440
I hope they survive, such bravery
Sarcasm?
The ruling class will face no harm, they're all in the same club. They might tut tut and waggle their fingers but then they'll retire to their gated communities.
That’ll show him!
dEcOrUm
Trump could think this is a tragedy which calls for flying flags at half-staff
Half-mast*
/s
Trump didn't attend Biden's inauguration, why should Biden feel he has to attend Trump's? (I know this is about the lunch, but still). Obama and the Clintons should take a pass too. They think they have to go to somehow prove something like they're not petty or that the country isn't really falling apart or whatever, but all they're proving is that they're A-OK with the rise of fascism in the US. God I wish they'd show some spine just this once.
Liberals have always chosen fascism over any kind of leftism. They would rather a Nazi than a socialist
That'll show him!
The fight against fascism begins.
Not with guns, or knives, or even pens, but with neglected big macs drying out on a chafing dish.
I'm sure they're grown-ups and can get their own McDonald's.
I still think about how cold all that is whenever I see this photo
Some of the best athletes in the US ... being fed cold ~~McDonald's~~ Wendy's
Whoa whoa, that looks like Wendy's... Let's not fuck around here man. Can't pass that up
I can't stand Wendy's. It's consistently bad every time I've eaten it.
https://www.wendys.com/blog/when-the-easy-answer-isnt-the-right-one
Now you can feel better about it
I guess Obama saw people's reaction to him joking around with him like old pals during Carter's funeral.
Did you expect Obama (of all people) to be unkind at another man's (let alone a former president's) funeral?
wish, not expect. what i expected him to do was order another drone strike on brown children. you know for old times' sake
Order a drone strike at or during a former president's funeral? I'm not following what you're talking about. Are we on the same topic?
No.
It's a big club and you aren't in it
I'm sure they can go to McDonald's on their own
Neither is Henry Kissinger, first time he's ever missed one
He lived entirely too long.
load more comments
(1 replies)
i will also not be attending his inaugural lunch. i bet that will show him
However, all three former presidents and their spouses, except Michelle Obama, will attend Trump's swearing-in ceremony.
Couldn't pass up the more prestigious event that's going to be watched by the entire world.
In comparison, passing up a work lunch with a bunch of congresspeople that probably won't even be televized doesn't sound like taking much of a stand against the fascist takeover..
It was going to be McDonalds anyway.
load more comments
(6 replies)
Our base is devastated to learn that we see the people stripping them of rights and money as good friends and colleagues, what do we do?
Release a story where two of the past Democrat Presidents won't attend a celebratory lunch with the guy who we're handing unimaginable power to!
Wait, they actually invited Obama and Clinton but not Bush? What?
It makes sense, when you consider their roles in the Conservative Cinematic Universe. Obama and the Clintons are the heels, the side that is meant to lose the pro wrestling match, the one which his audience boos. He wants them there in his moment of triumph so he can (metaphorically, thank god) teabag them to thunderous applause.
Bush is meant to be on his side, though, since Trump is meant to own the loyalty of the entire party. Since Bush did not immediately do so, he is actually worse. At least the Clintons are playing their assigned role. Bush is a traitor to the Party, which means he is a traitor to Trump personally, so Bush needs to be pushed to the margins. (Let's hope that's the extent of it.)
You know. I can actually imagine Trump sees the whole thing like a WWE match.
Conservatives hate Bush. He was supposed to be their "First Trump" an idiot trust fund baby that'll do everything they say. They wanted to fully occupy most of the middle east but Bush Sr told Jr no.
He was Cheney’s puppet though. It’s interesting how decades later, on left leaning social tech platforms like Lemmy and Reddit (maybe earlier Reddit) how history seems to have recorded him (to some anyway) as the good Republican. As the nice guy. The guy you want to have a beer with.
The "beer with" thing was part of his election campaign rhetoric. That was part of the Republican war on intelligence.
load more comments
(1 replies)
He could've said something during the election. He chose not to.
Maybe they forgot that there were two Bushes and only remember the one that died.
load more comments
(1 replies)
The inaugural lunch, a tradition since 1897, typically includes speeches and toasts for the new administration.
Anyone have a sense of how rare it is for living ex presidents to dodge it? Feels pretty rare but I don't know.
Former Secretary of State and first lady Hillary Clinton also received an invitation to the inaugural luncheon but will not attend, according to a third source familiar with the matter.
I kinda feel like she missed an opportunity there.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I guess this is their idea of fighting fascism? Thanks dickheads.
They were never in the business of fighting fascism. Just look at the dictatorships they supported.
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
440 points (100.0% liked)
News
23860 readers
3055 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS