 days ago

He must have farted and the air bubble allowed him to get a glimpse of the outside world.

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago
[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

He looks better under acceleration

[-] CaptKoala@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago

Your wording there needs work.

Jeremy Clarkson looks at his best under POWER!

load more comments (1 replies)

Jeremy Clarkson is a racist, abusive piece of shit

[-] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 days ago

Clarkson is going to Waitrose to get fancy bread. Aldi sell it for 45p. 25p to the farmer leaves just 20p which is split between transport, processing and what ever profit Aldi are taking out of it.

[-] Emperor@feddit.uk 16 points 3 days ago

Clarkson not knowing the price of bread is one hardly a surprise.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
719 points (100.0% liked)

okmatewanker

743 readers
208 users here now

No foul language - i.e. French 🤮

Obviously satire, dozy wankers

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS