221
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

TikTok faces a U.S. shutdown by Jan. 19 unless the Supreme Court delays or blocks a law requiring its Chinese parent, ByteDance, to divest.

The Biden administration defends the law as a national security measure, citing potential risks of Chinese government influence. Content creators argue it violates free speech.

Donald Trump, once a supporter of the ban, seeks a delay to reach a "political resolution."

A shutdown could cost TikTok millions of users and revenue. The court’s decision, due soon, could reshape U.S. digital speech policy.

all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Good. They're an espionage company masquerading as social media. They're a cancer.

[-] emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 6 days ago

What is facebook? Instagram? Google? Twitter? I dont use any of those if i can help it, nor TikTok. But supporting the ban of one of them while allowing the others free reign just because they're owned in the US is insane. Their CEOs don't have anyone's best interests in mind except their own, as has been proven time and time again.

[-] tiefling 2 points 6 days ago

Do Meta and Xitter next

[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 90 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Stricter laws restricting data collection would actually solve the problem but that will hurt the American propaganda machine just as much. China will diffuse it's propaganda through our own social media like they clearly already do. They can literally buy the data from our own data brokers, it won't even stop them from being effective.

[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 week ago

"It's to protect our citizens from China!"

"Are we going to have stronger data protection laws across all 50 states and the federal government to help protect our citizens?"

"That sounds like a terrorist wanting privacy to hide form Facebook and Google's data to the NSA!"

[-] EldritchFeminity 11 points 1 week ago

Yeah, Chinese leadership was complaining about the mass migration from Twitter to Bluesky because it rendered their bit accounts useless, so it's not like it's a secret or anything.

This has always been about how TikTok can't be bought out as a propaganda machine by American billionaires.

[-] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 76 points 1 week ago
[-] ech@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago

Dunno why the last bit was removed. Ruins the wordplay that would apply perfectly here.

[-] SoupBrick@yiffit.net 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This article from 2024 gives a pretty good rundown as to why using this reasoning to ban Tiktok will set a very bad precedent:

https://www.npr.org/2024/05/14/1251086753/tiktok-ban-first-amendment-lawsuit-free-speech-project-texas

If the govt cared about your data privacy, they would create data collection regulations that they could then use to ban tiktok if/when they violate them.

[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

Tell that to the Leopards Eating My Face voters here advocating for censorship and government overreach.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago
[-] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

Why is everything so glacially slow anymore. Fucking do something! I've been hearing about the demise of TiKTok for like three YEARS. Die already. Or don't, I'm just sick of hearing about how it "might close" any fucking day now.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 10 points 1 week ago

The 19th is the legal deadline.

replace "data" with "ads/propaganda/right-wing content".

Sorry about the bad quality, i've resent this picture so many times now that there's barely any pixels left.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago
[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The best possible outcome would have been a digital bill of rights that applies to all social media. Please step outside the Amazon box youre thinking out of.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

No no I said possible outcome.

[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

People really cheering this? I don't like TikTok because I don't much care for that style of short form video - but let's not act like it would be better under US tech giant control. Worse, I'd say.

Officials say Chinese authorities can compel ByteDance to hand over information on TikTok's U.S. patrons

Oooooh scaaaaary. I'd feel much safer having it under the control of a government who actually affects my life. 🙄

Red scare 2.0 bullshit

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

I am conditioned to be revolted by autoplay videos. Even here, when I opened this post on the mobile web version, a video autoplayed at the top and I immediately stopped it.

[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Facebook first.

[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Don't threaten us with a good time, TikTok!

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago

Excellent! Please do. You would be doing the world a favor.

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 week ago
[-] MetalMachine@feddit.nl 12 points 1 week ago

Just remember this is was because of so much pro palestine posts on TikTok.

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 6 points 1 week ago

The push to close TikTok happened before the Palestinian genocide.

[-] MetalMachine@feddit.nl 4 points 1 week ago

You're absolutely right. But the palestine issue pushed it over the edge. I forgot who exactly from the israeli camp but they said "we lost a whole generation"

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago

It's gonna happen on the 19th because otherwise TikTok could just pay Donald Trump to make it go away.

[-] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Is there anything stopping them from just renaming the company and rebranding it to avoid this? I could care less if it goes away or not, but I am curious how easily it could be to just rename yourself or if that's actually covered somehow in this. Even still, I feel like there will definitely be loopholes that they can do to skate around it?

[-] EldritchFeminity 7 points 1 week ago

All they need to do is literally sell the American branch to a US company - even one they set up themselves.

The reason that they won't do this is because a US founded company has to play by different rules than a Chinese company can.

Great, I can smell the undeserved court injunction getting ready to spew forth from the Supreme Court. The type no regular US citizen would ever get for actual violations of the 1st amendment.

[-] recreationalcatheter@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

Good.

Fit society or be ousted.

this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
221 points (100.0% liked)

News

23860 readers
2768 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS