361
rule (lemm.ee)
submitted 6 months ago by Irelephant@lemm.ee to c/196@lemmy.world
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 67 points 6 months ago

The average populace let's me down, every time.

[-] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 44 points 6 months ago

Hey Google, what does "populace" mean?

[-] Please_Do_Not@lemm.ee 36 points 6 months ago

"Think of how dumb the average person is. Then realize half of em are dumber than that." -George Washington Carver

[-] Forester@pawb.social 23 points 6 months ago

"It's called the American dream because you have to be asleep to believe it." -Martin Luther King

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago
[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 2 points 6 months ago

good ol' Muphry's Law (sort of).

[-] formergijoe@lemmy.world 45 points 6 months ago

Whenever these hot trends show up, you're only seeing when it hits peak popularity. You need a comparison to see how it is permeating society. Unsurprisingly, it appears very few people are searching for this compared to the general population.

[-] kn33@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

It changes if you switch "what is an oligarchy" to just "oligarchy"

[-] formergijoe@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Woah! That makes me feel a little better. I just used "what is an oligarchy" since OP did.

Edit: It's weird that as both "oligarchy" terms trend downward "hawk tuah" starts trending up.

[-] Gingerlegs@lemmy.world 28 points 6 months ago

People waited until January?

[-] Hotspur@lemmy.ml 44 points 6 months ago

It’s because Biden just said oligarchy in a speech.

[-] crank0271@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

The media, amongst everyone else

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 6 points 6 months ago

the media, and thus everyone else

[-] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 27 points 6 months ago

Its really obnoxious that Google doesn't provide any units at all for the vertical axis

I think someone said they used to

[-] Baguette@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago

They provide one on the left (0, 25, 50, 75, 100)

What those units mean I have no clue, but I'm guessing 100 means 100% and is the highest amount of views, which they then base the rest on (5% of the highest recorded views, etc)

[-] gratux 7 points 6 months ago

This is exactly how the scaling works, and why it's pretty useless without another search to compare it to

[-] Irelephant@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

no, it means 100 people searched it.

[-] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

That's just an ol' wives tale man, no way

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

Yes this makes me sad. What makes me mad is that Biden and the Democrats waited until he's GTFOing to bring it up politically.

[-] taiyang@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

Don't be too Lemmy bubbled, we talk alot about it here for us to know it but I think it's an advanced enough word for people with only a high school education not to know.

I'm more impressed that people in the South tuned into the speech.

[-] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

People with a 5th grade reading level*

[-] taiyang@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

I wanted to see if you're referring a vocabulary list or just being a snob so I looked it up. If you go by grade, that word generally isn't covered until a student gets a social studies class, usually in high school.

That's not to mention any adult English learners out there where this wouldn't exactly be a priority word.

[-] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 months ago

Oklahoma, of fucking course 🤦

[-] Saleh@feddit.org 6 points 6 months ago

Seriously people, stop falling for this statistical misrepresentation/misinformation nonsense. If the interest in a term peaked, does not mean that any significant number of people looked it up. I have compared the term with NBA and Cats to get two generic comparisions:

The percentages in the lower part show how often the term was looked up relatively speaking. So NBA was usually looked for 30-40 times as much and cats was looked for 15-20 times as much.

So compared to all searches, we are talking about maybe something in the range of one in a few hundred thousands to maybe on in a few thousand searches.

[-] Pika@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I'm not sure what's being misrepresented, it's obvious that its in comparison to itself and nothing else

[-] Saleh@feddit.org 2 points 6 months ago

It is represented as as relevant event. But if normally 5 people google it on an average day and then 50 people googled it, it is still completely irrelevant.

By not providing how many people in total have looked up the term, this information is meaningless, but people upvote it because they want to believe that is is a relevant amount of people who looked it up, because it makes them feel right or whatever.

You also find this in the comments in this thread where people argue whether "oligarchy" is a term that is generally known or requires higher education.

We also saw some "news articles" based on just looking at how the relative change of a terms searches was, suggesting this is in any way meaningful despite the reasons it is not without further context.

[-] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

So basically "peak == relative to the history of that specific term"? That seems obvious to me and not sure how someone could interpret it differently. Nothing I seem implies that number of searches for "oligarchy" is higher than any other searches for other words.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

The states that didn’t know, and the states that don’t want to know or don’t care.

this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
361 points (100.0% liked)

196

5378 readers
471 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

Also, when sharing art (comics etc.) please credit the creators.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS