1103
submitted 1 week ago by minyaen@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.world

Suck it micro USB, mini USB, and lightning! 🪫🔋

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 101 points 6 days ago

Now for those swappable batteries

[-] Cyber@feddit.uk 38 points 6 days ago

Including cars.

Drive in, swap non-proprietary batteries with an autoloader, drive out. Done.

[-] jabjoe@feddit.uk 19 points 6 days ago

Yes and no. No need to hot swap massive EV batteries. Rapid is fast enough. But yes so the EV can be upgraded. The batteries go obsolete quicker than they degrade. So make it so we can swap the batteries and keep the rest running. In fact, just right-to-repair the whole car. In fact, the whole everything!

[-] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 5 days ago

In fact, just right-to-repair the whole car. In fact, the whole everything!

Boy, that escalated quickly

But yes, please.

[-] DrownedRats@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Hot Swapping batteries is actually surprisingly good for the life of the battery if done well.

Rapid charging the battery does do permenant damage over time especially if you fast charge every time. Whereas if you can hot swap a battery and have a suitable stockpile of them you can trickle charge the battery over a couple of hours instead of 30 mins and prolong the overall lifespan of the battery. Even slowing down the charge rate to 1 hour reduces wear on the battery significantly. Plus, without time pressure from a customer, more time could be taken to replace damaged cells or blocks in a battery so that one pack will more effectively use the whole battery up instead of throwing away perfectly good cells.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 15 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

That is something that I wish would come true. This would also open EVs to the industry in some new ways. Currently it kinda sucks if you have machines that have to be able to run the whole day without big interruptions. When you're able to just swap the batteries in like 5 Minutes this machines don't have to rely on fossil fuels that much and are open to be replaced by electric ones.

What I'm thinking about are machines like tractors for farming. During the summer it happens that they are running for 8+ hours without interruptions. Building a battery this big will be quite challengening. However, if you're able to swap out the batteries after like 2 hours and then continue with work you effectively solved one of the biggest problems with not that much of a hassle.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 9 points 6 days ago

This sounds great until you've had to repair an old car.

Everything rusts, warps, etc. The same things that make it hard to change your brakes will make it hard to change the battery pack, and you're expecting a robot to do it for you (and fast!).

There were companies built on this idea. I think they've all gone under at this point.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

One of the benefits of EVs is we can get rid of a lot of infrastructure. Everywhere already has electrical so home and destination chargers are a minor add on and it’s only superchargers that are new infrastructure. Meanwhile the entire gasoline and oil refining, distribution, and tens of thousands of gas stations can just go away, along with their associated pollution.

Swappable batteries may sound cool but they’re less edficient plus now we have to build up a huge new set of infrastructure agai, we have to standardize batteries, and we can’t build them into structural parts. The only real advantage is speed but that’s not much advantage if you need to drive somewhere. I’ve never had to charge more than 25 minutes at a supercharger, so swapping a battery is only convenient if it’s at most ten minutes more away. Then you’re also assuming there will be more more battery and charger advances, such as those solid state batteries that a couple vendors claim are already in production, such as 800v charging that a few vehicles already can do, such as the latest Superchsrgers that can charge faster than any car can accept so far, or the semi chargers that have a few built out.

Long before you could build out a huge new infrastructure for seappable batteries and standardize cars around it, we’ll already have charging improvements that will make seappables irrelevant. You could argue they already are irrelevant in some areas

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

While 25 mins doesn't sound terrible you have to consider throughput. Long lines, waiting for chargers could become an issue if adoption takes off, and if I ever drove by a set of chargers that was full up and more people waiting that'd probably put me off from buying one.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] tht@social.pwned.page 28 points 6 days ago

That's actually the next goal

[-] Fishamatician@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

And make all power tool batteries compatible.

[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 40 points 6 days ago

USA checking in.

Just bought a new USB-C charging beard trimmer on clearance.

Feels good, man.

Thamks if EU helped.

[-] ad_on_is@lemm.ee 43 points 1 week ago

Can we bring back the charging as well, and not just the USB cable... Oh, and while you're at it, screws instead of glue, to replace batteries would be awesome.

Thx!

[-] RacerX@lemm.ee 45 points 6 days ago

There's a rule coming into effect in 2027 that enforces user replaceable batteries for devices in the EU. https://www.pcmag.com/news/eu-smartphones-must-have-user-replaceable-batteries-by-2027

[-] ad_on_is@lemm.ee 18 points 6 days ago

while 2027 is better than nothing, I still wonder why it took them so long. Glue in smartphones has been around for probably a decade now.

Also, I think, anything that has a battery, should be user replacable... even teeny-tiny earbuds.

[-] ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk 14 points 6 days ago

To allow the manufacturers to adapt and phase out?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] RacerX@lemm.ee 7 points 6 days ago

Totally agree! It's seemingly gotten worse recently too. My phone is 5 years old and I was still able to replace the battery at home but it took special tools and a hair dryer. The newest Pixels and Galaxy phones look impossible to do with my current skillset.

Things like Fairphone and the HMD Skyline should be the norm going forward.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] tht@social.pwned.page 7 points 6 days ago

Based AF eu

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] pyre@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

no keep the glue please. I love that my phone's back just came off on its own just because it was hot outside and the glue melted away. it was fun and exciting!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] PetteriSkaffari@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Just get a Fairphone, with every module screwed into place. Except the battery, you can just take that out by hand.

[-] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 14 points 6 days ago

That's true, but if the EU could force every phone maker to make the battery replaceable by the customer this would be a huuuuuuge step in the right direction and reduce electronic waste.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 32 points 6 days ago

Kudos to the EU, end the waste.

[-] uis@lemm.ee 16 points 6 days ago

Only suck it lightning. It still allows standard chargers like micro USB and mini USB

[-] sockenklaus@sh.itjust.works 13 points 6 days ago

Are you sure? The EU parliament explicitly mentions USB C as the new mandatory standard.

[-] uis@lemm.ee 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX%3A32022L2380

USB C is mentioned in annex Ia and as an example in articles 11 and 12. As I understand previous articles, it is possible to use other standards that satisfy citeria from article 9.

[-] Zetta@mander.xyz 5 points 6 days ago

Open standard W

[-] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 11 points 6 days ago

With the iPhone 14 no longer being sold the specs of the rumored SE 2025 make a lot more sense.

[-] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

They should specified speeds too. I think Apple gimps usb c charging speeds

[-] boonhet@lemm.ee 8 points 6 days ago

More speed is more heat is more battery wear.

[-] DesolateMood@lemm.ee 5 points 6 days ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Erasmus@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Yup I have noticed this with my new iPhone 16 pro.

You plug it in and the charging speed as drastically slower than when I use the new ‘official’ apple wireless mag lock (or whatever it’s called) charger.

[-] pseudopsyche 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I have an iPhone 16 and can just from dead to close to 50% in just about half an hour. Is your charger at least 30 watts and supports USB-PD? (I’m using a 65w charger, but remember reading somewhere the iPhone only uses 30w or a bit more)

MagSafe fast charging is only 25w, so charging by cable with a high enough wattage charger is always faster for me.

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Does this law allow for any standards progression or is it USB-c forever?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024
1103 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

60252 readers
2970 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS