327
submitted 3 weeks ago by ToastedPlanet to c/politics@lemmy.world

From remains an unabashed centrist who believes that economic growth, not the economic populism of Sanders or Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, is the answer. “It’s important the critical mass in the Democratic party show that it’s the party of opportunity, responsibility and community but not the party of the left,” he insists.

He also argues that the party should not be afraid to talk about law enforcement and developing a system of community policing rather than urging “defund the police”. Likewise it should embrace the idea of legal immigration and a border that is under control. From applauds governors who have made jobs available to people without college degrees.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 115 points 3 weeks ago

This is the exact kind of fucker that just helped get Trump elected.

[-] ToastedPlanet 61 points 3 weeks ago

Yes, and now they are proudly declaring they aren't going to put down the shovel. They want to keep digging this hole we're in.

There is no bottom by the way, they will just keep digging until enough people learn the lessons. If we wait to see how bad it can get it will only get worse.

[-] cogman@lemmy.world 57 points 3 weeks ago

In an era where people, right and left, are loudly cheering on a guy that allegedly murdered a CEO, this idiot advisor thinks the direction we need to go is defunding Medicare and further privatization of government functions.

This jackass wants Democrats to be a conservative party to respond to the existing conservative party. He literally wants to do the southern strategy again.

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 83 points 3 weeks ago

Ffs. Get rid of the dinosaurs and start over. If the Dems can't do it, maybe it's time for a new party.

[-] weeeeum@lemmy.world 36 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah. I'm done with the dems. After seeing pelosi win from her hospital bed I knew there was no future for this party. Their only identity now is the "not trump" party, which doesnt work when half the country views him favourably.

[-] ToastedPlanet 10 points 3 weeks ago

The Democrats and Republicans being the only game in town is a consequence of our first-past-the-post voting system. We are stuck with the Dems until we change the system. To refuse to use the Democratic Party, our only to effective political tool, is to refuse to engage meaningfully in politics.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7tWHJfhiyo

[-] weeeeum@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

With the recent crushing defeat, and the dems learning NOTHING, they seem content to keep losing. Every vote for them is wasted anyways so might as well toss it to a third party. One that can actually hold a fucking primary.

God the dems piss me off so much.

[-] ToastedPlanet 10 points 3 weeks ago

The issue with that is the US's first-past-the-post system which results in our two party system. We need to change the system or else a new party will only act as a spoiler.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7tWHJfhiyo

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 3 weeks ago

Yes, I am unfortunately aware of this.

[-] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It can probably still be done if it’s truly grass roots. From the bottom up and not straight up aiming for seats in the senate and for the Oval Office. A third party should start winning seats in small elections in small towns where Democrats rule. Like even a school board election matters. Basically every small election where Democrats win uncontested. They need to push incumbent Democrats out first before trying to flip a red seat.

Once the third party has pushed enough Democrats out of their seats the Democrats have no choice than to form an alliance with the new third party. Which would push the Democratic Party to the left.

That’s basically how the Tea Party and later Maga co-opted the GOP.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 49 points 3 weeks ago

This is exactly what they HAVE been doing for DECADES! What a crock of shit!

[-] PlantJam@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

Yes but now there's a fresh dose of "but not like Bernie" to placate the blue donors.

[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 40 points 3 weeks ago

Oh my fucking God WHY THE EVER LOVING FUCK IS THERE ANOTHER FUCKING INTERVIEW WITH AL FUCKING FROM?!?!?! For fuck's sake, the last time I heard from this fucking dinosaur was after Hillary Clinton lost in 2016, and they were dragging his old ass out of retirement to explain why actually, despite losing to Donald Trump, moderate centrism was a good strategy. Almost ten years later, and they're dragging his even-older ass out here to do the same fucking thing? This dipshit's centrist strategy won one election 32 years ago, and now we've got to listen to him prattle on about how Democrats need to be more moderate forever? I mean, Jesus Fucking Christ, its bad enough we have to listen to a Democratic fuckwad explain why this, "win suburban moderates," strategy is good (even though it has lost to Donald Trump twice now). But for fuck's sake, is it too much to ask that that they at least find a fuckwad who hasn't been politically irrelevant for 20 years? Is their really no one else beside this fucking 80 year-old ghoul that can champion this stupid, obviously ineffective strategy? I mean, fucking hell, what the fuck are we even doing here?

[-] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Dems picked a throat cancer ridden geriatric instead of a young woman.

They have a fetish for old farts

[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

To be fair, it was Jerry Connolly's turn. There's nothing more important than that.

[-] h3mlocke@lemm.ee 4 points 3 weeks ago
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Toneswirly@lemmy.world 38 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The democratic party is always going to shun leftism because they get a buttload of money every year to turn a blind eye to good reform policies. Money and leftism dont mix, so the money makes sure leftism doesnt stick.

[-] ToastedPlanet 8 points 3 weeks ago

The Democrats are going to follow the people who vote. They get money from corporate donors to be neoliberals. We need a socialist and progressive movement to co-opt the Democratic party. But in the mean time, as long as we still have elections, we can kick fascists out of power and get the Democrats to cater to leftists incrementally.

This isn't enough to solve climate change or wealth inequality, but until the Democratic party is co-opted the way the Republican party was by MAGA we need to exercise power by voting for the candidates the furthest to the left in elections. Between elections we need grassroots movements to get better candidates.

[-] tiefling 6 points 3 weeks ago

for the candidates the furthest to the left in elections

I agree, I just wish that wasn't "senile corporate centrist" every single damn time

[-] sudo@programming.dev 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

We need a socialist and progressive movement to co-opt the Democratic party

People have been trying that for the past 8 years if you haven't been paying attention.

[-] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago

In political terms, that's known as just starting. As a much broader example, it was only in 1965 that America got (almost) universal suffrage. Depending on the state, that was a problem since 1776.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world 37 points 3 weeks ago

Hilarious. Why do a less committed version of the same shitty politics as the other party? Who the fuck is this going to win over? Did you miss what happened in November?

I would ask if they were high but that would encourage creativity and awaken any remaining embers of idealism so it can't be the case.

Just leaving this here for no particular reason https://youtu.be/3cdqQ2BdgOA?si=eDv9_1tiy_bvlFCJ

[-] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 37 points 3 weeks ago

His name being "From" makes this difficult to parse.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

We're all here to hear it all from Al From here.

[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 35 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

SHIVERS [Medium: Success]

Democrat strategist boardroom, 2AM. Three men are pacing around a conference table, their polished leather shoes staining the papers scattered across the dimly lit room. They look stumped, sweat dripping from their reddened foreheads. One of the men stammers half words and stops himself, discarding another idea. The man to his left lights a cigarette.

After an uncomfortable silence, glimmer returns to his eyes, he snaps his fingers and promptly says: "What if we sucked even worse?"

[-] cogman@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

Literally "you know who was a great president? Ronald Reagan".

[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I want to get off of Mr. Jazz Asphodel's wild ride :(

[-] Sixtyforce@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago

Disco shitposts are the absolute pinnacle of the art.

[-] ToastedPlanet 28 points 3 weeks ago

The Democratic strategists predictably have both learned nothing from this losing this election and are planning on shifting the party to the right. Accelerationism is useless. There was no leverage over the Democrats, instead they are going to chase after moderates and conservatives who voted. If we are lucky enough to have another election, please vote and encourage other people to vote.

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 20 points 3 weeks ago

the lack of votes is because the democrats suck; telling them to vote wo addressing the reasons why they don't vote is a waste of time.

[-] ToastedPlanet 4 points 3 weeks ago

There can be more than one lesson from an election. Democrats need a populist socialist and progressive narrative. Socialists, progressives, and leftists in general need to push the Democrats to the left by voting for them during elections. Between elections we need grassroots movements to get better candidates.

