158

Summary

Republican support for House Speaker Mike Johnson’s re-election is faltering ahead of a vote this week, with key figures like Rep. Chip Roy undecided despite Donald Trump’s endorsement.

Roy and others cite concerns over Johnson’s handling of past legislative battles, including a contentious budget fight.

With a slim GOP majority, Johnson cannot afford defections, but dissent persists among Republicans like Andy Harris and Andy Biggs.

Roy has suggested alternatives, including Byron Donalds and Jim Jordan, as doubts grow about Johnson’s ability to deliver on the party’s agenda in the new Congress.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] noxypaws@pawb.social 71 points 3 days ago

It'd be hilarious if they can't pick a speaker for months on end

[-] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 40 points 3 days ago

I hope Johnson gets the boot before they're supposed to certify the election. It's gonna delay the soggy carrot at least a couple of month.

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago

If Johnson gets the boot it will give him more time to date his adopted son.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago
[-] gsfraley@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Isn't the debt ceiling limit about to snap again?

[-] noxypaws@pawb.social 10 points 3 days ago

when the hell hasn't it been?

[-] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Watch them elect musk as speaker lmfao, there no requirement to be a member of the house.

[-] halfatank@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Please no. Don"t make US more sad and even more of a joke..

[-] knova@infosec.pub 10 points 2 days ago

it’s too late, this country is cooked

[-] makyo@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Nah I don’t think he really wants to work that hard

Lol, he's gonna designate someone to be temporary speaker to do the every day tasks.

[-] 7112@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Serious questions: If Trump and Vance die/leave would that make Musk president if he was speaker? Is that even allowed since he's not a native citizen? Would they just skip him and go next in line?

[-] lemmydripzdotz456@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago

IIRC, if someone in the line of succession is ineligible (underage, non-native citizen, already been president for too many years, etc), then they are skipped over.

[-] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Insurrectionists are also ineligible, but that hasn’t mattered so I wont hold my breath for the courts to uphold other conditions.

[-] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Legally no, musk would not in the line of sucession if he were speaker.

But then again, the constitution only says a natural born citizen is required to be president, it never explicitly required the same for acting presidents. Speaker of the House never actually become president, only act as president. So there is a possibility the Supreme Court could rule that Acting Presidents don't need to be a natural born citizen. I mean that'd be crazy, but crazy things like Jan 6, and a Felon becoming president already happened so... 🤷‍♂️

[-] ElectricTrombone@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago
[-] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

They already had the ideas. They just needed all the pieces in place.

If it wasn't so absolutely terrifying, it would be hilarious to watch every possible legal, judicial, procedural, constitutional, and legislative loophole be used in varying combinations to bypass each of the above.

Oh, so we can have Speaker Arnold Schwarzenegger as Acting President? Cool. I mean, I don't agree with every of his policies, be he'd be an honorable person to act as president.

[-] swab148@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

I'm not sure we want the Demolition Man timeline

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

You know, it's very possible that the GOP's perpetual inability to elect a speaker could be the best thing for this country for the next two years.

[-] Sixtyforce@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago

Like I give a shit which goblin does the job at this point.

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago
this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2024
158 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19271 readers
1551 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS