321

bitterfruit (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by merde@sh.itjust.works to c/oglaf@midwest.social

NSFW 13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

ℹ️

top 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] dandelion 48 points 10 months ago

it's so meta that this post isn't marked NSFW

[-] merde@sh.itjust.works 25 points 10 months ago

i thought people would get it, but now that i'm marking it nsfw—upon request—it's as sad as that pathetic god in the strip

damn you prudish people, i hope you never see real tits for the rest of your lives!

[-] m_f@midwest.social 8 points 10 months ago

Yeah, I'm kind of divided on this, but figured I'd err on the side of caution, especially if people are complaining. There's lots of small hills I'm willing to die on, but not this one.

The tits here are NSFW because they're not an oil painting IMO, there's lots of similar stuff posted to Lemmy without a NSFW flag because it's art so it gets a pass, like these:

https://lemmy.world/post/16175194

https://lemm.ee/post/51070002

Regardless, I appreciate you updating it, even if it seems a little silly.

[-] dandelion 5 points 10 months ago

that lactation oil painting is straight pornography, lol

[-] dandelion 6 points 10 months ago

[-] lime@feddit.nu 4 points 10 months ago

may all the breasts you see henceforth have male nipples prophylactically photoshopped onto them

[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Wait hear me out, I can't care for boobs any less since I'm more into Bobs if you catch my drift, but I do use Jerboa at work occasionally and I'd rather not be flashing people inadvertently and give off the wrong impression. So in my case it's not prudishness but social norms. Lol So I usually bookmark the blurry images and open them later.

For this image I wouldn't have cared because they're so small, though. But I do wish that people were more open about nudity in general.