If leftists cling to accelerationism in 2026 and 2028 we will see the rightward trend of the Democrat party continue. Accelerationism makes it harder to fix things by allowing them to get worse while learning nothing.

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago

If leftists cling to accelerationism in 2026 and 2028 we will see the rightward trend of the Democrat party continue. Accelerationism makes it harder to fix things by allowing them to get worse while learning nothing.

Aka: Rinse and repeat 🙄

Let's both hope your democratic non-voter buddies are pissed off enough at trump during the next cycle to show up and vote this time, because leftists definitely won't if the dnc keeps going rightwards; again.

I can understand how daunting of a task it may seem to get your own people to vote from where you're sitting on a horse so high that you're unable to understand that you've bought into an alienating stereotype of your most needful allies to defeat the trumpers, but I have faith that Americans will come to see how we keep shooting ourselves in the foot; eventually.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 13 points 3 weeks ago

Vote for who? The democrats were unelectable this election and will remain unelectable until they ditch their corporate status quo nonsense. This isn't to say Trump is a better option, but the GOP and DNC were never competing on the same level and thinking they are will only lead to more Trump or Trump wannabes because no matter how much you (or anyone else) tell people to vote people won't vote for the current DNC.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago

The answer is that you vote in the primaries to shift the party left as far as you can, and then you vote in the general for whatever version of that party you end up with that time around. You don't sit on your ass in the expectation that they will come to you; you make them come to you.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 9 points 3 weeks ago

The primary that the DNC messes with to get the candidate they want every time? Or the one they skip or cancel when it doesn't suit them? Not saying people shouldn't vote in primaries, but the DNC is way beyond being fixed by actions like this.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Primaries. Plural. As in there are a whole bunch of them. Not just the one for president.

You don't start at the top. You get your candidates in from the bottom up, and then you go for the top jobs.

Look, you only have two options here; fix the party you have, or come up with a realistic plan for building a new one that can somehow be electorally viable. So unless you really think you can offer a clear and actionable path to the latter, you're stuck with the former.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Primaries. Plural. As in there are a whole bunch of them. Not just the one for president.

Jessica Cisneros says hello.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] nifty@lemmy.world 25 points 3 weeks ago

We need progressives, not neoliberals

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago

AOC should be the next head of the party. If not they will fail. No one else in the party now is good enough except Bernie but he's too old now. Nancy needs to go

[-] xor@lemm.ee 8 points 3 weeks ago

the DNC needs to be completely overhauled or thrown out. Bernie would’ve definitely beat Trump but they actively conspired against him, and then when sued for fraud, claimed they never said they’re actually democratic, in spite of the name… and won in court.

the GOP tried to stop Trump as well, and in spite of being complete pieces of shit, they actually are democratic and couldn’t stop him.

but, as they say, the entire system is stupid and designed to fuck us over.
i see this continuing until the collapse of the usa, and probably the entire planet’s ecosystem

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ToastedPlanet 23 points 3 weeks ago

Also, a great out of context quote that somehow works better out of context at showing how bad these ideas are.

“You’d think the Democrats would do better. I look at it from that perspective and so are we in as deep trouble as we were in 1984, 1988? Probably not. But there are trends like what’s happening among working-class voters of all colours and ethnic groups that are concerning. If they aren’t arrested, they could lead us into the wilderness again.”

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 weeks ago

Cheryl, it sounds like grandpa is off his meds again. Can you get him into the living room and in front of the TV so he doesn't scare the kids?

[-] ToastedPlanet 14 points 3 weeks ago

Grandpa wants to arrest everyone again! blobcat, googly, jailed

[-] Xanthrax@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

"wE don't NeEd aN extRemiSt."

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Never gonna happen :(

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024
327 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19378 readers
3234 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS